A systematic review of phenotypic responses to between-population outbreeding

Environmental Evidence

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Whitlock, Raj ^a   Stewart, Gavin B ^b   Goodman, Simon J ^c   Piertney, Stuart B ^d   Butlin, Roger K ^e   Pullin, Andrew S ^f   Burke, Terry ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^f BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conservation Genetics; Heterosis; Intraspecific Hybridisation; Line cross Analysis; Outbreeding; Outbreeding Depression; Outcrossing; Phenotypic Response

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902970746     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20472382     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2047-2382-2-13     Document Type: Article

References (143)

1. Frankel OH: Genetic conservation: our evolutionary responsibility. Genetics 1974, 78: 53-65.
2. Frankel OH, Soulé ME: Conservation and evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1981.
3. Crnokrak P, Roff DA: Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 1999, 83: 260-270. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6885530
4. Keller LF, Waller DM: Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 2002, 17: 230-241. 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02489-8
5. O'Grady JJ, Brook BW, Reed DH, Ballou JD, Tonkyn DW, Frankham R: Realistic levels of inbreeding depression strongly affect extinction risk in wild populations. Biol Conserv 2006, 133: 42-51. 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.05.016
6. Reed DH, Frankham R: Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol 2003, 17: 230-237. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01236.x
7. Hedrick PW, Fredrickson R: Genetic rescue guidelines with examples from Mexican wolves and Florida panthers. Conserv Genet 2010, 11: 615-626. 10.1007/s10592-009-9999-5
8. Tallmon DA, Luikart G, Waples RS: The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue. Trends Ecol Evol 2004, 19: 489-496. 10.1016/j.tree.2004.07.003
9. Westemeier RL, Brawn JD, Simpson SA, Esker TL, Jansen RW, Walk JW, Kershner EL, Bouzat JL, Paige KN: Tracking the long-term decline and recovery of an isolated population. Science 1998, 282: 1695-1698.
10. Hogg JT, Forbes SH, Steele BM, Luikart G: Genetic rescue of an insular population of large mammals. Proc R Soc Lond, Ser B: Biol Sci 2006, 273: 1491-1499. 10.1098/rspb.2006.3477
11. Madsen T, Shine R, Olsson M, Wittzell H: Restoration of an inbred adder population. Nature 1999, 402: 34-35. 10.1038/46941
12. Trinkel M, Ferguson N, Reid A, Reid C, Somers M, Turelli L, Graf J, Szykman M, Cooper D, Haverman P, et al.: Translocating lions into an inbred lion population in the Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park, South Africa. Anim Conserv 2008, 11: 138-143. 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00163.x
13. Vilà C, Sundqvist A, Flagstad Ø, Seddon J, Björnerfeldt S, Kojola I, Casulli A, Sand H, Wabakken P, Ellegren H: Rescue of a severely bottlenecked wolf (Canis lupus) population by a single immigrant. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2003, 270: 91-97. 10.1098/rspb.2002.2184
14. Gregory A, Burke T, Ferris R, Robson J, Smithers R, Whitlock R: The conservation of genetic diversity: science and policy needs in a changing world. Peterborough, UK; 2006.
15. Edmands S: Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management. Mol Ecol 2007, 16: 463-475.
16. McClelland EK, Naish KA: What is the fitness outcome of crossing unrelated fish populations? A meta-analysis and an evaluation of future research directions. Conserv Genet 2007, 8: 397-416. 10.1007/s10592-006-9178-x
17. Lynch M: The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 1991, 45: 622-629. 10.2307/2409915
18. Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Spruell P, Wenburg JK: The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol Evol 2001, 16: 613-622. 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02290-X
19. Rieseberg LH: Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 2001, 16: 351-358. 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02187-5
20. White MJD: Modes of speciation. San Francisco, California: W. H. Freeman; 1978.
21. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Eldridge MDB, Lacy RC, Ralls K, Dudash MR, Fenster CB: Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression. Conserv Biol 2011, 25: 465-475. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01662.x
22. Arnold ML, Hodges SA: Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Trends Ecol Evol 1995, 10: 67-71. 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)88979-X
23. Coyne JA, Orr HA: Speciation. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates; 2004.
24. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC: Quantitative Genetics. Harlow, England: Prentice Hall; 1996.
25. Orr HA: The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 1995, 139: 1805-1813.
26. Edmands S, Timmerman CC: Modeling factors affecting the severity of outbreeding depression. Conserv Biol 2003, 17: 883-892. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02026.x
27. Edmands S: Does parental divergence predict reproductive compatibility. Trends Ecol Evol 2002, 17: 520-527. 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02585-5
28. Storfer A: Gene flow and endangered species translocations: a topic revisited. Biol Conserv 1999, 87: 173-180. 10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00066-4
29. Whitlock R, Stewart GB, Pullin AS, Goodman SJ, Piertney SB, Butlin RK, Burke T, Brodie J, Hipperson H: Does translocation of individuals between populations result in net cost to fitness in offspring of mixed populations?. Bangor, UK: Collaboration for Environmental Evidence; 2009.
30. Hedrick PW: Evaluation of D2, a microsatellite measure of inbreeding and outbreeding, in wolves with a known pedigree. Evolution 2001, 55: 1256-1260.
31. Cohen J: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960, 20: 37-46. 10.1177/001316446002000104
32. Pullin AS, Stewart GB: Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conserv Biol 2006, 20: 1647-1656. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00485.x
33. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR: Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
34. Hadfield JD: MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J Stat Softw 2010, 33: 1-22.
35. Hadfield JD, Nakagawa S: General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology: phylogenies, taxonomies and multi-trait models for continuous and categorical characters. J Evol Biol 2010, 23: 494-508. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01915.x
36. Gelman A: Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models. Bayesian Analysis 2006, 1: 515-533.
37. Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, van der Linde A: Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc Lond B 2002, 64: 583-639. 10.1111/1467-9868.00353
38. Sutton JT, Nakagawa S, Robertson BC, Jamieson IG: Disentangling the roles of natural selection and genetic drift in shaping variation at MHC immunity genes. Mol Ecol 2011, 20: 4408-4420. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05292.x
39. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG: Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002, 21: 1539-1558. 10.1002/sim.1186
40. Viechtbauer W: Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J Stat Softw 2010, 36: 1-48.
41. Egger M, Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C: Bias in metaanalysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br Med J 1997, 315: 629-634. 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
42. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB: Bayesian Data Analysis. London, New York, Washington, D. C.: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2004.
43. Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33: 159-174. 10.2307/2529310
44. Sherman CDH, Wapstra E, Uller T, Olsson M: Male and female effects on fertilization success and offspring viability in the Peron's tree frog, Litoria peronii. Austral Ecol 2008, 33: 348-352. 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01823.x
45. Sagvik J, Uller T, Olsson M: Outbreeding depression in the common frog, Rana temporaria. Conserv Genet 2005, 6: 205-211. 10.1007/s10592-004-7829-3
46. Byrom AE, Burns CW, Wallis GP: Experimental hybridization of alpine and lowland forms of Boeckella dilata, a calanoid copepod. Heredity 1993, 71: 508-515. 10.1038/hdy.1993.169
47. Edmands S, Feaman HV, Harrison JS, Timmerman CC: Genetic consequences of many generations of hybridization between divergent copepod populations. J Hered 2005, 96: 114-123. 10.1093/jhered/esi014
48. Edmands S, Deimler JK: Local adaptation, intrinsic coadaptation and the effects of environmental stress on interpopulation hybrids in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 2004, 303: 183-196. 10.1016/j.jembe.2003.11.012
49. Edmands S: Heterosis and outbreeding depression in interpopulation crosses spanning a wide range of divergence. Evolution 1999, 53: 1757-1768. 10.2307/2640438
50. Ellison CK, Burton RS: Interpopulation hybrid breakdown maps to the mitochondrial genome. Evolution 2008, 62: 631-638. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00305.x
51. Leberg PL: Strategies for population reintroduction - effects of genetic-variability on population growth and size. Conserv Biol 1993, 7: 194-199. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07010194.x
52. Nguenga D, Teugels GG, Ollevier F: Fertilization, hatching, survival and growth rates in reciprocal crosses of two strains of an African catfish Heterobranchus longifilis Valenciennes 1840 under controlled hatchery conditions. Aquacult Res 2000, 31: 565-573. 10.1046/j.1365-2109.2000.00468.x
53. Gjerde B, Reddy P, Mahapatra KD, Saha JN, Jana RK, Meher PK, Sahoo M, Lenka S, Govindassamy P, Rye M: Growth and survival in two complete diallele crosses with five stocks of Rohu carp (Labeo rohita). Aquaculture 2002, 209: 103-115. 10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00848-1
54. Cooke SJ, Philipp DP: Influence of local adaptation and interstock hybridization on the cardiovascular performance of largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides. J Exp Biol 2005, 208: 2055-2062. 10.1242/jeb.01602
55. Cooke SJ, Kassler TW, Phillipp DP: Physiological performance of largemouth bass related to local adaptation and interstock hybridization: implications for conservation and management. J Fish Biol 2001, 59: 248-268. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2001.tb01389.x
56. Goldberg TL, Grant EC, Inendino KR, Kassler TW, Claussen JE, Philipp DP: Increased infectious disease susceptibility resulting from outbreeding depression. Conserv Biol 2005, 19: 455-462. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00091.x
57. Gharrett AJ, Smoker WW, Reisenbichler RR, Taylor SG: Outbreeding depression in hybrids between odd- and even-broodyear pink salmon. Aquaculture 1999, 173: 117-129. 10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00480-3
58. Gharrett AJ, Smoker WW: Two generations of hybrids between even-year and odd-year pink salmon Oncorhynchus gorbuscha a test for outbreeding depression. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 1991, 48: 1744-1749. 10.1139/f91-206
59. Gilk SE, Wang IA, Hoover CL, Smoker WW, Taylor SG, Gray AK, Gharrett AJ: Outbreeding depression in hybrids between spatially separated pink salmon, Oncorhynchus gorbuscha, populations: marine survival, homing ability, and variability in family size. Environ Biol Fishes 2004, 69: 287-297.
60. Johnsson JI, Clarke WC, Withler RE: Hybridization with domesticated rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) reduces seasonal variation in growth of steelhead trout (O. mykiss). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 1993, 50: 480-487. 10.1139/f93-056
61. Miller LM, Close T, Kapuscinski AR: Lower fitness of hatchery and hybrid rainbow trout compared to naturalized populations in Lake Superior tributaries. Mol Ecol 2004, 13: 3379-3388. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02347.x
62. Tymchuk WE, Sundström LF, Devlin RH: Growth and survival trade-offs and outbreeding depression in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Evolution 2007, 61: 1225-1237. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00102.x
63. Bryden CA, Heath JW, Heath DD: Performance and heterosis in farmed and wild Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawyacha) hybrid and purebred crosses. Aquaculture 2004, 235: 249-261. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.01.027
64. Sheffer RJ, Hedrick PW, Velasco AL: Testing for inbreeding and outbreeding depression in the endangered Gila topminnow. Anim Conserv 1999, 2: 121-129. 10.1111/j.1469-1795.1999.tb00057.x
65. Fraser DJ, Houde ALS, Debes PV, O'Reilly P, Eddington JD, Hutchings JA: Consequences of farmed-wild hybridization across divergent wild populations and multiple traits in salmon. Ecol Appl 2010, 20: 935-953. 10.1890/09-0694.1
66. Fraser DJ, Cook AM, Eddington JD, Bentzen P, Hutchings JA: Mixed evidence for reduced local adaptation in wild salmon resulting from interbreeding with escaped farmed salmon: complexities in hybrid fitness. Evolutionary Applications 2008, 1: 501-512. 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00037.x
67. Houde ALS, Fraser DJ, Hutchings JA: Reduced anti-predator responses in multi-generational hybrids of farmed and wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Conserv Genet 2010, 11: 785-794. 10.1007/s10592-009-9892-2
68. McGinnity P, Prodohl P, Ferguson A, Hynes R, Maoileidigh NO, Baker N, Cotter D, O'Hea B, Cooke D, Rogan G, et al.: Fitness reduction and potential extinction of wild populations of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, as a result of interactions with escaped farm salmon. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 2003, 270: 2443-2450. 10.1098/rspb.2003.2520
69. Dahl J, Pettersson E, Dannewitz J, Järvi T, Löf AC: No difference in survival, growth and morphology between offspring of wild-born, hatchery and hybrid brown trout (Salmo trutta). Ecol Freshwat Fish 2006, 15: 388-397. 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2006.00150.x
70. Nilsson J: Arctic charr strain crosses - effects on growth and sexual maturity. J Fish Biol 1993, 43: 163-171. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1993.tb00420.x
71. Escobar JS, Nicot A, David P: The different sources of variation in inbreeding depression, heterosis and outbreeding depression in a metapopulation of Physa acuta. Genetics 2008, 180: 1593-1608. 10.1534/genetics.108.092718
72. McCarthy TM, Sih A: Relatedness of mates influences mating behaviour and reproductive success of the hermaphroditic freshwater snail Physa gyrina. Evol Ecol Res 2008, 10: 77-94.
73. Reinhardt K, Kohler G: Conservation of the red-winged grasshopper, Oedipoda germanica (Latr.): the influence of reproductive behaviour. Biol Conserv 2002, 107: 221-228. 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00096-4
74. Hogg JT, Forbes SH, Steele BM, Luikart G: Genetic rescue of an insular population of large mammals. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 2006, 273: 1491-1499. 10.1098/rspb.2006.3477
75. Keane B: Dispersal and inbreeding avoidance in the white-footed mouse Peromyscus leucopus. Anim Behav 1990, 40: 143-152. 10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80674-8
76. Cruz P, Ramirez JL, Garcia GA, Ibarra AM: Genetic differences between two populations of catarina scallop (Argopecten ventricosus) for adaptations for growth and survival in a stressful environment. Aquaculture 1998, 166: 321-335. 10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00285-3
77. Cruz P, Ibarra AM: Larval growth and survival of two catarina scallop (Argopecten circularis, Sowerby, 1835) populations and their reciprocal crosses. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 1997, 212: 95-110. 10.1016/S0022-0981(96)02742-6
78. Dolgin ES, Felix MA, Cutter AD: Hakuna Nematoda: genetic and phenotypic diversity in African isolates of Caenorhabditis elegans and C. briggsae. Heredity 2008, 100: 304-315. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6801079
79. Keller M, Kollmann J, Edwards PJ: Genetic introgression from distant provenances reduces fitness in local weed populations. J Appl Ecol 2000, 37: 647-659. 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00517.x
80. Andalo C, Cruzan MB, Cazettes C, Pujol B, Burrus M, Thébaud C: Post-pollination barriers do not explain the persistence of two distinct Antirrhinum subspecies with parapatric distribution. Plant Syst Evol 2010, 286: 223-234. 10.1007/s00606-010-0303-4
81. Luijten SH, Kery M, Oostermeijer JGB, Den Nijs HJCM: Demographic consequences of inbreeding and outbreeding in Arnica montana: a field experiment. J Ecol 2002, 90: 593-603. 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00703.x
82. Raabová J, Münzbergová Z, Fischer M: Consequences of near and far between-population crosses for offspring fitness in a rare herb. Plant Biol 2009, 11: 829-836. 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00186.x
83. Johansen-Morris AD, Latta RG: Fitness consequences of hybridization between ecotypes of Avena barbata: hybrid breakdown, hybrid vigor, and transgressive segregation. Evolution 2006, 60: 1585-1595.
84. Rao GY, Andersson S, Widen B: Developmental stability in Brassica cretica: the effect of crossing distance on fluctuating asymmetry in cotyledon morphology. Heredity 2002, 88: 197-202. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800027
85. Heiser DA, Shaw RG: The fitness effects of outcrossing in Calylophus serrulatus, a permanent translocation heterozygote. Evolution 2006, 60: 64-76.
86. Etterson JR, Keller SR, Galloway LF: Epistatic and cytonuclear interactions govern outbreeding depression in the autotetraploid Campanulastrum americanum. Evolution 2007, 61: 2671-2683. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00234.x
87. Galloway LF, Etterson JR: Population differentiation and hybrid success in Campanula americana: geography and genome size. J Evol Biol 2005, 18: 81-89. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00801.x
88. Kaye TN, Lawrence B: Fitness effects of inbreeding and outbreeding on golden paintbrush (Castilleja levisecta): implications for recovery and reintroduction. Corvallis, Oregon: Institute for Applied Ecology; 2003.
89. Erickson DL, Fenster CB: Intraspecific hybridization and the recovery of fitness in the native legume Chamaecrista fasciculata. Evolution 2006, 60: 225-233.
90. Holtsford TP: Variation in inbreeding depression among families and populations of Clarkia tembloriensis (Onagraceae). Heredity 1996, 76: 83-91. 10.1038/hdy.1996.11
91. Paschke M, Abs C, Schmid B: Effects of population size and pollen diversity on reproductive success and offspring size in the narrow endemic Cochlearia bavarica (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 2002, 89: 1250-1259. 10.3732/ajb.89.8.1250
92. Pelabon C, Carlson ML, Hansen TF, Armbruster WS: Effects of crossing distance on offspring fitness and developmental stability in Dalechampia scandens (Euphorbiaceae). Am J Bot 2005, 92: 842-851. 10.3732/ajb.92.5.842
93. Waser NM, Price MV: Crossing-distance effects in Delphinium nelsonii: outbreeding and inbreeding depression in progeny fitness. Evolution 1994, 48: 842-852. 10.2307/2410491
94. Grindeland JM: Inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression in Digitalis purpurea: optimal outcrossing distance in a tetraploid. J Evol Biol 2008, 21: 716-726. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01519.x
95. Wagenius S, Hangelbroek HH, Ridley CE, Shaw RG: Biparental inbreeding and interremnant mating in a perennial prairie plant: fitness consequences for progeny in their first eight years. Evolution 2010, 64: 761-771. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00860.x
96. Sobrevila C: Effects of distance between pollen donor and pollen recipient on fitness components in Espeletia schultzii. Am J Bot 1988, 75: 701-724. 10.2307/2444203
97. Hardner CM, Potts BM, Gore PL: The relationship between cross success and spatial proximity of Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus parents. Evolution 1998, 52: 614-618. 10.2307/2411096
98. Byers DL: Effect of cross proximity on progeny fitness in a rare and a common species of Eupatorium (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 1998, 85: 644-653. 10.2307/2446533
99. Oostermeijer JGB, Altenburg RGM, Den Nijs HCM: Effects of outcrossing distance and selfing on fitness components in the rare Gentiana pneumonanthe (Gentianaceae). Acta Bot Neerl 1995, 44: 257-268.
100. Fischer M, Matthies D: Mating structure and inbreeding and outbreeding depression in the rare plant Gentianella germanica (Gentianaceae). Am J Bot 1997, 84: 1685-1692. 10.2307/2446466
101. Paland S, Schmid B: Population size and the nature of genetic load in Gentianella germanica. Evolution 2003, 57: 2242-2251.
102. Vandepitte K, Honnay O, Jacquemyn H, Roldán-Ruiz I: Effects of outcrossing in fragmented populations of the primarily selfing forest herb Geum urbanum. Evol Ecol 2010, 24: 1353-1364. 10.1007/s10682-010-9395-0
103. Ellis JR, McCauley DE: Phenotypic differentiation in fitness related traits between populations of an extremely rare sunflower: conservation management of isolated populations. Biol Conserv 2009, 142: 1836-1843. 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.03.029
104. Becker U, Reinhold T, Matthies D: Effects of pollination distance on reproduction and offspring performance in Hypochoeris radicata: experiments with plants from three European regions. Biol Conserv 2006, 132: 109-118. 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.03.018
105. Waser NM, Price MV: Optimal outcrossing in Ipomopsis aggregata seed set and offspring fitness. Evolution 1989, 43: 1097-1109. 10.2307/2409589
106. Schlichting CD, Devlin B: Pollen and ovule sources affect seed production of Lobelia cardinalis (Lobeliaceae). Am J Bot 1992, 79: 891-898. 10.2307/2444999
107. Mutikainen P, Delph LF: Inbreeding depression in gynodioecious Lobelia siphilitica: among-family differences override between-morph differences. Evolution 1998, 52: 1572-1582. 10.2307/2411331
108. Montalvo AM, Ellstrand NC: Nonlocal transplantation and outbreeding depression in the subshrub Lotus scoparius (Fabaceae). Am J Bot 2001, 88: 258-269. 10.2307/2657017
109. Hauser TP, Loeschcke V: Inbreeding depression and mating-distance dependent offspring fitness in large and small populations of Lychnis flos-cuculi (Caryophyllaceae). J Evol Biol 1994, 7: 609-622. 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1994.7050609.x
110. Leimu R, Fischer M: Between-population outbreeding affects plant defence. PLoS One 2010., 5
111. Pisanu PC, Gross CL, Flood L: Reproduction in wild populations of the threatened tree Macadamia tetraphylla: interpopulation pollen enriches fecundity in a declining species. Biotropica 2009, 41: 391-398. 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00484.x
112. Vandepitte K, Roldán-Ruiz I, Honnay O: Reproductive consequences of mate quantity versus mate diversity in a wind-pollinated plant. Acta Oecol 2009, 35: 548-553. 10.1016/j.actao.2009.04.004
113. Mooney EH, McGraw JB: Effects of self-pollination and outcrossing with cultivated plants in small natural populations of American ginseng, Panax quinquefolius (Araliaceae). Am J Bot 2007, 94: 1677-1687. 10.3732/ajb.94.10.1677
114. Levin DA, Bulinska-Radomska Z: Effects of hybridization and inbreeding on fitness in Phlox. Am J Bot 1988, 75: 1632-1639. 10.2307/2444679
115. Bolstad SB, Kang H, Guries RP, Marty TL: Performance of interprovenance and intraprovenance crosses of jack pine in central Wisconsin. Silvae Genet 1991, 40: 124-130.
116. Harfouche A, Kremer A: Provenance hybridization in a diallel mating scheme of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster). I. Means and variance components. Can J For Res-Rev Can Rech For 2000, 30: 1-9.
117. Rhode JM, Cruzan MB: Contributions of heterosis and epistasis to hybrid fitness. Am Nat 2005, 166: E124-E139. 10.1086/491798
118. Crémieux L, Bischoff A, Müller-Schärer H, Steinger T: Gene flow from foreign provenances into local plant populations: fitness consequences and implications for biodiversity restoration. Am J Bot 2010, 97: 94-100. 10.3732/ajb.0900103
119. Willi Y, Van Kleunen M, Dietrich S, Fischer M: Genetic rescue persists beyond first-generation outbreeding in small populations of a rare plant. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 2007, 274: 2357-2364. 10.1098/rspb.2007.0768
120. Willi Y, Fischer M: Genetic rescue in interconnected populations of small and large size of the self-incompatible Ranunculus reptans. Heredity 2005, 95: 437-443. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800732
121. Dudash MR: Relative fitness of selfed and outcrossed progeny in a self-compatible protandrous species Sabatia-angularis L. Gentianaceae a comparison in three environments. Evolution 1990, 44: 1129-1139. 10.2307/2409277
122. Sheridan PM, Karowe DN: Inbreeding, outbreeding, and heterosis in the yellow pitcher plant, Sarracenia flava (Sarraceniaceae), in Virginia. Am J Bot 2000, 87: 1628-1633. 10.2307/2656739
123. Colling G, Reckinger C, Matthies D: Effects of pollen quantity and quality on reproduction and offspring vigor in the rare plant Scorzonera humilis (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 2004, 91: 1774-1782. 10.3732/ajb.91.11.1774
124. Caño L, Escarré J, Blanco-Moreno JM, Sans FX: Assessing the effect of inbreeding and long-distance gene flow on the invasive potential of Senecio pterophorus (Asteraceae). Aust J Bot 2008, 56: 539-549. 10.1071/BT07100
125. Stacy EA: Cross-fertility in two tropical tree species: evidence of inbreeding depression within populations and genetic divergence among populations. Am J Bot 2001, 88: 1041-1051. 10.2307/2657086
126. Hathaway L, Andersson S, Prentice HC: Experimental crosses within European Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae): intraspecific differentiation, distance effects, and sex ratio. Botany 2009, 87: 231-240. 10.1139/B08-137
127. Wolfe LM, Blair AC, Penna BM: Does intraspecific hybridization contribute to the evolution of invasiveness?: an experimental test. Biol Invasions 2007, 9: 515-521. 10.1007/s10530-006-9046-0
128. Bailey MF, McCauley DE: The effects of inbreeding, outbreeding and long-distance gene flow on survivorship in North American populations of Silene vulgaris. J Ecol 2006, 94: 98-109. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01090.x
129. Emery SN, McCauley DE: Consequences of inbreeding for offspring fitness and gender in Silene vulgaris, a gynodioecious plant. J Evol Biol 2002, 15: 1057-1066. 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00461.x
130. Thompson JD, Tarayre M, Gauthier P, Litrico I, Linhart YB: Multiple genetic contributions to plant performance in Thymus vulgaris. J Ecol 2004, 92: 45-56. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2004.00851.x
131. Eckstein RL, Otte A: Effects of cleistogamy and pollen source on seed production and offspring performance in three endangered violets. Basic Appl Ecol 2005, 6: 339-350. 10.1016/j.baae.2004.12.002
132. Billingham MR, Simoes T, Reusch TBH, Serrao EA: Genetic sub-structure and intermediate optimal outcrossing distance in the marine angiosperm Zostera marina. Mar Biol 2007, 152: 793-801. 10.1007/s00227-007-0730-0
133. Arrayago M, Bea A, Heulin B: Hybridization experiment between oviparous and viviparous strains of Lacerta vivipara: A new insight into the evolution of viviparity in reptiles. Herpetologica 1996, 52: 333-342.
134. Grosberg RK: Limited dispersal and proximity-dependent mating success in the colonial Ascidian Botryllus-schlosseri. Evolution 1987, 41: 372-384. 10.2307/2409145
135. DeRose MA, Roff DA: A comparison of inbreeding depression in life-history and morphological traits in animals. Evolution 1999, 53: 1288-1292. 10.2307/2640831
136. Merilä J, Sheldon BC: Genetic architecture of fitness and non-fitness traits: empirical patterns and development of ideas. Heredity 1999, 83: 103-109. 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1999.00585.x
137. Roberts RC: The effects on litter size of crossing lines of mice inbred without selection. Genet Res 1960, 1: 239-252. 10.1017/S0016672300000227
138. Terrin N, Schmid CH, Lau J: In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol 2005, 58: 894-901. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.006
139. Orwin RG: A fail-safe n for effect size in meta-analysis. J Educ Stat 1983, 8: 157-159.
140. Falk DA, Millar CI, Olwell M: Restoring diversity: strategies for reintroduction of endangered plants. Washington, USA: Island Press; 1996.
141. Seddon PJ: From reintroduction to assisted colonization: moving along the conservation translocation spectrum. Restor Ecol 2010, 18: 796-802. 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00724.x
142. Allen WH: Reintroduction of endangered plants. Bioscience 1994, 44: 65-68. 10.2307/1312203
143. McLachlan JS, Hellmann JJ, Schwartz MW: A framework for debate of assisted migration in an era of climate change. Conserv Biol 2007, 21: 297-302. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00676.x