Automated percentage of breast density measurements for full-field digital mammography applications

Academic Radiology

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 958-970

  Fowler, Erin E E ^a   Vachon, Celine M ^b   Scott, Christopher G ^b   Sellers, Thomas A ^a   Heine, John J ^a  

^a H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Mayo Clinic College of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Automated measure; Breast cancer risk; Breast density; Differential evolution; Full field digital mammography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PERCENTAGE OF BREAST DENSITY; BODY MASS; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENSITY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPERATOR ASSISTED PERCENTAGE OF DENSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; AGED; AGING; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VERY ELDERLY;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84903985129     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Boyd N.F., Guo H., Martin L.J., et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007, 356(3):227-236.
2. McCormack V.A., dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006, 15(6):1159-1169.
3. Boyd N.F., Martin L.J., Yaffe M.J., et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects. Breast Cancer Res 2011, 13(6):223.
4. Yaffe M.J. Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res 2008, 10(3):209.
5. Keller B.M., Nathan D.L., Wang Y., et al. Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation. Med Phys 2012, 39(8):4903-4917.
6. Manduca A., Carston M.J., Heine J.J., et al. Texture features from mammographic images and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009, 18(3):837-845.
7. Highnam R., Brady M. Mammographic image analysis 1999, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
8. Pawluczyk O., Augustine B.J., Yaffe M.J., et al. A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms. Med Phys 2003, 30(3):352-364.
9. Shepherd J.A., Herve L., Landau J., et al. Novel use of single X-ray absorptiometry for measuring breast density. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2005, 4(2):173-182.
10. Tice J.A., Cummings S.R., Ziv E., et al. Mammographic breast density and the Gail model for breast cancer risk prediction in a screening population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005, 94(2):115-122.
11. Highnam R., Pan X., Warren R., et al. Breast composition measurements using retrospective standard mammogram form (SMF). Phys Med Biol 2006, 51(11):2695-2713.
12. Jeffreys M., Warren R., Highnam R., et al. Initial experiences of using an automated volumetric measure of breast density: the standard mammogram format. Br J Radiol 2006, 79(941):378-382.
13. Heine J.J., Thomas J.A. Effective x-ray attenuation coefficient measurements from two full field digital mammography systems for data calibration applications. Biomed Eng Online 2008, 7(1):13.
14. Jeffreys M., Warren R., Highnam R., et al. Breast cancer risk factors and a novel measure of volumetric breast density: cross-sectional study. Br J Cancer 2008, 98(1):210-216.
15. Heine J.J., Cao K., Beam C. Cumulative sum quality control for calibrated breast density measurements. Med Phys 2009, 36(12):5380-5390.
16. Malkov S., Wang J., Kerlikowske K., et al. Single x-ray absorptiometry method for the quantitative mammographic measure of fibroglandular tissue volume. Med Phys 2009, 36(12):5525-5536.
17. Boyd N., Martin L., Gunasekara A., et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: evaluation of a novel method of measuring breast tissue volumes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009, 18(6):1754-1762.
18. Heine J.J., Cao K., Thomas J.A. Effective radiation attenuation calibration for breast density: compression thickness influences and correction. Biomed Eng Online 2010, 9:73.
19. TM. IWDM 2010 2010, 342-349. Springer-Verlag. J. Marti (Ed.).
20. Shepherd J.A., Kerlikowske K., Ma L., et al. Volume of mammographic density and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011, 20(7):1473-1482.
21. Ciatto S., Bernardi D., Calabrese M., et al. A first evaluation of breast radiological density assessment by QUANTRA software as compared to visual classification. Breast 2012, 21(4):503-506.
22. Highnam R., Sauber N., Destounis S., et al. Breast density into clinical practice. 11th International Workshop of Digital Mammography 2012, 466-473. Springer, Philadelphia, PA. A.D.A. Maidment, P.R. Bakic, S. Gavenonis (Eds.).
23. Skippage P., Wilkinson L., Allen S., et al. Correlation of age and HRT use with breast density as assessed by Quantra. The Breast Journal 2013, 19(1):79-86.
24. Bick U., Diekmann F. Medical radiology diagnostic imaging and radiation oncology. Continuation of Handbuch der medizinischen Radiologie Encyclopedia of Medical Radiology 2010, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. A.L. Baert, L.W. Brady, H.-P. Heilmann (Eds.).
25. Kim H.K., Cunningham I.A., Yin Z., et al. On the development of digital radiography detectors: A review. Int J Precis Eng Man 2008, 9(4):86-100.
26. Mahesh M. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: digital mammography: an overview. Radiographics 2004, 24(6):1747-1760.
27. Heine J.J., Deans S.R., Velthuizen R.P., et al. On the statistical nature of mammograms. Med Phys 1999, 26(11):2254-2265.
28. Heine J.J., Velthuizen R.P. A statistical methodology for mammographic density detection. Med Phys 2000, 27(12):2644-2651.
29. Heine J.J., Carston M.J., Scott C.G., et al. An automated approach for estimation of breast density. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008, 17(11):3090-3097.
30. Heine J.J., Behera M. Aspects of signal-dependent noise characterization. J Opt Soc Am A 2006, 23(4):806-815.
31. Olson J.E., Sellers T.A., Scott C.G., et al. The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the mayo mammography health study cohort. Breast Cancer Res 2012, 14(6):R147.
32. Heine J.J., Scott C.G., Sellers T.A., et al. A novel automated mammographic density measure and breast cancer risk. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2012, 104(13):1028-1037.
33. Hosmer D.W., Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression 2000, John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken. Second Edition.
34. Breslow N., Day N. The analysis of case-control studies. IARC Sci Publ 1980, 32:147-178.
35. Vachon C.M., Fowler E.E., Tiffenberg G., et al. Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data. Breast Cancer Res 2013, 15(1):R1.
36. Heine J.J., Deans S.R., Cullers D.K., et al. Multiresolution statistical analysis of high-resolution digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997, 16(5):503-515.
37. Heine J.J., Deans S.R., Cullers D.K., et al. Multiresolution probability analysis of gray-scaled images. J Opt Soc Am A 1998, 15(5):1048-1058.
38. Heine J.J., Deans S.R., Gangadharan D., et al. Multiresolution analysis of two-dimensional 1/f processes: approximation methods for random variable transformations. OPT ENG 1999, 38:1505.
39. Fowler E.E., Lu B., Heine J.J. A comparison of calibration data from full field digital mammography units for breast density measurements. Biomed Eng Online 2013, 12:114.
40. Price K.V., Storn R.M., Lampinen J.A. Differential evolution: a practical approach to global optimization 2005, Springer, Berlin ; New York.
41. Behera M., Fowler E.E., Owonikoko T.K., et al. Statistical learning methods as a preprocessing step for survival analysis: evaluation of concept using lung cancer data. Biomed Eng Online 2011, 10(1):97.
42. Heine J.J., Cao K., Rollison D.E., et al. A quantitative description of the percentage of breast density measurement using full-field digital mammography. Acad Radiol 2011, 18(5):556-564.
43. Heine J.J., Cao K., Rollison D.E. Calibrated measures for breast density estimation. Acad Radiol 2011, 18(5):547-555.
44. Fowler E.E., Sellers T.A., Lu B., et al. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast composition descriptors: automated measurement development for full field digital mammography. Med Phys 2013, 40(11):113502.
45. Keller B.M., Nathan D.L., Gavenonis S.C., et al. Reader variability in breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms: the effect of image postprocessing on relative and absolute measures. Acad Radiol 2013, 20(5):560-568.
46. Griffin W.C. Transform techniques for probability modeling 1975, Academic Press, New York.
47. Ding J., Warren R., Warsi I., et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of using standard mammogram form to predict breast cancer risk: case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008, 17(5):1074-1081.
48. Heine J.J., Fowler E.E., Flowers C.I. Full field digital mammography and breast density: comparison of calibrated and noncalibrated measurements. Acad Radiol 2011, 18(11):1430-1436.
49. Schousboe J.T., Kerlikowske K., Loh A., et al. Personalizing Acad Radiol mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness. Annals of internal medicine 2011, 155(1):10-20.
50. FDA. MQSA National statistics. Available at:. http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/MammographyQualityStandardsActandProgram/FacilityScorecard/ucm113858.htm.
51. MarketRseacrh.com. Full-field digital mammography equipment-Global Pipeline Analysis, Competitive Landscape and Market Forecasts to 2017. Available at:. http://F:Full-Field%20Digital%20Mammography%20Equipment%20-%20Global%20Pipeline%20Analysis,%20Competitive%20Landscape%20and%20Market%20Forecasts%20to%202017%20by%20GlobalData%20in%20Mammography.mht.