The application of precisely controlled functional electrical stimulation to the shoulder, elbow and wrist for upper limb stroke rehabilitation: A feasibility study

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Meadmore, Katie L ^a   Exell, Timothy A ^a   Hallewell, Emma ^a   Hughes, Ann Marie ^a   Freeman, Chris T ^a   Kutlu, Mustafa ^a   Benson, Valerie ^a   Rogers, Eric ^a   Burridge, Jane H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

FES; Iterative learning control; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Upper limb

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARM; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DELTOID MUSCLE; ELBOW; EXTENSOR MUSCLE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FINGER; FUGL MEYER AND ACTION RESEARCH ARM TEST SCORE; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMAN; ITERATIVE LEARNING CONTROL; KINEMATICS; MALE; MECHANICAL ARM SUPPORT; MEDICAL DEVICE; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REHABILITATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SHOULDER; TASK PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT DURATION; TRICEPS BRACHII MUSCLE; WRIST; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONVALESCENCE; ELECTROSTIMULATION THERAPY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; ELBOW; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SHOULDER; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY; WRIST;

EID: 84903350659     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-105     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Royal College of Physicians, National Clinical Guideline for Stroke 2012
2. National Audit Office Department of Health, Progress in Improving Stroke Care 2010
3. Stroke statistics. Scarborough P, Peto V, Bhatnagar P, Kaur A, Leal J, Luengo-Fernandez R, Gray A, Rayner M, Allender S, British Heart Foundation Statistics Database 2009
4. Long-term neuropsychological and functional outcomes in stroke survivors: current evidence and perspectives for new research. Feigin VL, Barker-Collo S, McNaughton H, Brown P, Kerse N, Int J Stroke 2008 3 33 40 10.1111/j.1747-4949. 2008.00177.x 18705913
5. Rehabilitation of arm function after stroke. Literature review. Oujamaa L, Rlave I, Froger J, Mottet D, Pelissier J-Y, Annuals Phys Rehabil Med 2009 52 269 293 10.1016/j.rehab.2008.10.003
6. Relation between stimulation characteristics and clinical outcome of the upper extremity in stroke. De Kroon JR, IJzerman MJ, Chae J, Lankhorst GJ, Zilvold G, Rehabil Med 2005 37 65 74 10.1080/16501970410024190
7. Gait and hand function enhancement following training with a multi-segment hybrid-orthosis stimulation system in stroke patients. Alon G, Ring H, J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2003 12 209 216 10.1016/S1052-3057(03)00076-4 17903929
8. Functional electrical stimulation (fes) may modify the poor prognosis of stroke survivors with severe motor loss of the upper extremity. Alon G, Levitt AF, McCarthy PA, Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008 87 627 636 10.1097/PHM. 0b013e31817fabc1 18645322
9. A personalized sensor controlled microstimulator system for arm rehabilitation poststroke. Part 2. objective outcomes and patients' perspectives. Burridge JH, Turk R, Merrill D, Dibb B, Hughes AM, Sparrow O, Roberts H, Davis R, Neuromodulation 2011 14 80 88 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2010. 00310.x 21992167
10. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves severe hand dysfunction for individuals with chronic stroke: a pilot study. Santos M, Zahmer LH, McKieran BJ, Mahnken JD, Quaney B, J Neurol PhysTherapy 2006 30 175 183
11. Rehabilitation of reaching and grasping function in severe hemiplegic patients using functional electrical stimulation therapy. Thrasher T, Zivanovic V, Mciiroy W, Popovic M, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008 22 706 714 10.1177/1545968308317436 18971385
12. Accelerometer-triggered electrical stimulation for reach and grasp in chronic stroke patients: a pilot study. Mann G, Taylor P, Lane R, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011 25 774 781 10.1177/1545968310397200 21628605
13. Effect of visual distraction and auditory feedback on patient effort during robot assisted movement training after stroke. Secoli R, Milotm M, Rosati G, Reinkensmeyer D, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011 8 21 10.1186/1743-0003-8-21 21513561
14. Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. Lotze M, Braun C, Birbaumer N, Anders S, Cohen L, Brain 2003 126 866 872 10.1093/brain/awg079 12615644
15. Phase-lead iterative learning control algorithms for functional electrical stimulation based stroke rehabilitation. Freeman CT, Tong D, Meadmore KL, Cai Z, Rogers E, Hughes AM, Burridge JH, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers-Part I Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, Volume 225 2011 850 859
16. Iterative learning control in healthcare: electrical stimulation and robotic-assisted upper limb stroke rehabilitation. Freeman CT, Rogers E, Hughes AM, Burridge JH, Meadmore K, IEEE Control Syst Mag 2012 32 18 43
17. Exell TA, Freeman CT, Meadmore KL, Hughes AM, Hallewell E, Rogers E A stroke rehabilitation system utilising electrical stimulation and Microsoft Kinect. In International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.: Burridge JH 2013
18. Feasibility of iterative learning control mediated by functional electrical stimulation for reaching after stroke. Hughes AM, Freeman CT, Burridge JH, Chappell PH, Lewin PL, Rogers E, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009 23 559 568 10.1177/1545968308328718 19190087
19. Stroke participants perceptions of robotic and electrical stimulation therapy: a new approach. Hughes AM, Burridge JH, Freeman CT, Donovan-Hall M, Chappell PH, Lewin PL, Rogers E, Dibb B, Disabil Rehabil Assist Techno 2011 6 130 138 10.3109/17483107.2010.509882
20. Functional electrical stimulation mediated by iterative learning control and 3d robotics reduces motor impairment in chronic stroke. Meadmore K, Hughes AM, Freeman CT, Cai Z, Tong D, Burridge JH, Rogers E, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012 9 32 42 10.1186/1743-0003-9-32 22676920
21. Electrode Array-based Electrical Stimulation using ILC with Restricted Input Subspace. Freeman CT, Control Eng Pract 2014 23 2 32 43
22. Upper limb electrical stimulation using input-output linearization and iterative learning control. Freeman CT, IEEE Control Systems Tech In Press
23. Computational models of upper limb motion during functional reaching tasks for application in FES based stroke rehabilitation. Freeman CT, Exell T, Meadmore KL, Hallewell E, Hughes A-M, Biomed Eng J In Press
24. A performance for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Lyle RC, Int J Rehabil Res 1981 4 483 492 10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001 7333761
25. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S, Scand J Rehabil Med 1975 7 13 31 1135616
26. The intra- and inter-rater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Van der Lee JH, De Groot V, Beckerman H, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001 82 14 19 10.1053/apmr.2001.18668 11239280
27. Comparison of the action research arm test and the fugl-meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke. Rabadi MH, Rabadi FM, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006 87 962 966 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.036 16813784
28. Participant feedback in the evaluation of novel stroke rehabilitation technologies. Meadmore KL, Hughes AM, Freeman CT, Benson V, Burridge JH, J Rehabil Robot In Press
29. Recent trends in robot-assisted therapy environments to improve real-life functional performance after stroke. Johnson MJ, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2006 3 29 10.1186/1743-0003-3-29 17176474
30. Wearable neural prostheses: restoration of sensory-motor function by transcutaneous electrical stimulation. Micera S, Keller T, Lawence M, Morari M, Popovic DB, IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2010 29 3 64 69 20659859
31. Automated setup of functional electrical stimulation for drop foot using a novel 64 channel prototype stimulator and electrode array: results from a gait-lab based study. Heller BW, Clarke AJ, Good TR, Healey TJ, Nair S, Pratt EJ, Medical Eng Physics 2013 35 1 74 81 10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.03.012
32. An electrode configuration technique using an electrode matrix arrangement for FES-based upper arm rehabilitation systems. O'Dwyer SB, O'Keeffe DT, Coote S, Lyons GM, Medical Eng Physics 2006 28 2 166 176 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.03.010
33. Automatic determination of the optimal shape of a surface electrode: selective stimulation. Popovic DB, Popovic MB, J Neurosci Methods 2009 178 174 181 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.12.003 19109996
34. Multifield surface electrode for selective electrical stimulation. Popovic-Bijelic A, Bijelic G, Jorgovanovic N, Bojanic D, Popovic MB, Popovoic DB, Artif Organs 2005 29 6 448 452 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2005.29075.x 15926980
35. Optimisation of hand posture stimulation using an electrode array and iterative learning control. Exell TA, Freeman CT, Meadmore KL, Hughes AM, Hallewell E, Burridge J, J Automatic Control 2013 21 1 1 5 10.2298/JAC1301001E
36. Influence of gravity compensation training on synergistic movement patterns of the upper extremity after stroke, a pilot study. Krabben T, Prange GB, Molie BI, Stienen AHA, Jannink MJA, Buurke JH, Rietman JS, J NeuroEng Rehabil 2012 9 44 55 10.1186/1743-0003-9-44 22824488
37. An explorative, cross-sectional study into abnormal muscular coupling during reach in chronic stroke patients. Prange GB, Jannink MJA, Stienen AHA, van der Kooij H, IJzerman MJ MJ, Hermens HJ, J NeuroEng Rehabil 2012 7 14 23
38. Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD, J Mot Behav 2004 36 212 224 10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224 15130871