Pedestrian crossing situations: Quantification of comfort boundaries to guide intervention timing

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 71, Issue , 2014, Pages 261-266

  Lubbe, Nils ^a,b   Rosén, Erik ^c  

^a Toyota Motor Europe NV/SA   (Belgium)

^b CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^c AUTOLIV RESEARCH   (Sweden)

Author keywords

AEB; Brake reaction time; Comfort boundaries; Driver behaviour; Forward collision warning; Pedestrian

Indexed keywords

BRAKES; CROSSWALKS; FOOTBRIDGES; SPEED;

AEB; BEHAVIOURAL CHANGES; DRIVER BEHAVIOUR; FORWARD COLLISION WARNINGS; LONGITUDINAL DISTANCE; PEDESTRIAN; PEDESTRIAN DUMMIES; SYSTEM INTERACTIONS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ADULT; CAR; CAR DRIVING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INJURIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; REACTION TIME; TIME; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; WALKING; YOUNG ADULT;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ADULT; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; AUTOMOBILES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; WALKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84903176502     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.05.029     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Brännström, M., 2012. Decision-making in automotive collision avoidance systems. Dissertation Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg.
2. E. Coelingh, A. Eidehall, and M. Bengtsson Collision warning with full auto brake and pedestrian detection-a practical example of automatic emergency braking Proceedings of the 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems Madeira Island, Portugal 2010 155 160
3. S.R. Dixon, C.D. Wickens, and J.S. McCarley On the independence of compliance and reliance: are automation false alarms worse than misses? Human Factors 49 4 2007 564 572 (Pubitemid 47122687)
4. B. Efron, and R.J. Tibshirani An Introduction to the Bootstrap 1994 Chapman & Hall
5. Grover, C., Knight, I., Okoro, F., Simmons, I., Couper, G., Massie, P., Smith, B., 2008. Automated Emergency Brake Systems: Technical Requirements, Costs and Benefits. TRL Published Project Report 227 (Accessed 2009-02-13 from ec.europa.eu/enterprise/automotive/projects/report-aebs.pdf).
6. Gårder, P., 1982. Konfliktstudier i landsvägskorsningar. Lunds universitet, LTH, instutionen för teknik och samhälle, trafik och väg. Bulletin 42.
7. J. Jermakian, and D. Zuby Primary Pedestrian Crash Scenarios: Factors Relevant to the Design of Pedestrian Detection Systems 2011 IIHS Publication Arlington, USA
8. J.E. Källhammer, K. Smith, J. Karlsson, and E. Hollnagel Shouldn't the car react as the driver expects? Proceedings of the 4th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design Stevenson, WA 2007
9. Källhammer, J.E., 2011. Using False Alarms when Developing Automotive Active Safety Systems. Dissertation Linköping University.
10. J.D. Lee, D.V. McGehee, T.L. Brown, and M.L. Reyes Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator Hum. Factors 44 2 2002 314 334 (Pubitemid 35315402)
11. M. Lindman, A. Ödblom, E. Bergvall, A. Eidehall, B. Svanberg, and T. Lukaszewicz Benefit estimation model for pedestrian auto brake functionality 4th International Conference on Expert Symposium on Accident Research (ESAR) Hannover, Germany, paper number 11 2010
12. M. Ljung Aust, and J. Engström A conceptual framework for requirement specification and evaluation of active safety functions Theoret. Issues Ergon. Sci. 12 1 2011 44 65
13. Ljung Aust, M., Dombrovskis, S., 2013. Understanding and improving driver compliance with safety system feedback. Proceedings of the 23rd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Seoul, Republic of Korea, Paper Number 13-0455.
14. Robinson, B., Hulshof, W., Cookson, R., Cuerden, R., Hutchins, R., Delmonte, E., 2011. Cost Benefit Evaluation of Advanced Primary Safety Systems-Final Report. TRL Published Project Report 586.
15. E. Rosén, J.E. Källhammer, D. Eriksson, M. Nentwich, R. Fredriksson, and K. Smith Pedestrian injury mitigation by autonomous braking Accid. Analysis Prevent. 42 2010 1949 1957
16. E. Rosén, J. Lang, and O. Bostrom Tests of sensors in line with proposed Euro NCAP procedure Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium and Exhibition on Sophisticated Car Occupant Safety Systems (Airbag 2012) Karlsruhe, Germany 2012
17. Rosén, E., 2013. Autonomous Emergency Braking for Vulnerable Road Users. Proceedings of IRCOBI Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, paper number 13-71.
18. P. Seiniger, O. Bartels, C. Pastor, and M. Wisch An open simulation approach to identify chances and limitations for vulnerable road user (VRU) active safety Traffic Injury Prevent. 14 2013 S2 S12
19. H. Summala Towards understanding motivational and emotional factors in driver behaviour: comfort through satisficing Cacciabue Modelling Driver Behaviour in Automotive Environments: Critical Issues in Driver Interactions with Intelligent Transport Systems 2007 Springer
20. N. Tiemann, W. Branz, and D. Schramm Situation analysis for vulnerable road user protection using a pedestrian motion model Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium and Exhibition on Sophisticated Car Occupant Safety Systems (Airbag 2010) Karlsruhe, Germany 2010