Industrial production quantities and uses of ten engineered nanomaterials in Europe and the world

Journal of Nanoparticle Research

Volumn 14, Issue 9, 2012, Pages

  Piccinno, Fabiano ^a,b   Gottschalk, Fadri ^a   Seeger, Stefan ^b   Nowack, Bernd ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL LABORATORIES FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Europe; Nanomaterials; Production quantities

Indexed keywords

CERIUM OXIDE; FULLERENES; II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; OXIDE MINERALS; SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS; SILICA; SILICON; SURVEYS; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; ZINC OXIDE;

ENGINEERED NANOMATERIALS; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EUROPE; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; PRODUCT CATEGORIES; PRODUCTION CAPACITY; PRODUCTION QUANTITY; WORLDWIDE PRODUCTION;

LIFE CYCLE;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; ENGINEERED NANOMATERIAL; FULLERENE; GOLD NANOPARTICLE; IRON OXIDE; NANOMATERIAL; QUANTUM DOT; SILICON DIOXIDE; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZINC OXIDE;

EUROPE; NANOENGINEERING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 84864947585     PISSN: 13880764     EISSN: 1572896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-012-1109-9     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Aitken RJ, Chaudhry MQ, Boxall ABA, Hull M (2006) Manufacture and use of nanomaterials: Current status in the UK and global trends. Occup Med 56:300-"306 (Pubitemid 44304820)
2. Barthel H, Heinemann M, Stintz M, Wessely B (1999) Particle sizes of fumed silica. Part Part Syst Charact 16:169-"176
3. Berube DM, Searson EM, Morton TS, Cummings CL (2010) Project on emerging nanotechnologies-consumer product inventory evaluated. Nanotechnol Law Bus 7:152-"163
4. Blaser SA, Scheringer M, MacLeod M, Hungerbuhler K (2008) Estimation of cumulative aquatic exposure and risk due to silver: Contribution of nano-functionalized plastics and textiles. Sci Total Environ 390:396-"409 (Pubitemid 350256822)
5. Bleeker EAJ, Cassee FR, Geertsma RE, de Jong WH, Heugens EHW, Koers-Jacquemijns M, van de Meent D, Oomen AG,Popma J, Rietveld AG, Wijnhoven SWP (2012) Interpretation and implications of the European Commission Recommendation on the definition of nanomaterial, RIVM Letter report 601358001/2012. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthove, The Netherlands
6. Bosch A, Maier M, Morfeld P (2012) Nanosilica? Clarifications are necessary! Nanotoxicology 6:611-"613
7. Borm PJA, Robbins D, Haubold S, Kuhlbusch T, Fissan H, Donaldson K, Schins R, Stone V, Kreyling W, Lademann J, Krutmann J, Warheit D, Oberdorster E (2006) The potential risks of nanomaterials: A review carried out for ECETOC. Part Fiber Toxicol 3:11
8. Cientifica (2004) Nanotubes, executive summary. http://www. cientifica.com/www/summarys/Nanotubes-2004-ExSum. pdf
9. Eklund PC, Ajayan P, Blackmon R, Hart AJ, Kong J, Pradhan B, Rao A, Rinzler A (2007) Assessment of international research and development on carbon nanotube manufacturing and applications. WTEC Panel Report. World Technology Evaluation Center, Inc. Available at http://www.wtec.org/cnm/CNM-final-report. pdf
10. EU (2011) Commission Recommendation of 18 October 2011 on the definition of nanomaterial (2011/696/EU). O. J. L 275:38-"40
11. Forster SP, Olveira S, Seeger S (2011) Nanotechnology in the market: Promises and realities. Int J Nanotechnol 8:592-613
12. Gottschalk F, Nowack B (2011) Release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment. J Environ Monit 13: 1145-"1155
13. Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz RW, Nowack B (2009) Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions. Environ Sci Technol 43:9216-"9222
14. Gottschalk F, Scholz RW, Nowack B (2010a) Probabilistic material flow modeling for assessing the environmental exposure to compounds: Methodology and an application to engineered nano-TiO2 particles. Environ Model Softw 25:320-"332
15. Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz RW, Nowack B (2010b) Possibilities and limitations of modeling environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials by probabilistic material flow analysis. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:1036-"1048
16. Hamilton MB (2009) Online survey response rates and times background and guidance for industry. Ipathia, Inc./SuperSurvey. http://www.supersurvey.com/ papers/supersur vey-white-paper-response-rates.htm
17. Healy ML, Dahlben LJ, Isaacs JA (2008) Environmental assessment of single-walled carbon nanotube processes. J Ind Ecol 12:376-"393
18. Hendren CO, Mesnard X, Dröge J, Wiesner MR (2011) Estimating production data for five engineered nanomaterials as a basis for exposure assessment. Environ Sci Technol 45:2562-"2569
19. International Organization for Standardization ISO (2008) Technical specification ISO/TS 27687:2008(E): Nanotechnologies-Terminology and definitions for nanoobjects-nanoparticle, nanofibre and nanoplate
20. Klaine SJ, Alvarez PJJ, Batley GE, Fernandes TF, Handy RD, Lyon DY, Mahendra S, McLaughlin MJ, Lead JR (2008) Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1825-"1851
21. Krug HF, Wick P (2011) Nanotoxicology: An interdisciplinary challenge. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:1260-"1278
22. Kuzma J (2005) The nanotechnology-biology interface: Exploring models for oversight. Workshop Report. Available at http://www.hhh.umn.edu/img/assets/ 9685/nanotech-jan06.pdf
23. Lo LY, Li Y, Yeung KW, Yuen CWM (2007) Indicating the development stage of nanotechnology in the textile and clothing industry. Int J Nanotechnol 4:667-"679
24. Lövestam G, Rauscher H, Roebben G, Sokull Klüttgen B, Gibson N, Putaud JP, Stamm H (2010) Considerations on a definition of nanomaterial for regulatory purposes. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. ISBN 978-92-79-16014-1. doi:10.2788/98686
25. Mueller NC, Nowack B (2008) Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 42:4447-"4453 (Pubitemid 351842389)
26. NanoCentral (2010) NanoPerspective-The nanotechnology resource library. NanoCentral, Sedgefield, Durham, UK. http://www.nanocentral.eu/nanoperspective
27. Nightingale P, Morgan M, Rafols I, van Zwanenberg P (2008) Nanomaterials innovation systems: their structure, dynamics and regulation. A Report for the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, UK
28. Nowack B, Bucheli TD (2007) Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Pollut 150:5-"22 (Pubitemid 47592962)
29. Nowack B, Krug HF, Height M (2011) 120 years of nanosilver history: Implications for policy makers. Environ Sci Technol 45:1177-"1183
30. Oberdörster G, Oberdörster E, Oberdörster J (2005) Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113:823-"839 (Pubitemid 40984181)
31. Park B (2007) Current and future applications of nanotechnology. Environ Sci Technol 24:1-"18
32. Ray PC, Yu HT, Fu PP (2009) Toxicity and environmental risks of nanomaterials: Challenges and future needs. J Environ Sci Health Part C 27:1-"35
33. 2 production as a basis for exposure assessment. Environ Sci Technol 43:4227-"4233
34. Schaefer DW, Justice RS (2007) How nano are nanocomposites? Macromolecules 40:8501-"8517 (Pubitemid 350241344)
35. Scheringer M, MacLeod M, Behra R, Sigg L, Hungerbuhler H (2010) Environmental risks associated with nanoparticulate silver used as biocide. Household Pers Care Today 1:34-"37
36. Schmid K, Riediker M (2008) Use of nanoparticles in Swiss industry: A targeted survey. Environ Sci Technol 42:2253-2260 (Pubitemid 351482883)
37. Som C, Berges M, Chaudhry Q, Dusinska M, Fernandes TF, Olsen SI, Nowack B (2010) The importance of life cycle concepts for the development of safe nanoproducts. Toxicology 269:160-"169
38. Stark WJ, Pratsinis SE (2002) Aerosol flame reactors for manufacture of nanoparticles. Powder Technol 126:103-"108 (Pubitemid 34628873)
39. Stone V, Nowack B, Baun A, van den Brink N, von der Kammer F, Dusinska M, Handy R, Hankin S, Hassellöv M, Joner E, Fernandes TF (2010) Nanomaterials for environmental studies: Classification, reference material issues, and strategies for physico-chemical characterisation. Sci Total Environ 408:1745-"1754
40. Thayer AM (2000) Firms find a new field of dreams. Chem Eng News 78:36-"38
41. United Nations Environment Programme UNEP (2007) Chapter 7: Emerging challenges-nanotechnology and the environment, Geo Year Book 2007
42. US EPA (2010a) Nanomaterial case studies: Nanoscale titanium dioxide in water treatment and in topical sunscreen. US Environmental Protection Agency, Report EPA/600/R-09/057F
43. US EPA (2010b) State of the science literature review: Nano titanium dioxide environmental matters. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
44. Wiesner MR, Lowry GV, Jones KL, Hochella MF, Di Giulio RT, Casman E, Bernhardt ES (2009) Decreasing uncertainties in assessing environmental exposure, risk, and ecological implications of nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 43:6458-"6462
45. Wijnhoven SWP, Dekkers S, Kool M, Jongeneel WP, De Jong WH 2010: Nanomaterials in consumer products. Update of products on the European market in 2010. RIVM Report 340370003/2010. http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/ 340370003.pdf