Emergency physician perspectives on central venous catheterization in the emergency department: A survey-based study

Academic Emergency Medicine

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 623-630

  Ballard, Dustin W ^a,c   Reed, Mary E ^b   Rauchwerger, Adina S ^b   Chettipally, Uli K ^a,d   Offerman, Steven R ^a,c   Mark, Dustin G ^a,e   Vinson, David R ^a,f  

^a KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DIVISION OF RESEARCH   (United States)

^c KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^d San Francisco Medical Center   (United States)

^e Oakland Medical Center   (United States)

^f Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergy   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION; ECHOGRAPHY; EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN; EMERGENCY WARD; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; REVIEW; SEPSIS; SEPTIC SHOCK; SUBCLAVIAN VEIN;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CALIFORNIA; CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; SELF REPORT; SEPSIS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 84903141935     PISSN: 10696563     EISSN: 15532712     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/acem.12386     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1368-77.
2. Rivers EP, Coba V, Whitmill M,. Early goal-directed therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: a contemporary review of the literature. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2008; 21: 128-40.
3. Nguyen HB, Corbett SW, Steele R, et al. Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 1105-12.
4. Walkey AJ, Wiener RS, Lindenauer PK,. Utilization patterns and outcomes associated with central venous catheter in septic shock: a population-based study. Crit Care Med 2013; 41: 1450-7.
5. Rivers EP, Katranji M, Jaehne KA, et al. Early interventions in severe sepsis and septic shock: a review of the evidence one decade later. Minerva Anestesiol 2012; 78: 712-24.
6. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 296-327.
7. Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 2004; 32: 858-73.
8. Society of Critical Care Medicine. Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Available at: www.survivingsepsis.org. Accessed Feb 23, 2014.
9. De Miguel-Yanes JM, Andueza-Lillo JA, González-Ramallo VJ, Pastor L, Muñoz J,. Failure to implement evidence-based clinical guidelines for sepsis at the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2006; 24: 553-9.
10. Gao F, Melody T, Daniels DF, Giles S, Fox S,. The impact of compliance with 6-hour and 24-hour sepsis bundles on hospital mortality in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective observational study. Crit Care 2005; 9: R764-70.
11. Brunkhorst FM, Engel C, Ragaller M, et al. Practice and perception-a nationwide survey of therapy habits in sepsis. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 2719-25.
12. Glickman SW, Krubert C, Koppenhaver J, Glickman LT, Schulman KA, Cairns CB,. Increased rate of central venous catheterization procedures in community EDs. Am J Emerg Med 2010; 28: 208-12.
13. Carlbom DJ, Rubenfeld GD,. Barriers to implementing protocol-based sepsis resuscitation in the emergency department-results of a national survey. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 2525-32.
14. Burney M, Underwood J, McEvoy S, et al. Early detection and treatment of severe sepsis in the emergency department: identifying barriers to implementation of a protocol-based approach. J Emerg Nurs 2012; 38: 512-7.
15. McGee DC, Gould MK,. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1123-33.
16. Taylor RW, Palagiri AV,. Central venous catheterization. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 1390-6.
17. Eisen LA, Narasimhan M, Berger JS, Mayo PH, Rosen MJ, Schneider RF,. Mechanical complications of central venous catheters. J Intensive Care Med 2006; 21: 40-6.
18. Nguyen HB, Kuan WS, Batech M, et al. Outcome effectiveness of the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle with addition of lactate clearance as a bundle item: a multi-national evaluation. Crit Care 2011; 15: R229.
19. Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, et al. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ 2003; 327 (7411): 361.
20. Denys BG, Uretsky BF, Reddy PS,. Ultrasound-assisted cannulation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison to the external landmark-guided technique. Circulation 1993; 87: 1557-62.
21. Miller AH, Roth BA, Mills TJ, Woody JR, Longmoor CE, Foster B,. Ultrasound guidance versus the landmark technique for the placement of central venous catheters in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2002; 9: 800-5.
22. Leung J, Duffy M, Finckh A,. Real-time ultrasonographically-guided internal jugular vein catheterization in the emergency department increases success rates and reduces complications: a randomized, prospective study. Ann Emerg Med 2006; 48: 540-7.
23. Bodenham AR,. Can you justify not using ultrasound guidance for central venous access? Crit Care 2006; 10: 175.
24. American College of Emergency Physicians. Ultrasound. Available at: http://www.acep.org/ClinicalPractice-Management/Ultrasound/. Accessed Dec 20, 2013.
25. Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, Wachter RM, Markowitz AJ,. Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) 2001; 43: 1-668.
26. American College of Surgeons. [ST-60] Revised Statement on Recommendations for Use of Real-time Ultrasound Guidance for Placement of Central Venous Catheters [by the American College of Surgeons]. Available at: http://www.facs.org/fellows-info/statements/st-60.html. Accessed Feb 23, 2014.
27. Backlund BH, Hopkins E, Kendall JL,. Ultrasound guidance for central venous access by emergency physicians in Colorado. West J Emerg Med 2012; 13: 320-5.
28. Woo MY, Frank J, Lee AC, et al. Effectiveness of a novel training program for emergency medicine residents in ultrasound-guided insertion of central venous catheters. CJEM 2009; 11: 343-8.
29. Ault MJ, Rosen BT, Ault B,. The use of tissue models for vascular access training: phase I of the procedural patient safety initiative. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21: 514-7.
30. Blue Phantom, CAE Healthcare. Available at: http://www.bluephantom.com/. Accessed Dec 20, 2013.
31. Whippy A, Skeath M, Crawford B, et al. Kaiser Permanente's performance improvement system, part 3: multisite improvements in care for patients with sepsis. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2011; 37: 483-93.
32. Dillman DA,. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York, NY: Wiley Interscience, 1978.
33. Reade MC, Huang DT, Bell D, et al. Variability in management of early severe sepsis. Emerg Med J 2010; 27: 110-5.
34. Mikkelsen ME, Gaieski DF, Goyal M, et al. Factors associated with nonadherence to early goal-directed therapy in the ED. Chest 2010; 138: 551-8.
35. Ramirez-Schrempp D, Dorfman DH, Tien I, Liteplo AS,. Bedside ultrasound in pediatric emergency medicine fellowship programs in the United States: little formal training. Pediatr Emerg Care 2008; 24: 664-7.
36. Vinson DR, Ballard DW, Stevenson MD, et al. Predictors of unattempted central venous catheterization in septic patients eligible for early goal-directed therapy. West J Emerg Med 2014; 15: 67-75.
37. Vinson DR, Ballard DW, Hance LG, et al. Bleeding complications of central venous catheterization in septic patients with abnormal hemostasis. Am J Emerg Med 2014 Mar 20 [Epub ahead of print].
38. Lewis JD, Asch DA, Ginsberg GG, et al. Primary care physicians' decisions to perform flexible sigmoidoscopy. J Gen Intern Med 1999; 14: 297-302.
39. Carek PJ, King DE, Hunter M, Gilbert GE,. Practice profiles, procedures, and personal rewards according to the sex of the physician. South Med J 2003; 96: 767-71.
40. Brehaut JC, Graham ID, Wood TJ, et al. Measuring acceptability of clinical decision rules: validation of the Ottawa acceptability of decision rules instrument (OADRI) in four countries. Med Decis Making 2010; 30: 398-408.
41. Croskerry P, Abbass A, Wu AW,. Emotional influences in patient safety. J Patient Saf 2010; 6: 199-205.
42. Croskerry P,. Diagnostic failure: a cognitive and affective approach. In:, Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI, (editors). Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation (Volume 2: Concepts and Methodology). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2005.
43. Hebert JR, Clemow L, Pbert L, Ockene IS, Ockene JK,. Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures. Int J Epidemiol 1995; 24: 389-98.
44. Mello MJ, Merchant RC, Clark MA,. Surveying emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med 2013; 20: 409-12.