Species limits in Diaporthe: Molecular re-assessment of D. citri, D. cytosporella, D. foeniculina and D. rudis

Persoonia: Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi

Volumn 32, Issue , 2014, Pages 83-101

  Udayanga, D ^a,b   Castlebury, L A ^a   Rossman, A Y ^a   Hyde, K D ^b  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b MAE FAH LUANG UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Epitypification; Genealogical sorting index; Melanose; Multi gene phylogeny; New primers; Phomopsis; Species recognition; Stem end rot; Systematics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902962863     PISSN: 00315850     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3767/003158514X679984     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Agostini JP, Bushong PM, Bhatia A, Timmer LW. 2003. Effects of environmental factors on the severity of citrus scab and melanose. Plant Disease 87: 69-74.
2. Arx JA von, Müller E. 1954. Die Gattungen der amerosporen Pyrenomyceten. Beiträge zur Kryptogamenflora der Schweiz 11, 1: 1-434.
3. Bach WJ, Wolf FA. 1928. The isolation of the fungus that causes citrus melanose and the pathological anatomy of the host. Journal of Agricultural Research 37: 243-252.
4. Brayford D. 1990. Variation in Phomopsis isolates from Ulmus species in the British Isles and Italy. Mycological Research 94: 691-697.
5. Burger OF. 1923. Citrus stem-end rot. Citrus Industry 4: 14.
6. Burnett HC. 1962. Melanose: Diaporthe citri (Fawc) Wolf. Plant pathology circular No 2. Florida Department of Agriculture, Division of Plant Industry.
7. Cai L, Giraud T, Zhang N, Begerow D, Cai GH, Shivas RG. 2011. The evolution of species concepts and species recognition criteria in plant pathogenic fungi. Fungal Diversity 50: 121-133.
8. Carbone I, Kohn L. 1999. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 91: 553-556.
9. Castlebury LA. 2005. The Diaporthe vaccinii complex of fruit pathogens. Inoculum 56: 12.
10. Castlebury LA, Farr DF, Rossman AY, Jaklitsch WJ. 2003. Diaporthe angelicae comb. nov., a modern description and placement of Diaporthopsis in Diaporthe. Mycoscience 44: 203-208.
11. Crous PW. 2005. Impact of molecular phylogenetics on the taxonomy and diagnostics of fungi. EPPO Bulletin 35: 47-51.
12. Crous PW, Gams W, Stalpers JA, Robert V, Stegehuis G. 2004. MycoBank: an online initiative to launch mycology into the 21st century. Studies in Mycology 50: 19-22.
13. Cummings MP, Neel MC, Shaw KL. 2008. A genealogical approach to quantifying lineage divergence. Evolution 62: 2411-2422.
14. Curzi, M. 1927. De novis Theae micromycetibus pathogenis. Atti dell'Istituto Botanico della Università e Laboratorio Crittogamico di Pavia 3: 59-72.
15. Dettman JR, Jacobson DJ, Turner E, Pringle A, Taylor JW. 2003. Reproductive isolation and phylogenetic divergence in Neurospora: comparing methods of species recognition in a model eukaryote. Evolution 57: 2721-2741.
16. Diogo ELF, Santos JM, Phillips AJL. 2010. Phylogeny, morphology and pathogenicity of Diaporthe and Phomopsis species on almond in Portugal. Fungal Diversity 44: 107-115.
17. Elfar K, Torres R, Diaz GA, Latorre BA. 2013. Characterization of Diaporthe australafricana and Diaporthe spp. associated with stem canker of blueberry in Chile. Plant Disease 97: 1042-1050.
18. Farr DF, Castlebury LA, Rossman AY. 2002a. Morphological and molecular characterization of Phomopsis vaccinii and additional isolates of Phomopsis from blueberry and cranberry in the eastern United States. Mycologia 94: 494-504.
19. Farr DF, Castlebury LA, Rossman AY, Putnam ML. 2002b. A new species of Phomopsis causing twig dieback of Vaccinium vitisidaea (lingonberry). Mycological Research 106: 745-752.
20. Fawcett HS. 1912. The cause of stem-end rot of Citrus fruits (Phomopsis citri n. sp.). Phytopathology 2: 109-113.
21. Fawcett HS. 1922. A Phomopsis of citrus in California (abstract). Phytopathology 12: 107.
22. Fawcett HS. 1932. Diaporthe citri (Fawc.) Wolf, the perfect stage of Phomopsis citri and P. californica. Phytopathology 22: 928.
23. Fawcett HS. 1936. Citrus diseases and their control. McGraw Hill, New York, USA.
24. Fisher FE. 1972. Diaporthe citri and Phomopsis citri: A correction. Mycologia. 64: 422.
25. Floyd BF, Stevens HE. 1912. Melanose and stem-end rot. Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 111: 1-16. Florida.
26. French AM. 1987. California plant disease host index. Part 1: Fruit and nuts. California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento.
27. Gazis R, Rehner S, Chaverri P. 2011. Species delimitation in fungal endophyte diversity studies and its implications in ecological and biogeographic inferences. Molecular Ecology 20: 3001-3013.
28. Glass NL, Donaldson GC. 1995. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61: 1323-1330.
29. Golzar H, Tan YP, Shivas RG, Wang C. 2012. First report of shoot blight of persimmon caused by Diaporthe neotheicola in Australia. Australasian Plant Disease Notes 7: 115-117.
30. Gomes RR, Glienke C, Videira SIR, Lombard L, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW. 2013. Diaporthe: a genus of endophytic, saprobic and plant pathogenic fungi. Persoonia 31: 1-41.
31. Horne WT. 1922. A Phomopsis in grape fruit from the isle of Pines W. I., with notes on Diplodia natalensis. Phytopathology 12: 414-418.
32. Huang F, Hou X, Dewdney MM, Fu Y, Chen G, Hyde KD, Li H. 2013. Diaporthe species occurring on citrus in China. Fungal Diversity 61: 237-250.
33. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
34. Hyde KD, Abd-Elsalam K, Cai L. 2010a. Morphology: still essential in a molecular world. Mycotaxon 114: 439-451.
35. Hyde KD, Chomnunti P, Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Damm U, et al. 2010b. A case for re-inventory of Australia's plant pathogens. Persoonia 25: 50-60.
36. Hyde KD, Zhang Y. 2008. Epitypification: should we epitypify? Journal of Zhejiang University-Science B 9: 842-846.
37. Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT Multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772-780.
38. Ko-Ko TW, McKenzie EHC, Bahkali AH, To-Anun C, Chukeatirote E, et al. 2011. The need for re-inventory of Thai phytopathogens. Chiang Mai Journal of Science 38: 1-13.
39. Kobayashi T. 1970. Taxonomic studies of Japanese Diaporthaceae with special reference to their life-histories. Bulletin of the Government Forest Experiment Station, Tokyo 226: 1-242.
40. Kobayashi T. 2007. Index of fungi inhabiting woody plants in Japan. Host, distribution and literature. Zenkoku-Noson-Kyoiku Kyokai Publishing Co., Ltd.
41. Kucharek T, Whiteside J, Brown E. 1983. Melanose and stem end rot of citrus. Plant pathology fact sheet. Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainsville.
42. Kuhara S. 1999. The application of the epidemiologic simulation model 'MELAN' to control citrus melanose caused by Diaporthe citri (Faw.) Wolf. Food and Fertilizer Technology Center Extension Bulletins, National Fruit Research Institute, Japan.
43. Latorre BA, Elfar K, Espinoza JG, Torres R, Díaz GA. 2012. First report of Diaporthe australafricana associated with stem canker on blueberry in Chile. Plant Disease 96: 768.
44. Li HL. 1970. The origin of cultivated plants in Southeast Asia. Economic Botany 24, 1: 3-19.
45. Luongo L, Santori A, Riccioni L, Belisario A. 2011. Phomopsis sp. associated with post-harvest fruit rot of kiwifruit in Italy. Journal of Plant Pathology 93: 205-209.
46. McNeill J, Barrie FR, Buck WR, Demoulin V, Greuter W, et al. 2012. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi and plants (Melbourne Code) adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011. Regnum Vegetabile 154. Koeltz Scientific Books, Germany.
47. Mejia LC, Rossman AY, Castlebury LA, White Jr JF. 2011. New species, phylogeny, host-associations, and geographic distribution of the genus Cryptosporella (Gnomoniaceae, Diaporthales). Mycologia 103: 379-399.
48. Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 Nov. 2010, New Orleans, Louisiana: 1-8.
49. Moherek EA. 1970. Disease control in Florida citrus with Difolatan fungicide. Proceedings of the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Florida State Horticultural Society 83: 59-65.
50. Mondal SN, Agostini JP, Zhang L, Timmer LW. 2004. Factors affecting pycnidium production of Diaporthe citri on detached citrus twigs. Plant Disease 88: 379-382.
51. Mondal SN, Vincent A, Reis RF, Timmer LW. 2007. Saprophytic colonization of citrus twigs by Diaporthe citri and factors affecting pycnidial production and conidial survival. Plant Disease 91: 387-392.
52. Murali TS, Suryanarayanan TS, Geeta R. 2006. Endophytic Phomopsis species: host range and implications for diversity estimates. Canadian Journal Microbiology 52: 673-680.
53. Nelson S. 2008. Citrus melanose. Online document of Cooparative extension service, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii at Manoa. Plant Disease 59: 1-5. http://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/oc/freepubs/pdf/PD-59.pdf
54. Niekerk JM van, Groenewald JZ, Farr DF, Fourie PH, Halleen F, Crous PW. 2005. Reassessment of Phomopsis species on grapevines. Australasian Plant Pathology 34: 27-39.
55. Nylander JAA. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
56. O'Donnell K, Nirenberg HI, Aoki T, Cigelnik E. 2000. A multigene phylogeny of the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex: Detection of additional phylogenetically distinct species. Mycoscience 41: 61-78.
57. Page RDM. 1996. TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 12: 357-358.
58. Pantidou ME. 1973. Fungus-host index for Greece. Benaki Phytopathology Institute, Kiphissia, Athens.
59. Phillips AJL. 2003. Morphological characterization of Diaporthe foeniculacea and its Phomopsis anamorph on Foeniculum vulgare. Sydowia 55: 274-285.
60. Punithalingam E, Holliday P. 1973. Diaporthe citri CMI descriptions of pathogenic fungi and bacteria, No. 396. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, Surrey, England.
61. Rambaut A, Drummond A. 2008. FigTree: Tree figure drawing tool, version 1.2. 2. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh.
62. Rayner RW. 1970. A mycological colour chart. Kew, Surrey, UK: CMI and British Mycological Society.
63. Rehm H. 1914. Ascomycetes Philippinenses VI. Leaflets of Philippine Botany 6: 2258-2281.
64. Rehner SA, Uecker FA. 1994. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer phylogeny and host diversity in the coelomycete Phomopsis. Canadian Journal of Botany 72: 166-167.
65. Rensburg JCJ van, Lamprecht SC, Groenewald JZ, Castlebury LA, Crous PW. 2006. Characterization of Phomopsis spp. associated with die-back of rooibos (Aspalathus linearis) in South Africa. Studies in Mycology 55: 65-74.
66. Rossman AY, Palm-Hernández ME. 2008. Systematics of plant pathogenic fungi: why it matters. Plant Disease 92: 1376-1386.
67. Rossman AY, Udayanga D, Castlebury LA, Hyde KD. 2013. Proposal to conserve the name Diaporthe citri (H.S. Fawc.) Wolf based on Phomopsis citri H.S. Fawc. against Phomopsis citri (Sacc.) Traverso & Spessa. Taxon 62: 627.
68. Sakalidis ML, Hardy GE, Burgess TI. 2011. Use of the Genealogical Sorting Index (GSI) to delineate species boundaries in the Neofusicoccum parvum-Neofusicoccum ribis species complex. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 60: 333-344.
69. Santos JM, Correia VG, Phillips AJL. 2010. Primers for mating-type diagnosis in Diaporthe and Phomopsis: their use in teleomorph induction in vitro and biological species definition. Fungal Biology 114: 255-270.
70. Santos JM, Phillips AJL. 2009. Resolving the complex of Diaporthe (Phomopsis) species occurring on Foeniculum vulgare in Portugal. Fungal Diversity 34: 111-125.
71. Santos JM, Vrandečić K, Ćosić J, Duvnjak T, Phillips AJL. 2011. Resolving the Diaporthe species occurring on soybean in Croatia. Persoonia 27: 9-19.
72. Schoch CL, Seifert KA, Huhndorf S, Robert V, Spouge JL, et al. 2012. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109: 6241-6246.
73. Shivas RG, Cai L. 2012. Cryptic fungal species unmasked. Microbiology Australia 33: 36-37.
74. Silva DN, Talhinhas P, Cai L, Manuel L, Gichuru EK, et al. 2012. Host-jump drives rapid and recent ecological speciation the emergent fungal pathogen Colletotrichum kahawae. Molecular Ecology 21: 2655-2670.
75. Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688-2690.
76. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Systematic Biology 57: 758-771.
77. Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP 4.0b10: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
78. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 2731-2739.
79. Taylor JW, Jacobson DJ, Kroken S, Kasuga T, Geiser DM, et al. 2000. Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. Fungal Genetics and Biology 31: 21-32.
80. Thomidis T, Exadaktylou E, Chen S. 2013. Diaporthe neotheicola, a new threat for kiwi fruit in Greece. Crop Protection 47: 35-40.
81. Timmer LW. 2000. Scab diseases. In: Whiteside JO, Garnsey SM, Timmer LW (eds), Compendium of citrus diseases, revised edition: 31-32. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota.
82. Timmer LW, Fucik JE. 1976. The relationship of rainfall distribution, fruit growth, and fungicide application to the incidence of melanose on grapefruit in Texas. Plant Disease Reporter 60: 565-568.
83. Timmer LW, Kucharek TA. 2001. Melanose (revised). Plant Pathology Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Fact Sheet PP-150.
84. Traverso GB, Spessa C. 1910. La flora micologica del Portugallo. Saggio. Boletim da Sociedade Broteriana 25: 26-187.
85. Udayanga D, Liu X, Crous PW, McKenzie EHC, Chukeatirote E, Hyde KD. 2012a. A multi-locus phylogenetic evaluation of Diaporthe (Phomopsis). Fungal Diversity 56: 157-171.
86. Udayanga D, Liu X, McKenzie EHC, Chukeatirote E, Bahkali AHA, Hyde KD. 2011. The genus Phomopsis: biology, applications, species concepts and names of common phytopathogens. Fungal Diversity 50: 189-225.
87. Udayanga D, Liu X, Mckenzie EHC, Chukeatirote E, Hyde KD. 2012b. Multilocus phylogeny reveals three new species of Diaporthe from Thailand. Cryptogamie Mycologie 33: 295-309.
88. Walker DM, Castlebury LA, Rossman AY, Mejía LC, White JF. 2012. Phylogeny and taxonomy of Ophiognomonia (Gnomoniaceae, Diaporthales), including twenty-five new species in this highly diverse genus. Fungal Diversity 57: 85-147.
89. Wehmeyer LE. 1933. The genus Diaporthe Nitschke and its segregates. University of Michigan Studies, Science Series 9: 1-349.
90. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990 Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds), PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications: 315-322. Academic Press, San Diego.
91. Whiteside JO. 1977. Sites of action of fungicides in the control of Citrus melanose. Phytopathology 67: 1067-1072.
92. Whiteside JO, Timmer LW. 2000a. Citrus diseases: general concepts. In: Whiteside JO, Garnsey SM, Timmer LW (eds), Compendium of citrus diseases, revised edition: 3-4. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota.
93. Whiteside JO, Timmer LW. 2000b. Melanose. In: Whiteside JO, Garnsey MS, Timmer LW (eds), Compendium of citrus diseases, revised edition: 20-21. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota.
94. Winston JR, Fluton HR, Bowman JJ. 1923. Commercial control of Citrus stem end rot. United States Department of Agriculture Circular 193: 1-10.
95. Wolf FA. 1926. The perfect stage of the fungus which causes melanose of citrus. Journal of Agricultural Research 33: 621-625.
96. Yamato H. 1976. A species of Diaporthe pathogenic to citrus. Annals of the Phytopathological Society Japan 42: 56-59.