Calibrated Measures for Breast Density Estimation

Academic Radiology

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 547-555

  Heine, John J ^a   Cao, Ke ^a   Rollison, Dana E ^a  

^a H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer risk; Breast density; Calibration; Full field digital mammography; Spatial variation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; CALIBRATION; CANCER RISK; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR;

BREAST; CALIBRATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY;

EID: 79953326695     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Boyd N.F., Rommens J.M., Vogt K., et al. Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 2005, 6:798-808.
2. McCormack V.A., dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006, 15:1159-1169.
3. Boyd N.F., Guo H., Martin L.J., et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007, 356:227-236.
4. Harvey J.A., Bovbjerg V.E. Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology 2004, 230:29-41.
5. Wolfe J.N. Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer 1976, 37:2486-2492.
6. Wolfe J.N. Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1976, 126:1130-1139.
7. Byng J.W., Boyd N.F., Fishell E., et al. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol. 1994, 39:1629-1638.
8. Boyd N.F., Byng J.W., Jong R.A., et al. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995, 87:670-675.
9. Manduca A., Carston M.J., Heine J.J., et al. Texture features from mammographic images and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009, 18:837-845.
10. Yaffe M.J. Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res 2008, 10:209.
11. Highnam R., Brady M. Mammographic image analysis 1999, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
12. Kaufhold J., Thomas J.A., Eberhard J.W., et al. A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography. Med Phys 2002, 29:1867-1880.
13. Malkov S., Wang J., Kerlikowske K., et al. Single x-ray absorptiometry method for the quantitative mammographic measure of fibroglandular tissue volume. Med Phys 2009, 36:5525-5536.
14. Pawluczyk O., Augustine B.J., Yaffe M.J., et al. A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms. Med Phys 2003, 30:352-364.
15. van Engeland S., Snoeren P.R., Huisman H., et al. Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006, 25:273-282.
16. Boyd N., Martin L., Gunasekara A., et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: evaluation of a novel method of measuring breast tissue volumes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009, 18:1754-1762.
17. Ding J., Warren R., Warsi I., et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of using standard mammogram form to predict breast cancer risk: case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008, 17:1074-1081.
18. Heine JJ, Cao K, Rollison DE, et al. A quantitative description of the percentage of breast density measurement using full field digital mammography. Acad Radiol. In press.
19. Heine J.J., Behera M. Effective x-ray attenuation measurements with full field digital mammography. Med Phys 2006, 33:4350-4366.
20. Heine J.J., Cao K., Beam C. Cumulative sum quality control for calibrated breast density measurements. Med Phys 2009, 36:5380-5390.
21. Heine J.J., Cao K., Thomas J.A. Effective radiation attenuation calibration representation in mammography: compression thickness influences and correction. BioMed Eng Online 2010, 9:73.
22. Heine J.J., Thomas J.A. Effective x-ray attenuation coefficient measurements from two full field digital mammography systems for data calibration applications. Biomed Eng Online 2008, 7:13.
23. Vedantham S., Karellas A., Suryanarayanan S., et al. Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. Med Phys 2000, 27:558-567.
24. Mahesh M. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: digital mammography: an overview. Radiographics 2004, 24:1747-1760.
25. Heine J.J., Deans S.R., Velthuizen R.P., et al. On the statistical nature of mammograms. Med Phys 1999, 26:2254-2265.
26. Heine J.J., Velthuizen R.P. Spectral analysis of full field digital mammography data. Med Phys 2002, 29:647-661.
27. Vachon C.M., Brandt K.R., Ghosh K., et al. Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007, 16:43-49.
28. Scutt D., Lancaster G.A., Manning J.T. Breast asymmetry and predisposition to breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2006, 8:R14.
29. Heine J.J., Malhotra P. Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography. Part 1. Tissue and related risk factors. Acad Radiol 2002, 9:298-316.