The legal status of political parties: A reassessment of competing paradigms

Columbia Law Review

Volumn 100, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 775-

  Persily, Nathaniel ^a   Cain, Bruce E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043262798     PISSN: 00101958     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1123502     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Two casebooks, for example, now deal exclusively with issues of the legal regulation of politics: Daniel Hays Lowenstein, Election Law: Cases and Materials (1995); Samuel Issacharoff et al., The Law of Democracy: Legal Structure of the Political Process (1998). See generally Symposium, Election Law As its Own Field of Study, 32 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1095-1272 (1999).
2. Two casebooks, for example, now deal exclusively with issues of the legal regulation of politics: Daniel Hays Lowenstein, Election Law: Cases and Materials (1995); Samuel Issacharoff et al., The Law of Democracy: Legal Structure of the Political Process (1998). See generally Symposium, Election Law As its Own Field of Study, 32 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1095-1272 (1999).
3. Two casebooks, for example, now deal exclusively with issues of the legal regulation of politics: Daniel Hays Lowenstein, Election Law: Cases and Materials (1995); Samuel Issacharoff et al., The Law of Democracy: Legal Structure of the Political Process (1998). See generally Symposium, Election Law As its Own Field of Study, 32 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1095-1272 (1999).
4. There are, of course, a few earlier cases, such as the White Primary cases, where courts dabbled in this area, but finding more than a few Supreme Court cases in this area of the law before 1955 presents a challenge. See the White Primary cases: Terry v. Adams,