Full Field Digital Mammography and Breast Density. Comparison of Calibrated and Noncalibrated Measurements.

Academic Radiology

Volumn 18, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1430-1436

  Heine, John J ^a   Fowler, Erin E E ^a   Flowers, Chris I ^a  

^a H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Automation; Breast cancer risk; Breast density; Calibration

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY MEASUREMENT; CALIBRATION; CANCER RISK; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FULL FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; STANDARD;

BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALIBRATION; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 80053617576     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.07.011     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Boyd N.F., Martin L.J., Bronskill M., et al. Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010, 102:1224-1237.
2. McCormack V.A., dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prevention 2006, 15:1159-1169.
3. D'Orsi C.J., Bassett L.W., Berg W.A., et al. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS (ed 4) 2003, American College of Radiology, Reston, VA.
4. Ooms E.A., Zonderland H.M., Eijkemans M.J., et al. Mammography: interobserver variability in breast density assessment. Breast 2007, 16:568-576.
5. Brower V. Breast density gains acceptance as breast cancer risk factor. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010, 102:374-375.
6. Yaffe M.J. Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res 2008, 10:209.
7. Highnam R., Brady M. Mammographic Image Analysis 1999, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
8. Kaufhold J., Thomas J.A., Eberhard J.W., et al. A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography. Med Phys 2002, 29:1867-1880.
9. Pawluczyk O., Augustine B.J., Yaffe M.J., et al. A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms. Med Phys 2003, 30:352-364.
10. van Engeland S., Snoeren P.R., Huisman H., et al. Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006, 25:273-282.
11. Malkov S., Wang J., Kerlikowske K., et al. Single x-ray absorptiometry method for the quantitative mammographic measure of fibroglandular tissue volume. Med Phys 2009, 36:5525-5536.
12. Boyd N., Martin L., Gunasekara A., et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: evaluation of a novel method of measuring breast tissue volumes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prevention 2009, 18:1754-1762.
13. Ding J., Warren R., Warsi I., et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of using standard mammogram form to predict breast cancer risk: case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prevention 2008, 17:1074-1081.
14. Shepherd J.A., Kerlikowske K., Ma L., et al. Volume of mammographic density and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prevention 2011, 20:1473-1482.
15. Heine J.J., Cao K., Rollison D.E., et al. A quantitative description of the percentage of breast density measurement using full-field digital mammography. Acad Radiol 2011, 18:556-564.
16. Heine J.J., Cao K., Rollison D.E. Calibrated measures for breast density estimation. Acad Radiol 2011, 18:547-555.
17. Heine J.J., Behera M. Effective x-ray attenuation measurements with full field digital mammography. Medi Phys 2006, 33:4350-4366.
18. Heine J.J., Cao K., Beam C. Cumulative sum quality control for calibrated breast density measurements. Med Phys 2009, 36:5380-5390.
19. Heine J.J., Cao K., Thomas J.A. Effective radiation attenuation calibration for breast density: compression thickness influences and correction. BioMedical Engineering Online 2010, 9:73.
20. Heine J.J., Thomas J.A. Effective x-ray attenuation coefficient measurements from two full field digital mammography systems for data calibration applications. BioMedical Engineering Online 2008, 7:13.
21. Heine J.J., Deans S.R., Velthuizen R.P., et al. On the statistical nature of mammograms. Med Phys 1999, 26:2254-2265.
22. Heine J.J., Velthuizen R.P. A statistical methodology for mammographic density detection. Med Phys 2000, 27:2644-2651.
23. Heine J.J., Velthuizen R.P. Spectral analysis of full field digital mammography data. Med Phys 2002, 29:647-661.
24. Mawdsley G.E., Tyson A.H., Peressotti C.L., et al. Accurate estimation of compressed breast thickness in mammography. Med Phys 2009, 36:577-586.
25. Tyson A.H., Mawdsley G.E., Yaffe M.J. Measurement of compressed breast thickness by optical stereoscopic photogrammetry. Med Phys 2009, 36:569-576.