Rules or schemas? Evidence from Polish

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 225-271

  Dabrowska, Ewa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COGNITION; CONSONANT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHONETICS; POLAND; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; REVIEW; SPEECH ANALYSIS; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 1942467877     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960344000170     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Alegre, M., & Gordon, P. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 41-61.
2. Behrens, H. (2001). Learning multiple regularities: Evidence from overgeneralisation errors in the German plural. In A. H.-J. Do, L. Dominguez, & A. Johansen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 72-83). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
3. Behrens, H. (submitted). How to learn a minority default: The acquisition of the German -s plural.
4. Berent, I., Pinker, S., & Shimron, J. (1999). Default nominal inflection in Hebrew: evidence for mental variables. Cognition, 72, 1-44.
5. Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150-177.
6. Bittner, D., & Köpcke, K.-M. (2000). Acquisition of the German plural markings: A case study in natural and cognitive morphology. In C. Schaner-Wolles, J.R. Rennison, & F. Neubarth (Eds.), Naturally! Linguistic Studies in Honour of Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler Presented on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday (pp. 45-58). Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.
7. Bodnarowska, J. (1962). Problematyka doboru końcówek -a/-u w dopełniaczu l.p. rzeczowników meskich. Jezyk Polski, 42, 29-49.
8. Bybee, J.L. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425-455.
9. Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297-332.
10. Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 22, 991-1060.
11. Clahsen, H., Aveledo, F., & Roca, I. (2002). The development of regular and irregular verb inflection in Spanish child language. Journal of Child Language, 29, 591-622.
12. Clahsen, H., Rothweiler, M., Woest, A., & Marcus, G.F. (1992). Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition, 45, 225-255.
13. Dabrowska, E. (2001). Learning a morphological system without a default: The Polish genitive. Journal of Child Language, 28, 545-574.
14. Elman, J.L., Bates, E.A., Johnson, M.H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Gawlitzek-Maiwald, I. (1994). How do children cope with variation in the input? The case of German plurals and compounding. In R. Tracy & E. Lattey (Eds.), How tolerant is universal grammar? Essays on language variability and language variation (pp. 225-266). Tü bingen: Niemeyer.
16. Jaeger, J.J., Lockwood, A.H., Kemmerer, D.L., Van Valin, R.D., & Murphy, B.W. (1996). Positron emission tomographic study of regular and irregular verb morphology in English. Language, 72, 451-497.
17. Janik-Płocińska, B., Sas, M., & Turczyn, R. (2001). Wielki słownik ortograficzno-fleksyjny. Warszawa: Horyzont.
18. Köpcke, K.M. (1988). Schemas in German plural formation. Lingua, 74, 303-335.
19. Köpcke, K.M. (1998). The acquisition of plural marking in English and German revisited: Schemata versus rules. Journal of Child Language, 25, 293-319.
20. Kottum, S.E. (1981). The genitive singular form of masculine nouns in Polish. Scando-Slavica, 27, 179-186.
21. Kuczaj, S.A. (1977). The acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 589-600.
22. Kurcz, I., Lewicki, A., Sambor, J., Szafran, K., & Worończak, J. (1990). Słownik frekwencyjny polszczyzny współczesnej. Kraków: Polska Akademia Nauk.
23. Langacker, R.W. (1990). The rule controversy: A cognitive grammar perspective. Centre for Research in Language Newsletter (University of California, San Diego), 4(3), 4-15.
24. Langacker, R.W. (1991). Concept, image and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
25. Langacker, R.W. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 1-63). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
26. MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
27. Marchman, V.A. (1997). Children's productivity in the English past tense: The role of frequency, phonology and neighbourhood structure. Cognitive Science, 21, 283-304.
28. Marchman, V.A., & Bates, E. (1994). Continuity in lexical and morphological development: A test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language, 21, 339-366.
29. Marcus, G.F., Brinkman, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 189-256.
30. Marcus, G.F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, T.J., & Xu, F. (1992). Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57, 1-180.
31. Marslen-Wilson, W.D., & Tyler, L.K. (1997). Dissociating types of mental computation. Nature, 387, 592-594.
32. Marslen-Wilson, W.D., & Tyler, L.K. (1998). Rules, representations, and the English past tense. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2, 428-435.
33. Nagórko, A. (1998). Zarys gramatyki polskiej (ze słowotwórstwem). Warszawa: PWN.
34. Orsolini, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1997). Universals in morphological representation: Evidence from Italian. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 1-47.
35. Orzechowska, A. (1998). Rzeczownik. In R. Grzegorczykowa, R. Laskowski, & H. Wróbel (Eds.), Gramatyka współ czesnego jezyka polskiego. Morfologia (pp. 270-332). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
36. Pinker, S. (1998). Words and rules. Lingua, 106, 219-242.
37. Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
38. Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1992). Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, 230-251.
39. Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building: Acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition, 48, 21-69.
40. Prasada, S., & Pinker, S. (1993). Generalisations of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 1-56.
41. Ramscar, M. (2002). The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense does not require a rule. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 45-94.
42. Rumelhart, D.E., & McClelland, J.L. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In D.E. Rumelhart & J.L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing. Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 2: Psychological and biological models (pp. 216-271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
44. Seidenberg, M.S., & Hoeffner, J.H. (1998). Evaluating behavioural and neuroimaging data on past tense processing. Language, 74, 104-122.
45. Smoczyńska, M. (1998). Krakowskie dane jezykowe dzieci w systemie CHILDES. In M. Smoczyńska (Ed.), Studia z psychologii rozwojowej i psycholingwistyki (pp. 283-296). Kraków: Universitas.
46. Szagun, G. (2001). Learning different regularities: the acquisition of noun plurals by German-speaking children. First Language, 21, 109-141.
47. Taylor, J.R. (2002). Cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Tokarski, J. (2001). Fleksja polska. Warszawa: PWN.
49. Tokarski, J., & Saloni, Z. (2002). Schematyczny indeks a tergo polskich form wyrazowych. Warszawa: PWN.
50. Ullman, M.T. (1999). Acceptability ratings of regular and irregular past tense forms: Evidence for a dual-system model of language from word frequency and phonological neighbourhood effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 47-67.
51. Ullman, M., Bergida, R., & O'Craven, K.M. (1997a). Distinct fMRI activation patterns for regular and irregular past tense. NeuroImage, 5, S549.
52. Ullman, M.T., Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hickok, G., Growdon, J.H., Koroshetz, W.J., et al. (1997b). A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 2-27.
53. Wegener, H. (1994). Variation in the acquisition of German plural morphology by second language learners. In R. Tracy & E. Lattey (Eds.), How tolerant is universal grammar? Essays on language variability and language variation (pp. 267-294). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
54. Westfal, S. (1956). A study in Polish morphology. The genitive singular masculine. The Hague: Mouton.
55. Xu, F., & Pinker, S. (1995). Weird past tense forms. Journal of Child Language, 22, 531-556.