Endophytic Phomopsis species: Host range and implications for diversity estimates

Canadian Journal of Microbiology

Volumn 52, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 673-680

  Murali, T S ^a   Suryanarayanan, T S ^b   Geeta, R ^c  

^a VIVEKANANDA COLLEGE   (India)

^b Vivekananda Institute of Tropical Mycology VINSTROM   (India)

^c STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fungal diversity; Fungal endophytes; Host restriction; Phomopsis; Tectona grandis

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL DIVERSITY; FUNGAL ENDOPHYTES; HOST RESTRICTIONS; PHOMOPSIS; TECTONA GRANDIS;

BIODIVERSITY; FUNGI; PATHOLOGY;

FORESTRY;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECIDUOUS FOREST; ENDOPHYTE; FUNGUS; HOST RANGE; SURVIVAL;

ARTICLE; ASCOMYCETES; DNA EXTRACTION; ENDOPHYTE; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS; HYPHOMYCETES; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHOMOPSIS; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECTONA GRANDIS; VERBENACEAE; ZYGOMYCETES;

ASCOMYCOTA; BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM; INDIA; LAMIACEAE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; PLANT LEAVES; TREES;

BIODIVERSITY; FORESTRY; FUNGI; PATHOLOGY;

ASIA; EURASIA; INDIA; NILGIRI BIOSPHERE RESERVE; SOUTH ASIA; TAMIL NADU;

CASSIA FISTULA; FUNGI; PHOMOPSIS; TECTONA GRANDIS;

EID: 33749528784     PISSN: 00084166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/W06-020     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anonymous. 1995. Teak (Tectona grandis). KFRI Information Bulletin 13, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Kerala, India.
2. Arnold, A.E. 2005. Diversity and ecology of fungal endophytes in tropical forests. In The bio-diversity of fungi: their role in human life. Edited by S.K. Deshmukh and M.K. Rai. Oxford & IBH Publishing, New Delhi, India, pp. 49-68.
3. Arnold, A.E., Maynard, Z., Gilbert, G.S., Coley, P.D., and Kursar, T.A. 2000. Are tropical fungal endophytes hyperdiverse? Ecol. Lett. 3: 267-274.
4. Bills, G.F., and Polishook, J.D. 1992. Recovery of endophytic fungi from Chamaecyparis thyoides. Sydowia, 44: 1-12.
5. Brayford, D. 1990. Variation in Phomopsis isolates from Ulmus species in the British Isles and Italy. Mycol. Res. 94: 691-697.
6. Chang, C.Q., Cheng, Y.H., Xiang, M.H., Jiang, Z.D., and Chi, P.K. 2005. New species of Phomopsis on woody plants in Fujian province. Mycosystema, 24: 6-11.
7. FAO. 2001. Global forest resources assessment 2000. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, FAO Forestry paper No. 140.
8. Gardes, M., and Bruns, T.D. 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes - application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 2: 113-118.
9. Hawksworth, D.L. 2001. The magnitude of fungal diversity: the 1.5 million species estimate revisited. Mycol. Res. 105: 1422-1432.
10. Hawksworth, D.L. 2004. Fungal diversity and its implications for genetic resource collections. Stud. Mycol. 50: 9-18.
11. Hyde, K.D., Cai, L., and Jeewon, R. 2005. Tropical fungi. In The fungal community. Its organization and role in the ecosystem. Edited by J. Dighton, J.F. White, and P. Oudemans. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. pp. 93-115.
12. Jeewon, R., Liew, E.C.Y., and Hyde, K.D. 2004. Phylogenetic evaluation of species nomenclature of Pestalotiopsis in relation to host association. Fungal Divers. 17: 39-55.
13. Kumaresan, V., and Suryanarayanan, T.S. 2002. Endophyte assemblages in young, mature and senescent leaves of Rhizophora apiculata: evidence for the role of endophytes in mangrove litter degradation. Fungal Divers. 9: 81-91.
14. Lu, G., Cannon, P.P., Reid, A., and Simmons, C.M. 2004. Diversity and molecular relationships of endophytic Colletotrichum isolates from the Iwokrama Forest Reserve, Guyana. Mycol. Res. 108: 53-63.
15. Lutzoni, F., Wagner, P., Reeb, V., and Zoller, S. 2000. Integrating ambiguously aligned regions of DNA sequences in phylogenetic analyses without violating positional homology. Syst. Biol. 49: 628-651.
16. Maddison, D.R., and Maddison, W.P. 2000. MacClade 4. Analysis of phytogeny and character evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass., USA.
17. Okane, I., Lumyong, S., Nakagiri, A., and Ito, T. 2003. Extensive host range of an endophytic fungus, Guignardia endophyllicola (anamorph: Phyllosticta capitalensis). Mycoscience, 44: 353-363.
18. Osono, T., Bhatta, B.K., and Takeda, H. 2004. Phyllosphere fungi on living and decomposing leaves of giant dogwood. Mycoscience, 45: 35-41.
19. Pandey, A.K., Reddy, M.S., and Suryanarayanan, T.S. 2003. ITS-RFLP and ITS sequence analysis of a foliar endophytic Phyllosticta from different tropical trees. Mycol. Res. 107: 439-444.
20. Parmeter, J.R. 1958. An effect of substrate on spore form in Phomopsis. Phytopathology, 48: 396-397.
21. Rehner, S.A., and Uecker, FA. 1994. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer phylogeny and host diversity in the Coelomycete Phomopsis. Can. J. Bot. 72: 1666-1674.
22. Rekab, D., Del Sorbo, G., Reggio, C., Zoina, A., and Firrao, G. 2004. Polymorphisms in nuclear rDNA and mtDNA reveal the polyphyletic nature of isolates of Phomopsis pathogenic to sunflower and a tight monophyletic clade of defined geographic origin. Mycol. Res. 108: 393-402.
23. Rodrigues, K.F., Sieber, T.N., Gr̈nig, C.R., and Holdenrieder, O. 2004. Characterization of Guignardia mangiferae isolated from tropical plants based on morphology, ISSR-PCR amplifications and ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 sequences. Mycol. Res. 108: 45-52.
24. Suryanarayanan, T.S. 1992. Light-incubation: a neglected procedure in mycology. Mycologist, 6: 144.
25. Suryanarayanan, T.S., and Hawksworth, D.L. 2005. Fungi from little-explored and extreme habitats. In Bio-diversity of fungi: their role in human life. Edited by S.K. Deshmukh and M.K. Rai. Oxford & IBH Publishing, New Delhi, India, pp. 33-48.
26. Suryanarayanan, T.S., and Johnson, J.A. 2005. Fungal endophytes of tropical plants: a critical review. In Microbial diversity. Edited by T. Sathyanarayana and B.N. Johri. I.K. International Publishing House, New Delhi, India, pp. 207-224.
27. Suryanarayanan, T.S., Kumaresan, V., and Johnson, J.A. 1998. Foliar fungal endophytes from two species of the mangrove Rhizophora. Can. J. Microbiol. 44: 1003-1006.
28. Suryanarayanan, T.S., Murali, T.S., and Venkatesan, G. 2002. Occurrence and distribution of fungal endophytes in tropical forests across a rainfall gradient. Can. J. Bot. 80: 818-826.
29. Suryanarayanan, T.S., Venkatesan, G., and Murali, T.S. 2003. Endophytic fungal communities in leaves of tropical forest trees: diversity and distribution patterns. Curr. Sci. 85: 489-493.
30. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Ver. 4 [computer program]. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass., USA.
31. Taylor, J.W., Jacobson, D.J., Kroken, S., Kasuga, T., Geiser, D.M., Hibbett, D.S., and Fisher, M.C. 2000. Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. Fungal Genet. Biol. 31: 21-32.
32. Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F., and Higgins, D.G. 1997. The Clustal X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 24: 4876-4882.
33. Uecker, F.A. 1988. A world list of Phomopsis names with notes on nomenclature, morphology and biology. Mycologica Memoirs # 13. J. Cramer, Berlin, Germany.
34. Van Bael, S.A., Maynard, Z., Rojas, E., Mejia, L.C., Kyllo, D.A., Herre, E.A., Robbins, N., Bischoff, J.F., and Arnold, A.E. 2005. Emerging perspectives on the ecological roles of endophytic fungi in tropical plants. In The fungal community. Its organization and role in the ecosystem. Edited by J. Dighton, J.F. White and P. Oudemans. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. pp. 181-191.
35. Van der Aa, H.A., Noordeloos, M.E., and de Gruyter, J. 1990. Species concepts in some larger genera of the Coelomycetes. Stud. Mycol. 32: 3-19.
36. White, T.J., Bruns, T., Lee, S., and Taylor, J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Edited by M.A. Innis, D.H. Gelfand, J.J. Sninsky, and T.J. White. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., USA. pp. 315-322.