Reassessment of Phomopsis species on grapevines

Australasian Plant Pathology

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 27-39

  Van Niekerk, J M ^a   Groenewald, J Z ^a,b   Farr, D F ^c   Fourie, P H ^a   Halleen, F ^d   Crous, P W ^a,b  

^a STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^b CBS KNAW FUNGAL BIODIVERSITY CENTRE   (Netherlands)

^c AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^d ARC INFRUITEC NIETVOORBIJ   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Diaporthe perjuncta; Grapevines; Phomopsis; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

ARUNDINARIA; DIAPORTHE HELIANTHI; DIAPORTHE PERJUNCTA; DIAPORTHE VITICOLA; HELIANTHUS; PHOMOPSIS; PHOMOPSIS AMYGDALI; PHOMOPSIS VITICOLA; PRUNUS PERSICA; VITIS;

EID: 18044378419     PISSN: 08153191     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/AP04072     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Farr DF, Castlebury LA, Pardo-Schultheiss RA (1999) Phomopsis amygdali causes peach shoot blight of cultivated peach trees in the southeastern United States. Mycologia 91, 1008-1015.
2. Hillis DM, Bull JJ (1993) An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42, 182-192.
3. Kajitani Y, Kanematsu S (2000) Diaporthe kyushuensis sp. nov. the teleomorph of the causal fungus of grapevine swelling arm in Japan, and its anamorph Phomopsis vitimegaspora. Mycoscience 41, 111-114.
4. Kuo K. Leu L-S (1998) Phomopsis vitimegaspora: a pathogenic Phomopsis from vines. Mycotaxon 66, 497-499.
5. Lee SB. Taylor JW (1990) Isolation of DNA from fungal mycelia and single spores. In 'PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications'. (Eds MA Innis, DH Gelfand, JJ Sninsky, TJ White) pp. 282-287. (Academic Press: San Diego)
6. Melanson DL, Rawnsley B, Scheper RWA (2002) Molecular detection of Phomopsis taxa 1 and 2 in grapevine canes and buds. Australasian Plant Pathology 31, 67-73. doi: 10.1071/APO1075
7. Merrin SJ, Nair NG, Tarran J (1995) Variation in Phomopsis recorded on grapevine in Australia and its taxonomic and biological implications. Australasian Plant Pathology 24, 44-56.
8. Moleleki N, Preisig O, Wingfield MJ, Crous PW, Wingfield BD (2002) PCR-RFLP and sequence data delineate several Diaporthe species associated with stone and pome fruit trees in South Africa. European Journal of Plant Pathology 108, 909-912. doi: 10.1023/A:1021296801350
9. Mostert L, Crous PW, Kang J-C, Phillips AJL (2001) Species of Phomopsis and a Libertella sp. occurring on grapevines with specific reference to South Africa: morphological, cultural, molecular and pathological characterization. Mycologia 93, 146-167.
10. Muntañola-Cvetković M, Mihaljčević M, Petrov M (1981) On the identity of the causative agent of a serious Phomopsis-Diaporthe disease in sunflower plants. Nova Hedwigia 34, 417-435.
11. Niessl G von (1876) Hedwigia 15, 153.
12. Pearson RC, Goheen C (1994) Phomopsis cane and leaf spot. In 'Compendium of grape diseases'. (Eds WB Hewitt, RC Pearson) pp. 17-18. (APS Press: St Paul, MI)
13. Phillips AJL (1999) The relationship between Diaporthe perjuncta and Phomopsis viticola on grapevines. Mycologia 91, 1001-1007.
14. Pine TS (1958) Etiology of the dead-arm. Phytopathology 48, 192-197.
15. Pine TS (1959) Development of the grape dead-arm disease. Phytopathology 49, 738-743.
16. Pscheidt JW, Pearson RC (1989) Effect of grapevine training systems and pruning practices on occurrence of Phomopsis cane and leaf spot. Plant Disease 73, 825-828.
17. Rambaut A (2002) 'Sequence Alignment Editor. Version 2.0.' (Department of Zoology, University of Oxford: Oxford)
18. Rawnsley B, Scott E, Wicks T, Stummer B (2001) Phomopsis type 1 : a peculiar puzzle to solve. The Australian Grapegrower & Winemaker 452, 41-43.
19. Rawnsley B, Wicks T (2002) Fungicides for cane and leaf spot control. The Australian Grapegrower & Winemaker 465, 20.
20. Rayner RW (1970) ' A mycological colour chart.' (Commonwealth Mycological Institute: Kew)
21. Rehner SA, Uecker FA (1994) Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer phylogeny and host diversity in the coelomycete Phomopsis. Canadian Journal of Botany 72, 1666-1674.
22. Saccardo PA (1882) Omnium hucusque cognitorum. Sylloge Fungorum 1, 1-766.
23. SAS (1999) 'SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 8.2, volume 2.' (SAS Institute Inc.: SAS Campus Drive, Cary, NC)
24. Scheper RWA, Crane DC, Whisson DL, Scott ES (2000) The Diaporthe teleomorph of Phomopsis Taxon 1 on grapevines. Mycological Research 104, 226-231. doi: 10.1017/S095375629900115X
25. Swofford DL (2000) 'Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Version 4.0b10.' (Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA)
26. Uddin W, Stevenson KL, Pardo-Schultheiss RA (1997) Pathogenicity of a species of Phomopsis causing shoot blight on peach in Georgia and evaluation of possible infection courts. Plant Disease 81, 983-989.
27. Uddin W, Stevenson KL, Pardo-Schultheiss RA, Rehner SA (1998) Pathogenicity and molecular characterization of three Phomopsis isolates from peach, plum, and Asian pear. Plant Disease 82, 732-737.
28. Uecker FA (1988) A world list of Phomopsis names with notes on nomenclature, morphology and biology. Mycologia Memoir 13, 1-231.
29. Wehmeyer LE (1933) 'The genus Diaporthe Nitsche and its segregates.' (University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor)
30. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In 'PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications'. (Eds MA Innis, DH Gelfand, JJ Sninsky, TJ White): pp. 315-322. (Academic Press: San Diego)