Significant Properties as Contextual Metadata

Journal of Library Metadata

Volumn 11, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 155-165

  Faniel, Ixchel M ^a   Yakel, Elizabeth ^b  

^a Online Computer Library Center Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

data reuse; digital curation; preservation; significant properties

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855515440     PISSN: 19386389     EISSN: 19375034     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19386389.2011.629959     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alexandria Archive Institute. 2010. Retrieved from http://www.alexandriaarchive.org/
2. Ashley, K., Davis, R. and Pinsent, E. 2008. "Significant properties of e-learning objects (SPeLOs)". Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/preservation/spelosfinal.pdf
3. Berg, M. and Goorman, E. 1999. The contextual nature of medical information. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 56: 51-56.
4. Brown, A. 2008. White paper: Representation information registries Retrieved from http://www.planets-project.eu/docs/reports/Planets_PC3-D7_RepInformationRegistries.pdf
5. Buneman, P., Khanna, S. and Tan, W. 2001. "Why and where: A characterization of data provenance". In Proceedings from Database Theory (ICDT 2001) Edited by: Van den Bussche, J. and Vianu, V. 316-330. London, UK Springer, LNCS 1973
6. Carlson, S. and Anderson, B. 2007. What are data? The many kinds of data and their implications for data re-use. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2)
7. Carter, P. E. and Green, G. 2009. Networks of contextualized data: A framework for cyberinfrastructure data management. Communications of the ACM, 52(2)
8. Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. 2002. "Reference model for an open archival information system (OAIS) (CCSDS 650.0-B-1)". Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Retrieved from http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650×0b1.pdf
9. Conway, E. 2009. "Curating atmospheric data for long term use: Infrastructure and preservation issues for the atmospheric sciences community: SCARP case study 2, Digital Curation Centre". Retrieved from http://www.dcc.ac.uk/scarp
10. Corti, L. 2007. Re-using archived qualitative data: Where, how, why?. Archival Science, 7(1): 37-54.
11. Coyne, M., Duce, D., Hopgood, B., Mallen, G. and Stapleton, M. 2007. "The significant properties of vector images". Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/preservation/vector_images.pdf
12. Coyne, M. and Stapleton, M. 2008. "The significant properties of moving images". Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/preservation/spmovimages_report.pdf
13. Cragin, M. H. and Shankar, K. 2006. Scientific data collections and distributed collective practice. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15(2-3)
14. Faniel, I. M. and Jacobsen, T. 2010. Earthquake engineering researchers assess the reusability of colleagues' data. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19(3-4): 355-375.
15. Faniel, I. M. and Zimmerman, A. 2011. Beyond the data deluge: A research agenda for large-scale data sharing and reuse. International Journal of Digital Curation, 6(1): 58-69.
16. Grace, S., Knight, G. and Montague, L. 2009. "Investigating the significant properties of electronic content over time - InSPECT final report". Retrieved from http://www.significantproperties.org.uk/inspect-finalreport.pdf
17. Hedstrom, M., Lee, C., Olson, J. and Lampe, C. 2006. "The old version flickers more": Digital preservation from the user's perspective. American Archivist, 69(1): 159-187.
18. Jirotka, M., Procter, R., Hartswood, M., Slack, R., Simpson, A., Coopmans, C. and Voss, A. 2005. Collaboration and trust in healthcare innovation: The eDiamoND case study. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 14(4): 369-398.
19. Knight, G. 2009. "InSPECT Framework Report". Retrieved from http://www.significantproperties.org.uk/inspect-framework.pdf
20. Knorr Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Ludäscher, B., Marciano, R. and Moore, R. 2001. "Towards self-validating knowledge-based archives. 11th Workshop on Research Issues in Data Engineering (RIDE)". Heidelberg, Germany: IEEE Computer Society.
22. MacNeil, H., Wei, C., Duranti, L., Gilliland-Swetland, A., Guercio, M., Hackett, Y. and Xiu, Z. 2008. "Authenticity task force report". Retrieved from http://www.interpares.org/book/interpares_book_d_part1.pdf
23. Manjula, P. and Ball, A. 2008. Challenges and issues relating to the use of representation information for the digital curation of crystallography and engineering data. International Journal of Digital Curation, 1(3): 76-88.
24. Matthews, B., McIlwrath, B., Giaretta, D. and Conway, E. 2008. The significant properties of software: A study Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/preservation/2008sigprops
25. Moore, R. W. and Smith, M. Assessment of RLG trusted digital repository requirements. Paper presented at the workshop Digital Curation & Trusted Repositories: Seeking Success. Chapel Hill, NC. Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. Retrieved from http://sils.unc.edu/events/2006jcdl/digitalcuration/Moore_Smith-JCDLWorkshop2006.pdf
26. Moore, R. W. and Smith, M. 2007. Automated validation of trusted digital repository assessment criteria. Journal of Digital Information, 8(2) Retrieved from http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/rt/printerFriendly/198/181
27. Morrissey, S. 2010. The economy of free and open source software in the preservation of digital artefacts. Library Hi Tech, 28(2): 211-223.
28. Rothenberg, J. and Bikson, T. 1999. "Carrying authentic, understandable and usable digital records through time: Report To the Dutch National Archives and Ministry of the Interior". Retrieved from http://www.digitaleduurzaamheid.nl/bibliotheek/docs/final-report_4.pdf
29. Van House, N. A. 2002. Digital libraries and practices of trust: Networked biodiversity information. Social Epistemology, 16(1): 99-114.
30. Van House, N. A., Butler, M. H. and Schiff, L. R. Proceedings of The 1998 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York, NY. Cooperative knowledge work and practices of trust: Sharing environmental planning data sets, pp.335-343. ACM. In S. Poltruck & J. Grudin (Eds.)
31. Vardigan, M. and Whiteman, C. 2007. ICPSR meets OAIS: Applying the OAIS reference model to the social science archive context. Archival Science, 7: 73-87.
32. White, H. C. 2010. Considering personal organization: Metadata practices of scientists. Journal of Library Metadata, 10(2-3): 156-172.
33. Wilson, A., Wright, R., Polfreman, M., Anderson, S., Tanner, S. and Beer, E. 2006. "Moving digital images and sound archiving study". Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/preservation/movingpicturesandsoundarchivingfinalversion.pdf
34. Witt, M., Carlson, J. R., Cragin, M. R. and Brandt, D. S. 2009. Constructing data curation profiles. International Journal of Digital Curation, 4(3): 93-103.
35. Zimmerman, A. 2008. New knowledge form old data: The role of standards in the sharing and reuse of ecological data. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 33(5): 631-652.