Stroke participants' perceptions of robotic and electrical stimulation therapy: A new approach

Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 130-138

  Hughes, Ann Marie ^a   Burridge, Jane ^a   Freeman, Chris T ^a   Donnovan Hall, Maggie ^a   Chappell, Paul H ^a   Lewin, Paul L ^a   Rogers, Eric ^a   Dibb, Bridget ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

arm; electrical stimulation; perception; rehabilitation; robot; Stroke; technology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL TRIAL; ELECTROSTIMULATION THERAPY; FEMALE; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSIOTHERAPY; ROBOTICS; STROKE;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; FEMALE; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; ROBOTICS; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 79952373660     PISSN: 17483107     EISSN: 17483115     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2010.509882     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. van der Putten JJMF, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999;66:480-484. (Pubitemid 29145683)
2. Hendricks HT, van Limbeek J, Geurts AC, Zwarts MJ. Motor recovery after stroke: A systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1629-1637. (Pubitemid 35304145)
3. National Audit Office. Reducing brain damage: Faster access to better stroke care. London: National Audit Office; 2005. HC 452.
4. Winstein CJ, Rose DK, Tan SM, Lewthwaite R, Chui HC, Azen SP. A randomized controlled comparison of upperextremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: A pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:620-628. (Pubitemid 38881052)
5. Inaba M, Edberg E, Montgomery J, Gillis MK. Effectiveness of functional training, active exercise, and resistive exercise for patients with hemiplegia. Phys Ther 1973;53:28-35.
6. Magill RA. Motor learning - concepts and applications. 5th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill International Editions; 1998.
7. Prange GB, Jannink MA, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, Hermens H, IJzerman MJ. Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006;43:171-184.
8. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs H.I. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:111-121. (Pubitemid 351287594)
9. Intercollegiate working Party for Stroke.National clinical guidelines for stroke. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2004.
10. De Kroon JR, van der Lee JH, Izerman MJ, Lankhorst GJ. Therapeutic electrical stimulation to improve motor control and functional abilities of the upper extremity after stroke: A systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2002;16:350-360. (Pubitemid 34746039)
11. Burridge JH, Ladouceur M. Clinical and therapeutic applications of neuromuscular stimulation: A review of current use and speculation into future developments. Neuromodulation 2001;4:147-154.
12. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning: A behavioural emphasis. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Part 3 Motor Learning; 1999. pp 261-285.
13. De Kroon JR, Ijzerman MJ, Chae J, Lankhorst GJ, Zilvold G. Relation between stimulation characteristics and clinical outcome in studies using electrical stimulation to improve motor control of the upper extremity in stroke. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:65-74. (Pubitemid 40439460)
14. Francisco G, Chae J, Chawla H, Kirshblum S, Zorowitz R, Lewis G, Pang S. Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation for improving the arm function of acute stroke survivors: A randomized pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:570-575. (Pubitemid 28222171)
15. Freeman CT, Hughes AM, Burridge JH, Chappell PH, Lewin PL, Rogers E. A robotic workstation for stroke rehabilitation of the upper extremity using FES. Med Eng Phys 2009;31: 364-373. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.05.008.
16. Freeman CT, Hughes AM, Burridge JH, Chappell PH, Lewin PL, Rogers E. Iterative learning control of FES applied to the upper extremity for rehabilitation. Control Eng Pract, 2009;31:364-373. DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac. 2008.08.003.
17. Yardley L, Kirby SE. Evaluation of booklet-based selfmanagement of systems in Meniere's disease: A randomised controlled trial. Psychosom Med 2006;68:762-769. DOI: 10.1097/01.psy.0000232269.17906.92. (Pubitemid 44454647)
18. Day HI, Jutai JJ. Measuring the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: The PIADS. Can J Rehabil 1996;9:159-168.
19. Agarwal G, Triolo RJ, Kobetic R, Miller M, Bieri C, Kukke S, Rohde L, Davis JA. Long-term user perception of an implanted neuroprosthesis for exercise, standing and transfers after spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 2003;40:241-252. (Pubitemid 36666325)
20. Taylor PN, Burridge JH, Dunkerley AL, Lamb A, Wood DE, Norton JA, Swain ID. Patients' perceptions of the Odstock Dropped Foot Stimulator (ODFS). Clin Rehabil 1999;13: 439-446. (Pubitemid 29425639)
21. Krebs HI, Hogan N, Aisen ML, Volpe BT. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1998;6:75-87. (Pubitemid 28167922)
22. Coote S, Stokes EK. Robot mediated therapy: Attitudes of patients and therapists towards the first prototype of the GENTLE/s system. Technol Disabil 2003;15:27-34. (Pubitemid 36740637)
23. Lee M, Rittenhouse M, Abdullah HA. Design issues for therapeutic robot systems: Results from a survey of physiotherapists. J Intell Robotic Syst 2005;42:239-252. (Pubitemid 41117839)
24. Doornebosch AJ, Cools HJM, Slee-Turkenburg MEC, van Elk MG, Schoone-Harmsen M. Robot-mediated ACtive REhabilitation (ACRE2) for the hemiplegic upper limb after a stroke: A pilot study. Technol Disabil 2007;19: 199-203. (Pubitemid 351233106)
25. Stieglitz T, Schuettler M, editors. Clinical effectiveness and participant perceptions of an implanted closed-loop neurostimulator- sensor system for arm rehabilitation post-stroke. In: 13th Annual Conference of the International Functional Electrical Stimulation Society ''From movement to mind''; 08 Sep 21; Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter; 2008.
26. Joffe H, Yardley L. Content and thematic analysis. In: Marks D, Yardley L, editors. Research methods for clinical and health psychology. London: Sage; 2004.
27. Hughes AM, Freeman CT, Burridge J.H., Chappell PH, Lewin PL, Rogers E. Feasibility of iterative learning control mediated by functional electrical stimulation for reaching after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23: 559-568.
28. Hughes AM, Freeman CT, Burridge JH, Chappell PH, Lewin PL, Rogers E. Shoulder and elbow muscle activity during fully supported trajectory tracking in people who have had a stroke. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2010;20:465-476. ISSN 1050-6411.
29. van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Med 2001;33:110-113. (Pubitemid 32479326)
30. Flick U. Qualitative research - state of the art. Soc Sci Inform 2002;41:5-24. (Pubitemid 36657001)
31. Nielsen J. Usability engineering. Boston, MA: Academic Press; 1993.
32. Damodaran L. User involvement in the systems design process - a practical guide for users. Behav Inform Technol 1996;15:363-377. (Pubitemid 126595173)
33. Stein J, Hughes R, Fasoli S, Krebs H.I, Hogan N. Clinical applications of robots in rehabilitation. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med 2005;17:217-230.
34. Riener R, Nef T, Colombo G. Robot aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities. Med Biol Eng Comput 2005;43:2-10. (Pubitemid 40277659)
35. Kiesler S, Hinds P. Human robot interaction. Hum Comput Interact 2004;19:1-8.