Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data

Breast Cancer Research

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Vachon, Celine M ^a   Fowler, Erin E E ^b   Tiffenberg, Gail ^b   Scott, Christopher G ^a   Pankratz, V Shane ^a   Sellers, Thomas A ^b   Heine, John J ^b  

^a Mayo Clinic   (United States)

^b H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AGE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FULL FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HORMONE SUBSTITUTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PERCENT DENSITY; POSTMENOPAUSE; PREMENOPAUSE; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; REPRODUCIBILITY; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MAMMARY GLAND; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK FACTOR;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAMMARY GLANDS, HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84871736369     PISSN: 14655411     EISSN: 1465542X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/bcr3372     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Bronskill M, Yaffe MJ, Duric N, Minkin S. Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010, 102:1224-1237. 10.1093/jnci/djq239, 2923218, 20616353.
2. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006, 15:1159-1169. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034, 16775176.
3. Yaffe MJ. Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res 2008, 10:209. 10.1186/bcr2102, 2481498, 18598375.
4. MQSA National Statistics. , http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/MammographyQualityStandardsActandProgram/FacilityScorecard/ucm113858.htm
5. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Conant EF, Fajardo LL, Bassett L, D'Orsi C, Jong R, Rebner M, Digital Mammograhic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) Investigators Group Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005, 353:1773-1783. 10.1056/NEJMoa052911, 16169887, Digital Mammograhic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) Investigators Group.
6. Mahesh M. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: digital mammography: an overview. Radiographics 2004, 24:1747-1760. 10.1148/rg.246045102, 15537982.
7. Heine JJ, Cao K, Rollison DE, Tiffenberg G, Thomas JA. A quantitative description of the percentage of breast density measurement using full-field digital mammography. Acad Radiol 2011, 18:556-564. 10.1016/j.acra.2010.12.015, 3154681, 21474058.
8. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983, 148:839-843.
9. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33:159-174. 10.2307/2529310, 843571.
10. Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Martin LJ, Knight JA, Jong RA, Fishell E, Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Tritchler DL. Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer among subjects with a family history of this disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999, 91:1404-1408. 10.1093/jnci/91.16.1404, 10451446.
11. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Sun L, Guo H, Chiarelli A, Hislop G, Yaffe M, Minkin S. Body size, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006, 15:2086-2092. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0345, 17119032.
12. Fischmann A, Siegmann KC, Wersebe A, Claussen CD, Muller-Schimpfle M. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography: image quality and lesion detection. Br J Radiol 2005, 78:312-315. 10.1259/bjr/33317317, 15774591.
13. Perez-Gomez B, Ruiz F, Martinez I, Casals M, Miranda J, Sanchez-Contador C, Vidal C, Llobet R, Pollan M, Salas D. Women's features and inter-/intra-rater agreement on mammographic density assessment in full-field digital mammograms (DDM-SPAIN). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012, 132:287-295. 10.1007/s10549-011-1833-3, 22042363.
14. Lokate M, Kallenberg MG, Karssemeijer N, Van den Bosch MA, Peeters PH, Van Gils CH. Volumetric breast density from full-field digital mammograms and its association with breast cancer risk factors: a comparison with a threshold method. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010, 19:3096-3105. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0703, 20921336.
15. Burgess A. On the noise variance of a digital mammography system. Med Phys 2004, 31:1987-1995. 10.1118/1.1758791, 15305451.
16. Vedantham S, Karellas A, Suryanarayanan S, Albagli D, Han S, Tkaczyk EJ, Landberg CE, Opsahl-Ong B, Granfors PR, Levis I, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE. Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. Med Phys 2000, 27:558-567. 10.1118/1.598895, 10757607.