Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers

Radiology

Volumn 225, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 519-526

  Huo, Zhimin ^a   Giger, Maryellen L ^a   Olopade, Olufunmilayo I ^a   Wolverton, Dulcy E ^a   Weber, Barbara L ^a   Metz, Charles E ^a   Zhong, Weiming ^a   Cummings, Shelly A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, radiography; Breast, diseases; Computers, diagnostic aid; Genes and genetics; Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve

Indexed keywords

BRCA1 PROTEIN; BRCA2 PROTEIN;

ADULT; APPARATUS; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DENSITY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DIGITAL COMPUTER; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GENE MUTATION; GERM LINE; HETEROZYGOTE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; ONCOGENE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036830333     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2252010845     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD. Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study. Am J Hum Genet 1991; 48:232-242.
2. Newman B, Austin MA, Lee M, King MC. Inheritance of human breast cancer: Evidence for autosomal dominant transmission in high risk families. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1988; 85:3044-3048.
3. Easton DF, Ford D, Bishop TD. Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Am J Hum Genet 1995; 56:256-271.
4. Boyd NF, Byng J, Jong R. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: Results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87:670-675.
5. Saftlas AF, Hoover RN, Brinton LA, et al. Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer. Cancer 1991; 67:2833-2838.
6. Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: Effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995; 87:1622-1629.
7. Wolfe JN, Saftlas AF, Salane M. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: A case-control study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 148:1087-1092.
8. Hedenfalk I, Duggan D, Chen Y, et al. Gene-expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:539-548
9. Ford D, Easton DF, Bishop DT, Narod SA, Goldgar DE. Risk of cancer in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Lancet 1994; 343:692-695.
10. Tirkkonen M, Johannsson O, Agnarsson BA, et al. Distinct somatic genetic changes associated with tumor progression in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ-line mutations. Cancer Res 1997; 57:1222-1227.
11. Marcus JN, Watson P, Page DL, et al. Hereditary breast cancer: Pathobiology, prognosis, and BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene linkage. Cancer 1996; 77:697-709.
12. Wolfe J. Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1976; 126:1130-1139.
13. Warner E, Lockwood G, Math M, Tritchler D, Boyd NF. The risk of breast cancer associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns: A meta-analysis of the published literature to examine the effect of method of classification. Cancer Detect Prev 1992; 16:67-72.
14. Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Lockwood GA, et al. Automated analysis of mammographic densities and breast carcinoma risk. Cancer 1997; 88:66-74.
15. Tahoces P, Correa J, Souto M, Gomes L, Vidal J. Computer-assisted diagnosis: The classification of mammographic breast parenchymal patterns. Phys Med Biol 1995; 40:103-117.
16. Huo Z, Giger ML, Wolverton DE, et al. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: Feature selection. Med Phys 2000; 27:4-12.
17. Gail MH, Benichou J. Assessing the risk of breast cancer in individuals. In: DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds. Cancer Prevention. Philadelphia, Pa. Lippincott, 1992; 1-15.
18. Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wicherham DL, et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: Report from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90:1371-1388.
19. Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD. Autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset breast cancer: Implications for risk prediction. Cancer 1993; 73:643-651.
20. Amadasum M, King R. Texture features corresponding to texture properties. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernetics 1989; 19:1264-1274.
21. Lachenbruch PL. Discriminant Analysis. London, England: Hafner, 1975.
22. Chang J, Yang WT, Choo HF. Mammography in Asian patients with BRCA1 mutations. Lancet 1999; 353:2070-2071.
23. Helvie MA, Roubidoux MA, Weber BL, Merajver SD. Mammography of breast carcinoma in women who have mutations of the breast cancer gene BRCA1: Initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:1599-1602.
24. Metz CE. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 1986; 21:720-733.
25. Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989; 24:234-245.
26. Metz CE, Herman BA, Shen J. Maximum-likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. Stat Med 1998; 17:1033-1053.
27. Hays WL. Statistics. Philadelphia, Pa: Harcourt Brace College, 1994.
28. Metz CE, Herman BA, Roe CA. Statistical comparison of two ROC-curve estimates obtained from partially-paired datasets. Med Decis Making 1998; 18:110-121.