The relationship between cross success and spatial proximity of Eucalyptus globulus ssp. Globulus parents

Evolution

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 614-618

  Hardner, Craig M ^a,b   Potts, Bradley M ^a   Gore, Peter L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Gene flow; Genetic neighborhood; Inbreeding depression; Outbreeding depression; Population structure

Indexed keywords

GENETIC STRUCTURE; INBREEDING; RELATEDNESS; SPATIAL GENETIC STRUCTURE;

DICOTYLEDONEAE; EUCALYPTUS; EUCALYPTUS GLOBULUS; EUCALYPTUS GLOBULUS GLOBULUS; EUCALYPTUS GLOBULUS SUBSP. GLOBULUS;

EID: 0031925123     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb01660.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. BEAULIEU, J., AND J. P. SIMON. 1995. Mating system in natural populations of eastern white pine in Quebec. Can. J. For. Res. 25:1697-1703.
2. BERG, E. E., AND J. L. HAMRICK. 1995. Fine-scale genetic structure of a turkey oak forest. Evolution 49:110-120.
3. BRLINEL, D., AND F. RODOLPHE. 1985. Genetic neighbourhood structure in a population of Picea abies L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 71: 101-110.
4. COLES, J. F., AND D. P. FOWLER. 1976. Inbreeding in neighboring trees in two white spruce populations. Silvae Genet. 25:29-34.
5. ELDRIDGE, K. G., J. DAVIDSON, C. E. HARWOOD, AND G. VAN WYK. 1993. Eucalypt domestication and breeding. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, U.K.
6. ELLSTRAND, N. C. 1992. Gene flow among seed plant populations. New For. 6:241-256.
7. ENDLER, J. A. 1977. Geographic variation, speciation, and clines. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
8. EPPERSON, B. K. 1992. Spatial structure of genetic variation within populations of forest trees. New For. 6:257-278.
9. EPPERSON, B. K., AND R. W. ALLARD. 1989. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of the distribution of genotypes within populations of lodgepole pine. Genetics 121:369-377.
10. FENSTER, C. B. 1991a. Gene flow in Chamuecrista fasciculata (Leguminosae) I. Gene dispersal. Evolution 45:398-409.
11. _. 1991b. Effect of male pollen donor and female seed parent on allocation of resources to developing seeds and fruit in Chamaecrista fasciculata (Leguminosae). Am. J. Bot. 78:13-23.
12. _. 1991c. Gene flow in Chamaecrista fasciculata (Leguminosae) II. Gene establishment. Evolution 45:410-422.
13. 1 hybrid. Pp. 241-242 in B. M., Potts, N. M. G. Borralho, J. B. Reid, R. N. Cromer, W. N. Tibbits, and C. A. Raymond, eds. Eucalypt plantations: improving fibre yield and quality. CRC-IUFRO Conference, February 19-24, CRC for Temperate Hardwood Forestry, Hobart, Australia.
14. GRIFFIN, A. R. 1980. Floral phenology of a stand of mountain ash (Eucalyptus regnans F. Muell.) in Gippsland, Victoria. Aust. J. Bot. 28:393-404.
15. _. 1989. Effects of inbreeding on growth of forest trees and implication for management of seed supplies for plantation programmes. Pp. 355-372 in K. S. Bawa and M. Hadley, eds. Re- productive ecology of tropical forest plants. UNESCO and the Parthenon Publishing Group, Paris.
16. HARDNER, C. M., AND B. M. POTTS. 1995. Inbreeding depression and changes in variation after selfing in Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus. Silvae Genet. 44:46-54.
17. _. 1997. Postdispersal selection following mixed mating in Eucalyptus regnans. Evolution 51:103-111.
18. HARDNER, C. M., R. E. VAILLANCOURT, AND B. M. POTTS. 1996. Stand density influences outcrossing rate and growth of openpollinated families of Eucalyptus globulus. Silvae Genet. 45: 226-228.
19. HAUSER, T. P., AND V. LOESCHCKE. 1994. Inbreeding depression and mating-distance dependent offspring fitness in large and small populations of Lychnis flos-cuculi (Caryophyllaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 7:609-622.
20. HOPPER, S. D., AND G. F. MORAN. 1981. Bird pollination and the mating system of Eucalyptus stoatei, Aust. J. Bot. 29:625-638.
21. LEONARDI, S., S. RADDI, AND M. BORGHETTI. 1996. Spatial autocorrelation of allozyme traits in a norway spruce (Picea abies) population. Can. J. For. Res. 26:63-71.
22. LEVIN, D. A., AND H. W. KERSTER. 1974. Gene flow in plants. Evol. Biol. 7:139-220.
23. LINHART, Y. B., J. B. MITTON, K. B. STURGEON, AND M. L. DAVIS. 1981. Genetic variation in space and time in a population of ponderosa pine. Heredity 46:407-436.
24. LOVELESS, M. D., AND J. L. HAMRICK. 1984. Ecological determinates of genetic structure in plant populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15:65-95.
25. LYNCH, M. 1991. The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 43:622-629.
26. MC-CALL, C. T., T. MITCHELL-OLDS, AND D. M. WALLER. 1989. Distance between mates affects seedling characters in a population of Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae). Am. J. Bot. 78: 964-970.
27. MORAN, G. F., J. C. BELL, AND A. R. GRIFFIN. 1989. Reduction in levels of inbreeding in a seed orchard of Eucalyptus regnans F. Muell. compared with natural populations. Silvae Genet. 38:32-36.
28. NEWPORT, M. A. 1989. A test for proximity dependent outcrossing in the alpine skypilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 43: 1110-1113.
29. PARK, Y. S., AND D. P. FOWLER. 1982. Effects of inbreeding and genetic variances in a natural population of tamarack (Larix laricina (Du Roi) K. Koch) in eastern Canada. Silvae Genet. 31: 21-26.
30. _. 1984. Inbreeding in black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.): Self fertility, genetic load, and performance. Can. J. For. Res. 14:17-21.
31. PERRY, D. J., AND P. KNOWLES. 1991. Spatial genetic structure within three sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) stands. Heredity 66:137-142.
32. POTTS, B. M., AND R. J. E. WILTSHIRE. 1997. Eucalypt genetics and genecology. Pp. 56-91 in J. Williams and J. Woinarski, eds. Eucalypt ecology: individuals to ecosystems. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
33. POTTS, B. M., W. C. POTTS, AND B. CAUVIN. 1987. Inbreeding and interspecific hybridisation in Eucalyptus gunnii. Silvae Genet 36:194-199.
34. PRICE, M. V., AND N.M. WASER. 1979. Pollen dispersal and optimal crossing in Delphinium nelsonii. Nature 277:294-297.
35. PRYOR, L. D. 1976. The biology of eucalypts. Edward Arnold, London.
36. RITLAND, K. 1984. The effective proportion of self-fertilization with consanguineous matings in inbred populations. Genetics 106:139-152.
37. SAS INSTITUTE. 1992. SAS technical report P-229. SAS/STAT software: changes and enhancements. Rel. 6.07. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
38. SAVVA, M., B. M. POTTS, AND J. B. REID. 1988. The breeding system and gene flow in Eucalyptus urnigera. Pp. 176-182 in R. B. Knox, M. B. Sing, and L. F. Troiani, eds. Pollination '88. Plant Cell Biology Research Centre, Univ. of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
39. SORK, V. L., S. HUANG, AND E. WIENER. 1993. Macrogeographic and fine-scale genetic structure in a North American oak species, Quercus rubra L. Ann. Sci. For. 50:261s-270s.
40. TEMPLETON, A. R. 1986. Coadaptation and outbreeding depression. Pp. 105-116 in M. E. Soulé, ed. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
41. TIGERSTEDT, P. M. A. 1973. Studies on isozyme variation in marginal and central populations of Picea abies. Hereditas 75:51-60.
42. TURNER, M. E., J. C. STEPHENS, AND W. W. ANDERSON. 1982. Homozygosity and patch structure in plant populations as a result of nearest neighbor pollination. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 79: 203-207.
43. UYENOYAMA, M. K. 1986. Inbreeding and the cost of meiosis: the evolution of selfing in populations practicing biparental inbreeding. Evolution 40:388-404.
44. WASER, N. M., AND M. V. PRICE. 1989. Optimal outcrossing in Ipomopsis aggregata: seed set and offspring fitness. Evolution 43:1097-1109.
45. _. 1994. Crossing-distance effects in Delphinium netsoniioutbreeding and inbreeding depression in progeny fitness. Evolution 48:842-852.
46. WRIGHT, S. 1943. Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114-138.
47. _. 1978. Evolution and the genetics of populations. Vol 4. Variability within and among natural populations. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.