Exposure of cerium oxide nanoparticles to kidney bean shows disturbance in the plant defense mechanisms

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 278, Issue , 2014, Pages 279-287

  Majumdar, Sanghamitra ^a,b   Peralta Videa, Jose R ^a,b   Bandyopadhyay, Susmita ^a,b   Castillo Michel, Hiram ^c   Hernandez Viezcas, Jose Angel ^a,b   Sahi, Shivendra ^d   Gardea Torresdey, Jorge L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

^b University of California Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology (UC CEIN)   (United States)

^c EUROPEAN SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FACILITY   (France)

^d WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Antioxidant enzymes; Cerium oxide nanoparticles; Phaseolus vulgaris; Synchrotron micro x ray absorption spectroscopy; Translocation

Indexed keywords

ANTIOXIDANTS; CERIUM; CERIUM COMPOUNDS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENZYME ACTIVITY; HISTOLOGY; OXIDES; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEINS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TISSUE; X RAY ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY;

ANTIOXIDANT ENZYME; CERIUM OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; MICRO-X-RAY; PHASEOLUS VULGARIS; TRANSLOCATION;

NANOPARTICLES;

ASCORBATE PEROXIDASE; CATALASE; CERIUM; CERIUM OXIDE; CHLOROPHYLL; GUAIACOL PEROXIDASE; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; NANOPARTICLE; CERIC OXIDE; METAL NANOPARTICLE; PEROXIDASE; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

BIOTRANSFORMATION; CERIUM; CHLOROPHYLL; ENZYME ACTIVITY; HOMEOSTASIS; LIPID; PLANT DEFENSE; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT; DISSOLUTION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EPIDERMIS; HOMEOSTASIS; HYDRODYNAMICS; LIPID PEROXIDATION; LONG TERM EXPOSURE; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PHASEOLUS VULGARIS; PLANT DEFENSE; PLANT LEAF; PLANT ROOT; PLANT STEM; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SYNCHROTRON; VASCULAR TISSUE; DRUG EFFECTS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; PHASEOLUS; PLANT;

ASCORBATE PEROXIDASES; CATALASE; CERIUM; METAL NANOPARTICLES; PEROXIDASE; PHASEOLUS; PLANT COMPONENTS, AERIAL; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANT ROOTS;

EID: 84903384814     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: 18733336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Roco M.C. The long view of nanotechnology development: the national nanotechnology initiative at 10 years. J. Nanopart. Res. 2011, 13:427-445.
2. Liu H.H., Cohen Y. Multimedia environmental distribution of engineered nanomaterials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48:3281-3292.
3. Rico C.M., Majumdar S., Duarte-Gardea M., Peralta-Videa J., Gardea-Torresdey J. Interaction of nanoparticles with edible plants and their possible implications in the food chain. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59:3485-3498.
4. Miralles P., Church T.L., Harris A.T. Toxicity, uptake, and translocation of engineered nanomaterials in vascular plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46:9224-9239.
5. Future_Markets (2012), The global market for nanomaterials 2002-2016: production volumes, revenues and end use markets. Future Markets Inc. http://www.futuremarketsinc.com/index.php%3Foption=com_content%26view=article%26id=176%26Itemid=73.
6. Piccino F., Gottschalk F., Seeger S., Nowack B. Industrial production quantities and uses of ten engineered nanomaterials in Europe and the world. J. Nanopart. Res. 2012, 14:1109.
7. Trovarelli A. Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials 2002, 15-50. Imperial College Press, London.
8. 2 nanoparticles: XANES, density functional, and time-resolved XRD studies. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107:3535-3543.
9. Nel A.E., Madler L., Velegol D., Xia T., Hoek E.M.V., Somasundaran P., Klaessig F., Castranova V., Thompson M. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8:543-557.
10. Auffan M., Rose J., Wiesner M.R., Bottero J.Y. Chemical stability of metallic nanoparticles: a parameter controlling their potential cellular toxicity in vitro. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157:1127-1133.
11. Zhang H., Ji Z., Xia T., Meng H., Low-Kam C., Liu R., Pokhrel S., Lin S., Wang X., Liao Y., Wang M., Li L., Rallo R., Damoiseaux R., Telesca D., Mädler L., Cohen Y., Zink J.I., Nel A.E. Use of metal oxide nanoparticle band gap to develop a predictive paradigm for oxidative stress and acute pulmonary inflammation. ACS Nano 2012, 6:4349-4368.
12. Wang Q., Ma X., Zhang W., Pei H., Chen Y. The impact of cerium oxide nanoparticles on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and its implications for food safety. Metallomics 2012, 4:1105-1112.
13. Rico C.M., Hong J., Morales M.I., Zhao L., Barrios A.C., Zhang J.Y., Peralta-Videa J.R., Gardea-Torresdey J.L. Effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles on rice: a study involving the antioxidant defense system and in vivo fluorescence imaging. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:5635-5642.
14. 2 nanoparticles and assessment of their differential toxicity in four edible plant species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58:3689-3693.
15. Priester J.H., Ge Y., Mielke R.E., Horst A.M., Moritz S.C., Espinosa K., Gelb J., Walker S.L., Nisbet R.M., An Y.J., Schimel J.P., Palmer R.G., Hernandez-Viezcas J.A., Zhao L., Gardea-Torresdey J.L., Holden P.A. Soybean susceptibility to manufactured nanomaterials with evidence for food quality and soil fertility interruption. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2012, 109:2451-2456.
16. 2 and ZnO nanoparticles on cucumber physiological markers and bioaccumulation of Ce and Zn: a life cycle study. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61:11945-11951.
17. Ma Y., Kuang L., He X., Bai W., Ding Y., Zhang Z., Zhao Y., Chai Z. Effects of rare earth oxide nanoparticles on root elongation of plants. Chemosphere 2010, 78:273-279.
18. 2 nanoparticles on soybean (Glycine max) plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:7315-7320.
19. P. Mcclean, S., Cannon, P., Gepts, M., Hudson, S., Jackson, D., Rokhsar, J., Schmutz, C. Vance, Towards a whole genome sequence of common bean, (Phaseolus vulgaris) Background, Approaches, Applications, USDA. http://www.csrees.usda.gov/business/reporting/stakeholder/pdfs/pl_common_bean.pdf.
20. Meliorum Technologies, Inc. website;. http://www.meliorum.com/ceriumoxide.htm.
21. Keller A.A., Wang H., Zhou D., Lenihan H.S., Cherr G., Cardinale B.J., Miller R.R., Ji Z. Stability and aggregation of metal oxide nanoparticles in natural aqueous matrices. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:1962-1967.
22. Hernandez-Viezcas J.A., Castillo-Michel H., Servin A.D., Peralta-Videa J.R., Gardea-Torresdey J.L. Spectroscopic verification of zinc absorption and distribution in the desert plant Prosopis juliflora-velutina (velvet mesquite) grown with ZnO nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 170:346-352.
23. Packer A.P., Lariviere D., Li C., Chen M., Fawcett M.A., Nielsen K., Mattson K., Chatt A., Scriver C., Erhardt L.S. Validation of an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) method for the determination of cerium, strontium, and titanium in ceramic materials used in radiological dispersal devices (RDDs). Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 588:166-172.
24. Susini J., Salomé M., Neuhaeusler U., Dhez O., Eichert D., Fayard B., Somogyi A., Bohic S., Bleuet P., Martinez-Criado G., Tucoulou R., Simionovici A., Barrett M., Drakopoulos R. The X-ray microscopy and micro-spectroscopy facility at the ESRF. Synchrotron Radiat. News 2003, 16:35-43.
25. 2 NPs by corn plants grown in soil: Insight into the uptake mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 225-226:131-138.
26. Ravel B., Newville M. ATHENA and ARTEMIS: interactive graphical data analysis using IFEFFIT. Phys. Scr. 2005, T115:1007-1010.
27. Lichtenthaler H.K., Buschmann C. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: measurement and characterization by UV-VIS spectroscopy. Curr. Protoc. Food Analyt. Chem. 2001, 10.1002/0471142913.faf0403s01.
28. Bradford M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72:248-254.
29. Heath R.L., Packer L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968, 125:189-198.
30. Gallego S.M., Benavídes M.P., Tomaro M.L. Effect of heavy metal ion excess on sunflower leaves: evidence for involvement of oxidative stress. Plant Sci. 1996, 121:151-159.
31. Aebi H. Catalase. Methods of enzymatic analysis 1974, 680. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, Academic Press Inc, New York. H.U. Bergmeyer (Ed.).
32. Nakano Y., Asada K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidases in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981, 22:867-880.
33. Urbanek H., Kuzniak-Gebarowska E., Herka K. Elicitation of defense responses in bean leaves by Botrytis cinerea polygalacturonase. Acta Physiol. Plant. 1991, 13:43-50.
34. Sajith V., Sobhan C.B., Peterson G.P. Experimental investigations on the effects of cerium oxide nanoparticle fuel additives on biodiesel. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2010, 6. Article ID 581407. 10.1155/2010/581407.
35. Park B., Donaldson K., Duffin R., Tran L., Kelly F., Mudway I., Morin J.P., Guest R., Jenkinson P., Samaras Z., Giannouli M., Kouridis H., Martin P., Hazard P. risk assessment of a nanoparticulate cerium oxide-based diesel fuel additive - a case study. Inhalation Toxicol. 2008, 20:547-566.
36. Scattergood, Oxonica Ltd., cerium oxide nanoparticles as fuel additives. 2004, Patent no. WO2004065529.
37. Demeester J., Smedt S., Sanders N., Haustraete J. Light scattering. Methods for Structural Analysis of Protein Pharmaceuticals 2005, 255-259. AAPS, Arlington. W. Jiskoot, D.J. Crommelin (Eds.).
38. Zhang Z., He X., Zhang H., Ma Y., Zhang P., Ding Y., Zhao Y. Uptake and distribution of ceria nanoparticles in cucumber plants. Metallomics 2011, 3:816-822.
39. Bali R., Siegele R., Harris A.T. Biogenic Pt uptake and nanoparticle formation in Medicago sativa and Brassica juncea. J. Nanopart. Res. 2010, 12:3087-3095.
40. Taiz L., Zeiger E.E. Plant Physiology 1998, Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts. 2nd ed.
41. Patil S., Sandberg A., Heckert E., Self W., Seal S. Protein adsorption and cellular uptake of cerium oxide nanoparticles as a function of zeta potential. Biomaterials 2008, 28:4600-4607.
42. Majumdar S., Peralta-Videa J.R., Castillo-Michel H., Hong J., Rico C.M., Gardea-Torresdey J.L. Applications of synchrotron (-XRF to study the distribution of biologically important elements in different environmental matrices: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 755:1-16.
43. Zhang P., Yuhui M., Zhang Z., He X., Zhang J., Guo Z., Tai R., Zhao Y., Chai Z. Biotransformation of ceria nanoparticles in cucumber plants. ACS Nano 2012, 6:9943-9950.
44. Esau K. Anatomy of Seed Plants 1977, Wiley, New York. 2nd ed.
45. Sugiyama A., Yazaki K. Root exudates of legume plants and their involvement in interactions with soil microbes. Secretions and Exudates in Biological Systems, Signaling and Communication in Plants 2012, 27-48. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg. J. Vivanco, F. Baluška (Eds.).
46. Shyam R., Aery N.C. Effect of cerium on growth, dry matter production, biochemical constituents and enzymatic activities of cowpea plants [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2012, 12:1-14.
47. Neto A.D.A., Prisco J.T., Gomes-Filho E. Changes in soluble amino-N, soluble proteins and free amino acids in leaves and roots of salt-stressed maize genotypes. J. Plant Interact. 2009, 4:137-144.
48. Nayer M., Reza H. Effects of drought stress on soluble proteins in two maize varieties. Turk. J. Biol. 2008, 32:23-30.
49. Sharma P., Jha A.B., Dubey R.S., Pessarakli M. Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions. J. Bot. 2012, Article ID 217037. 10.1155/2012/217037.
50. 2, heat shock protein and lipid peroxidation. ACS Nano 2012, 6:9615-9622.
51. Heckert E.G., Karakoti A.S., Seal S., Self W.T. The role of cerium redox state in the SOD mimetic activity of nanoceria. Biomaterials 2008, 29:2705-2709.
52. 2 using a koopmans-like GGA+U approach. J. Phys. Chem. 2012, 116:2443-2452.
53. Ojalvo I., Rokem J.S., Navon G., Goldberg I. 31P NMR study of elicitor treated Phaseolus vulgaris cell suspension cultures. Plant Physiol. 1987, 85:716-719.