The role of data reuse in the apprenticeship process

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Kriesberg, Adam ^a   Frank, Rebecca D ^a   Faniel, Ixchel M ^b   Yakel, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b OCLC Research   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive apprenticeship; Communities of practice; Data reuse; Digital repositories; Disciplinary repositories; Legitimate peripheral participation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903952297     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15508390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/meet.14505001051     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Anderson, M. S., & Louis, K. S. (1994). The Graduate Student Experience and Subscription to the Norms of Science. Research in Higher Education, 35(3), 273-299. doi:10.1007/BF02496825
2. Anderson, M. S., Oju, E. C., & Falkner, T. M. R. (2001). Help from Faculty: Findings from the Acadia Institute Graduate Education Study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(4), 487-503. doi:10.1007/s11948-001-0006-x
3. Ben-Yehuda, N. (1986). Deviance in Science Towards the Criminology of Science. British Journal of Criminology, 26(1), 1-27.
4. Bragg, A. K. (1976). The Socialization Process in Higher Education (No. ERIC/Higher Education Research Report No. 7.). Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ ERICWebPortal/detailaccno=ED132909
5. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
6. Clark, S. M., & Corcoran, M. (1986). Perspectives on the Professional Socialization of Women Faculty: A Case of Accumulative Disadvantage? The Journal of Higher Education, 57(1), 20-43. doi:10.2307/1981464
7. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive Apprenticeship: Making Things Visible. American Educator: The Professional Journal of the American Federation of Teachers, 15(3), 6-11,38-46.
8. Daniels, M., Faniel, I., Fear, K., & Yakel, E. (2012). Managing Fixity and Fluidity in Data Repositories. In Proceedings of the 2012 iConference (pp. 279-286). Presented at the iConference 2012, Toronto, Canada: ACM. doi:10.1145/2132176.2132212
9. Denicolo, P. (2004). Doctoral Supervision of Colleagues: Peeling Off the Veneer of Satisfaction and Competence. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 693-707. doi:10.1080/0307507042000287203
10. Duguid, P. (2005). "The Art of Knowing": Social and Tacit Dimensions of Knowledge and the Limits of the Community of Practice. The Information Society, 21(2), 109-118. doi:10.1080/01972240590925311
11. Edgeworth, M. (1991). The Act of Discovery: An Ethnography of the Subject-Object Relation in Archaeological Practice. Durham University, Durham, UK. Retrieved from http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/1481/
12. Faniel, I. M., Kriesberg, A., & Yakel, E. (2012). Data Reuse and Sensemaking Among Novice Social Scientists. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1-10. doi:10.1002/meet. 14504901068
13. Faniel, I., & Yakel, E. (2011). Significant properties as contextual metadata. Journal of Library Metadata, 11(3-4), 155-165.
14. Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781-795. doi:10.2307/2095325
15. Gray, P. W., & Jordan, S. R. (2012). Supervisors and Academic Integrity: Supervisors as Exemplars and Mentors. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(4), 299-311. doi:10.1007/s10805-012-9155-6
16. Hackett, E. J. (1990). Science as a Vocation in the 1990s: The Changing Organizational Culture of Academic Science. The Journal of Higher Education, 61(3), 241-279. doi:10.2307/1982130
17. Hockey, J. (1996). A Contractual Solution to Problems in the Supervision of Phd Degrees in the UK. Studies in Higher Education, 21(3), 359-371. doi:10.1080/03075079612331381271
18. Holligan, C. (2005). Fact and Fiction: A Case History of Doctoral Supervision. Educational Research, 47(3), 267-278. doi:10.1080/00131880500287179
19. Ives, G., & Rowley, G. (2005). Supervisor Selection or Allocation and Continuity of Supervision: Ph.d. Students' Progress and Outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 535-555. doi:10.1080/03075070500249161
20. Kam, B. H. (1997). Style and Quality in Research Supervision: The Supervisor Dependency Factor. Higher Education, 34(1), 81-103. doi:10.1023/A:1002946922952
21. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge [England]; New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Lee, A. (2008). How Are Doctoral Students Supervised? Concepts of Doctoral Research Supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267-281. doi:10.1080/03075070802049202
23. Louis, K. S., Holdsworth, J. M., Anderson, M. S., & Campbell, E. G. (2007). Becoming a Scientist: The Effects of Work-Group Size and Organizational Climate. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(3), 311-336.
24. Paglis, L. L., Green, S. G., & Bauer, T. N. (2006). Does Adviser Mentoring Add Value? A Longitudinal Study of Mentoring and Doctoral Student Outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 451-476. doi:10.1007/s11162-005- 9003-2
25. Pyburn, K. A. (2003). What Are We Really Teaching in Archaeological Field Schools? In L. J. Zimmerman, K. D. Vitelli, & J. Hollowell-Zimmer (Eds.), Ethical Issues in Archaeology (pp. 213-223). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
26. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, 'Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001
27. Van House, N. A., Butler, M. H., & Schiff, L. R. (1998). Cooperative Knowledge Work and Practices of Trust: Sharing Environmental Planning Data Sets. In Proceedings of the 1998 ACM Conference On Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 335-343). Presented at the CSCW '98, Seattle, Washington: ACM. doi:10.1145/289444.289508
28. Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a Theory of Organizational Socialization. In B. Staw (Ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 209-264). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc.
29. Vardigan, M., & Whiteman, C. (2007). ICPSR Meets OAIS: Applying the OAIS Reference Model to the Social Science Archive Context. Archival Science, 7(1), 73-87. doi:10.1007/s10502-006-9037-z
30. Yakel, E., Faniel, I. M., Kriesberg, A., & Yoon, A. (2013). Trust in Digital Repositories. International Journal of Digital Curation. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v8i1.251
31. Zimmerman, A. (2007). Not by Metadata Alone: The Use of Diverse Forms of Knowledge to Locate Data for Reuse. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 7(1-2), 5-16. doi:10.1007/s00799-007-0015-8