Democracy and the problem of the partisan state

Loyalty

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 257-292

  Dawood, Yasmin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903696193     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (82)

1. Nancy L. Rosenblum, On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008).
2. Russell Muirhead, “A Defense of Party Spirit” Perspectives on Politics 4 (December 2006): 713–727.
3. V. O. Key, Politics, Parties and Pressure Groups, 5 th ed. (New York: Crowell, 1964), 163–165.
4. Clinton Rossiter, The American Presidency (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1956).
5. Daryl J. Levinson and Richard H. Pildes, “Separation of Parties, Not Powers” Harvard Law Review 119 (June 2006): 2313.
6. Samuel Issacharoff and Richard H. Pildes, “Politics as Markets: Partisan Lockups of the Democratic Process” Stanford Law Review 50 (February 1998): 708.
7. Heather K. Gerken, “Second-Order Diversity” Harvard Law Review 118 (February 2005): 1102–1103.
8. Nathaniel Persily and Bruce E. Cain, “The Legal Status of Political Parties: A Reassessment of Competing Paradigms” Columbia Law Review 100 (Symposium: Law and Political Parties) (April 2000): 777–778.
9. Mark D. Brewer, “The Rise of Partisanship and the Expansion of Partisan Conflict within the American Electorate” Political Research Quarterly 58 (June 2005): 228–229.
10. Richard H. Pildes, “Why the Center Does Not Hold: The Causes of Hyperpolarized Democracy in America,” California Law Review 99 (April 2011): 273.
11. Russell Muirhead, “A Defense of Party Spirit” 715.
12. Nancy Rosenblum, On the Side of the Angels, 8.
13. Jacob T. Levy, “Federalism, Liberalism, and the Separation of Loyalties,” American Political Science Review 101 (August 2007): 464.
14. Nancy Rosenblum, On the Side of the Angels, 13, 119–121.
15. Muirhead R., “A Defense of Party Spirit” 719.
16. Russell Muirhead, “The Case for Party Loyalty” (this volume).
17. Nancy Rosenblum, On the Side of the Angels, 142.
18. Andrew Rehfeld, “Regulated Conflict and a ‘Proto-Millian’ Defense of Parties or ‘Vote for Me, I’ve Probably Got the Right Answers’” On the Side of the Angels symposium, http://jacobtlevy.blogspot.com/2009/01/on- side-of-angels-symposium-15.html.
19. Cass R. Sunstein, Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 7.
20. Iris Marion Young, Inclusion and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 19.
21. Robert A. Dahl, A Preface to Democratic Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956), 29–31.
22. Cass R. Sunstein, “Preferences and Politics” Philosophy & Public Affairs 20 (Winter 1991): 10.
23. Jane Mansbridge, Beyond Adversary Democracy (New York: Basic Books, 1980), 17.
24. John S. Dryzek, Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 11.
25. Joshua Cohen, “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Seyla Benhabib (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), 98.
26. John S. Dryzek, Deliberative Democracy, 9.
27. Benjamin Barber, Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984), 136–158.
28. Shapiro I., The State of Democratic Theory (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003), 21.
29. Cass R. Sunstein, “Preferences and Politics” 10, 17–18.
30. Iris Marion Young, Inclusion and Democracy, 23.
31. Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson, Democracy and Disagreement (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1998), 2–12, 52–53.
32. Jurgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996).
33. John Ferejohn, “Instituting Deliberative Democracy” In NOMOS XLII: Designing Democratic Institutions, ed. Ian Shapiro and Stephen Macedo (New York: New York University Press, 2000), 76.
34. Cass R. Sunstein, Democracy and the Problem of Free Speech (New York: Free Press, 1995), 247.
35. James Johnson, “Arguing for Deliberation: Some Skeptical Considerations” in Deliberative Democracy, ed. Jon Elster (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 162.
36. Thomas Christiano, The Rule of the Many: Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory (Boulder: Westview, 1996), 246.
37. Cass R. Sunstein, “Beyond the Republican Revival” Yale Law Journal 97 (Symposium: The Republican Civic Tradition) (July 1988): 1548–1556.
38. Philip Pettit, Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), 36.
39. Philip Pettit, “The Common Good” In Justice a, nd Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry, ed. Keith Dowding, Robert E. Goodin, and Carole Pateman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 150.
40. Philip Pettit, Republicanism, 174–183.
41. Joshua Cohen, “Procedure and Substance” 98.
42. Philip Pettit, “Democracy, Electoral and Contestatory” In NOMOS XLII: Designing Democratic Institutions, ed. Ian Shapiro and Stephen Macedo (New York: New York University Press, 2000), 106.
43. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, vol. 2, ed. Victor Gourevitch (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 3, 60.
44. Anna Stilz, Liberal Loyalty: Freedom, Obligation, and the State (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009), 78.
45. Iris Marion Young, Inclusion and Democracy, 23.
46. Cass R. Sunstein, The Partial Constitution (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993), 17.
47. Corey Brettschneider, “The Value Theory of Democracy” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 5 (October 2006): 261, 266, 268.
48. Corey Brettschneider, Democratic Rights: The Substance ofSelf-Government (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007).
49. Nancy Rosenblum, On the Side of the Angels, 106.
50. Jeffrey A. Segal and Harold J. Spaeth, The Supreme Court and the At-titudinalModel (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993).
51. Joshua Cohen, “Procedure and Substance” 98.
52. Brian Barry, Justice as Impartiality (Oxford: Clarendon, 1999), 20.
53. Michael S. Kang and Joanna Shepherd, “The Partisan Price ofJus-tice: An Empirical Analysis of Campaign Contributions and Judicial Decisions” New York University Law Review 86 (April 2011): 73–74.
54. Jack M. Balkin and Sanford Levinson, “Understanding the Constitutional Revolution” Virginia Law Review 87 (October 2001): 1066–1067.
55. Joseph Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 3rd ed. (New York: Harper Perennial, 1950), 272–273.
56. Adam Przeworski, “Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense”In Democracy’s Value, ed. Ian Shapiro and Casiano Hacker-Cordon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 23–25.
57. Nancy Rosenblum, On the Side of the Angels, 359.
58. Muirhead R., “A Defense of Party Spirit” 719.
59. Nancy Rosenblum, On the Side of the Angels, 108.
60. Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where the Constitution Goes Wrong (and How We the People Can Correct It) (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006), 6.
61. Gerry Mackie, Democracy Defended (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
62. Josh Chafetz, “The Unconstitutionality of the Filibuster” Connecticut Law Review 43 (May 2011): 1008–1010.
63. Thomas J. Miles and Cass R. Sunstein, “Do Judges Make Regulatory Policy?” University of Chicago Law Review 73 (Summer 2006): 870–871.
64. John Hart Ely, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980), 103.
65. Michael J. Klarman, “Majoritarian Judicial Review: The Entrenchment Problem,” Georgetown Law Journal 85 (February 1997): 498.
66. Samuel Issacharoff and Richard Pildes, “Politics as Markets” 646.
67. Nathaniel Persily and Bruce Cain argue, “Legal Status of Political Parties” 781.
68. Guy-Uriel E. Charles, “Democracy and Distortion” Cornell Law Review 92 (May 2007): 607–608.
69. Dennis F. Thompson, Just Elections: Creating a Fair Electoral Process in the United States (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002), 179.
70. Richard L. Hasen, “Bad Legislative Intent” Wisconsin Law Review 2006 (2006): 846.
71. Richard L. Hasen, The Supreme Court and Election Law: Judging Equality from Baker v. Carr to Bush v. Gore (New York: New York University Press, 2003).
72. Yasmin Dawood, “The Antidomination Model and the Judicial Oversight of Democracy” Georgetown Law Journal 96 (June 2008): 1431–1433.
73. Richard H. Pildes, “Foreword: The Constitutionalization of Democratic Politics” Harvard Law Review 118 (November 2004): 79.
74. Michael S. Kang, “De-Rigging Elections: Direct Democracy and the Future of Redistricting Reform” Washington University Law Review 84 (2006): 669.
75. Michael S. Kang, “Sore Loser Laws and Democratic Contestation” Georgetown Law Journal 99 (April 2011): 1030–1036.
76. Michael S. Kang, “The Hydraulics and Politics of Party Regulation” Iowa Law Review 91 (October 2005): 131–187.
77. Adrian Vermeule, Mechanisms of Democracy: Institutional Design Writ Small (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), 8.
78. Adam B. Cox, “Designing Redistricting Institutions” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 5 (2006): 412–424.
79. Adrian Vermeule, “Foreword: System Effects and the Constitution” Harvard Law Review 123 (November 2009): 33–36.
80. Adrian Vermeule, “The Invisible Hand in Legal and Political Theory” Virginia Law Review 96 (October 2010): 1433, 1438–1439.
81. Rosenblum N., On the Side of the Angels, 143.
82. Muirhead R., “A Defense of Party Spirit” 722.