Large scale molecular simulations of nanotoxicity

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 329-343

  Jimenez Cruz, Camilo A ^a   Kang, Seung gu ^a   Zhou, Ruhong ^a,b  

^a IBM T J WATSON RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON NANOTUBE; FULLERENE DERIVATIVE; GELATINASE B; GRAPHENE; METAL NANOPARTICLE; QUANTUM DOT; CARBON; GRAPHITE; MMP9 PROTEIN, HUMAN; NANOMATERIAL; NANOPARTICLE;

ADSORPTION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL VIABILITY; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CYTOTOXICITY; ENDOCYTOSIS; HUMAN; METASTASIS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NANOMEDICINE; NANOTOXICITY; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SIMULATION; TOXICITY; TUMOR GROWTH; ANIMAL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METABOLISM; MOUSE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NEOPLASM; PROCEDURES; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

ADSORPTION; ANIMALS; CARBON; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FULLERENES; GRAPHITE; HUMANS; MATRIX METALLOPROTEINASE 9; MICE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NANOPARTICLES; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NANOTUBES, CARBON; NEOPLASM METASTASIS; NEOPLASMS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 84902788502     PISSN: 19395094     EISSN: 1939005X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1271     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Kroto HW, Heath JR, O'Brien SC, Curl RF, Smalley RE. C60: Buckmisnterfulleren. Nature 1985, 318:162-163.
2. Iijima S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 1991, 354:56-58.
3. Rao CNR, Sood AK, Subrahmanyam KS, Govindaraj A. Graphene: the new two-dimensional nanomaterial. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Jan. 2009, 48:7752-7777.
4. Noon WH, Kong Y, Ma J. Molecular dynamics analysis of a buckyball-antibody complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99(Suppl 2):6466-6470.
5. Jain PK, El-Sayed IH, El-Sayed MA. Au nanoparticles target cancer. Nano Today 2007, 2:18-29.
6. Smart SK, Cassady AI, Lu GQ, Martin DJ. The biocompatibility of carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2006, 44:1034-1047.
7. Dietz K-J, Herth S. Plant nanotoxicology. Trends Plant Sci 2011, 16:582-589.
8. Mahmoudi M, Azadmanesh K, Shokrgozar MA, Journeay WS, Laurent S. Effect of nanoparticles on the cell life cycle. Chem Rev 2011, 111:3407-3432.
9. Aillon KL, Xie Y, El-Gendy N, Berkland CJ, Forrest ML. Effects of nanomaterial physicochemical properties on in vivo toxicity. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2009, 61:457-466.
10. Brayner R. The toxicological impact of nanoparticles. Nano Today 2008, 3:48-55.
11. Fischer HC, Chan WCW. Nanotoxicity: the growing need for in vivo study. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2007, 18:565-571.
12. Kagan VE, Bayir H, Shvedova AA. Nanomedicine and nanotoxicology: two sides of the same coin. Nanomedicine 2005, 1:313-316.
13. Nel AE, Mädler L, Velegol D, Xia T, Hoek EMV, Somasundaran P, Klaessig F, Castranova V, Thompson M. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat Mater 2009, 8:543-557.
14. Shvedova AA, Kisin ER, Porter D, Schulte P, Kagan VE, Fadeel B, Castranova V. Mechanisms of pulmonary toxicity and medical applications of carbon nanotubes: two faces of Janus? Pharmacol Ther 2009, 121:192-204.
15. Suh WH, Suslick KS, Stucky GD, Suh Y-H. Nanotechnology, nanotoxicology, and neuroscience. Prog Neurobiol 2009, 87:133-170.
16. Sharifi S, Behzadi S, Laurent S, Forrest ML, Stroeve P, Mahmoudi M. Toxicity of nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 2012, 41:2323-2343.
17. Sotiriou GA, Pratsinis SE. Antibacterial activity of nanosilver ions and particles. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 44:5649-5654.
18. Hu W, Peng C, Luo W, Lv M, Li X, Li D, Huang Q, Fan C. Graphene-based antibacterial paper. ACS Nano 2010, 4:4317-4323.
19. Wong-Ekkabut J, Baoukina S, Triampo W, Tang I-M, Tieleman DP, Monticelli L. Computer simulation study of fullerene translocation through lipid membranes. Nat Nanotechnol 2008, 3:363-368.
20. Yang K, Ma Y. Computer simulation of the translocation of nanoparticles with different shapes across a lipid bilayer. Nat Nanotechnol 2010, 5:579-583.
21. Vaitheeswaran S, Garcia AE. Protein stability at a carbon nanotube interface. J Chem Phys 2011, 134:125101.
22. Lynch I, Dawson K. Protein-nanoparticle interactions. Nano Today 2008, 3:4047.
23. Kang Y, Wang Q, Liu Y-C, Wu T, Chen Q, Guan W-J. Dynamic mechanism of collagen-like peptide encapsulated into carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem B 2008, 112:4801-4807.
24. Shi B, Zuo G, Xiu P, Zhou R. Binding preference of carbon nanotube over proline-rich motif ligand on SH3-domain: a comparison with different force fields. J Phys Chem B 2013, 117:3541-3547.
25. Shen J-W, Wu T, Wang Q, Kang Y. Induced stepwise conformational change of human serum albumin on carbon nanotube surfaces. Biomaterials 2008, 29:3847-3855.
26. Gao H, Kong Y. Simulation of DNA-nanotube interactions. Annu Rev Mater Res 2004, 34:123-150.
27. Thanh NTK, Green LAW. Functionalisation of nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Nano Today 2010, 5:213-230.
28. Partha R, Conyers JL. Biomedical applications of functionalized fullerene-based nanomaterials. Int J Nanomedicine 2009, 4:261-275.
29. Bitar A, Ahmad NM, Fessi H, Elaissari A. Silica-based nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Drug Discov Today 2012, 17:1147-1154.
30. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM, Ferguson DM, Spellmeyer DC, Fox T, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 1995, 117:5179-5197.
31. Duan Y, Wu C, Chowdhury S, Lee MC, Xiong G, Zhang W, Yang R, Cieplak P, Luo R, Lee T, et al. A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations. J Comput Chem 2003, 24:1999-2012.
32. †. J Phys Chem B 1998, 5647:10-12.
33. Ren P, Ponder JW. Polarizable atomic multipole water model for molecular mechanics simulation. J Phys Chem B 2003, 107:5933-5947.
34. De Miranda Tomásio S, Walsh TR. Atomistic modelling of the interaction between peptides and carbon nanotubes. Mol Phys 2007, 105:221-229.
35. Ueda Y, Taketomi H, Go N. Studies on protein folding, unfolding, and fluctuations by computer simulation. II. A. Three-dimensional lattice model of lysozyme. Biopolymers 1978, 17:1531-1548.
36. Clementi C, Nymeyer H, Onuchic JN. Topological and energetic factors: what determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and 'en-route' intermediates for protein folding? An investigation for small globular proteins. J Mol Biol 2000, 298:937-953.
37. Marrink SJ, Risselada HJ, Yefimov S, Tieleman DP, de Vries AH. The MARTINI force field: coarse grained model for biomolecular simulations. J Phys Chem B 2007, 111:7812-7824.
38. Izvekov S, Voth GA. A multiscale coarse-graining method for biomolecular systems. J Phys Chem B 2005, 109:2469-2473.
39. Marrink SJ, de Vries AH, Tieleman DP. Lipids on the move: simulations of membrane pores, domains, stalks and curves. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009, 1788:149-168.
40. Raffaini G, Ganazzoli F. Surface topography effects in protein adsorption on nanostructured carbon allotropes. Langmuir 2013, 29:4883-4893.
41. Ou L, Luo Y, Wei G. Atomic-level study of adsorption, conformational change, and dimerization of an α-helical peptide at graphene surface. J Phys Chem B 2011, 115:9813-9822.
42. Balamurugan K, Subramanian V. Length-dependent stability of α-helical peptide upon adsorption to single-walled carbon nanotube. Biopolymers 2013, 99:357-369.
43. Balamurugan K, Gopalakrishnan R, Raman SS, Subramanian V. Exploring the changes in the structure of α-helical peptides adsorbed onto a single walled carbon nanotube using classical molecular dynamics simulation. J Phys Chem B 2010, 114:14048-14058.
44. Gopalakrishnan R, Balamurugan K, Singam ERA, Sundaraman S, Subramanian V. Adsorption of collagen onto single walled carbon nanotubes: a molecular dynamics investigation. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2011, 13:13046-13057.
45. Balamurugan K. Effect of curvature on the α-helix breaking tendency of carbon based nanomaterials. J Phys Chem C 2011, 115:8886-8892.
46. Mao X, Wang Y, Liu L, Niu L, Yang Y, Wang C. Molecular-level evidence of the surface-induced transformation of peptide structures revealed by scanning tunneling microscopy. Langmuir 2009, 25:8849-8853.
47. Zuo G, Zhou X, Huang Q, Fang H, Zhou R. Adsorption of villin headpiece onto graphene, carbon nanotube, and C60: effect of contacting surface curvatures on binding affinity. J Phys Chem C 2011, 115:23323-23328.
48. Ge C, Du J, Zhao L, Wang L, Liu Y, Li D, Yang Y, Zhou R, Zhao Y, Chai Z, et al. Binding of blood proteins to carbon nanotubes reduces cytotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108:16968-16973.
49. Tomásio S, Walsh T. Modeling the binding affinity of peptides for graphitic surfaces. Influences of aromatic content and interfacial shape. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113:8778-8785.
50. Walsh TR, Tomasio SM. Investigation of the influence of surface defects on peptide adsorption onto carbon nanotubes. Mol Biosyst 2010, 6:1707-1718.
51. Xie Y, Kong Y, Gao H, Soh AK. Molecular dynamics simulation of polarizable carbon nanotubes. Comput Mater Sci 2007, 40:460-465.
52. Yang Z, Wang Z, Tian X, Xiu P, Zhou R. Amino acid analogues bind to carbon nanotube via π-π interactions: comparison of molecular mechanical and quantum mechanical calculations. J Chem Phys 2012, 136:025103.
53. Wang L, Jiang X, Ji Y, Bai R, Zhao Y, Wu X, Chen C. Surface chemistry of gold nanorods: origin of cell membrane damage and cytotoxicity. Nanoscale 2013, 5:8384-8391.
54. Dykman L, Khlebtsov N. Gold nanoparticles in biomedical applications: recent advances and perspectives. Chem Soc Rev 2012, 41:2256-2282.
55. Tiwari P, Vig K, Dennis V, Singh S. Functionalized gold nanoparticles and their biomedical applications. Nanomaterials 2011, 1:31-63.
56. Sarikaya M, Tamerler C, Jen A. Molecular biomimetics: nanotechnology through biology. Nat Mater 2003, 25:577-585.
57. Wang L, Li J, Pan J, Jiang X, Ji Y, Li Y, Qu Y, Zhao Y, Wu X, Chen C. Revealing the binding structure of the protein corona on gold nanorods using synchrotron radiation-based techniques: understanding the reduced damage in cell membranes. J Am Chem Soc 2013, 135:17359-17368.
58. Ahamed M, Alsalhi MS, Siddiqui MKJ. Silver nanoparticle applications and human health. Clin Chim Acta 2010, 411:1841-1848.
59. Kim K-J, Sung WS, Suh BK, Moon S-K, Choi J-S, Kim JG, Lee DG. Antifungal activity and mode of action of silver nano-particles on Candida albicans. Biometals 2009, 22:235-242.
60. Li R, Chen R, Chen P, Wen Y, Ke PC, Cho SS. Computational and experimental characterizations of silver nanoparticle-apolipoprotein biocorona. J Phys Chem B 2013, 117:13451-13456.
61. Ding F, Radic S, Chen R, Chen P, Geitner NK, Brown JM, Ke PC. Direct observation of a single nanoparticle-ubiquitin corona formation. Nanoscale 2013, 5:9162-9169.
62. Bruchez M, Moronne M, Gin P, Weiss S, Alivisatos AP. Semiconductor nanocrystals as fluorescent biological labels. Science 1998, 281:2013-2016.
63. Dabbousi BO, Mikulec FV, Heine JR, Mattoussi H, Ober R, Jensen KF, Bawendi MG. (CdSe)ZnS core-shell quantum dots: synthesis and characterization of a size series of highly luminescent nanocrystallites. J Phys Chem B 1997, 101:9463-9475.
64. Alivisatos P. The use of nanocrystals in biological detection. Nat Biotechnol 2004, 22:47-52.
65. Chan WCW, Maxwell DJ, Gao X, Bailey RE, Han M, Nie S. Luminescent quantum dots for multiplexed biological detection and imaging. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2002, 13:40-46.
66. Hardman R. A toxicologic review of quantum dots: toxicity depends on physicochemical and environmental factors. Environ Health Perspect 2006, 114:165-172.
67. Lovrić J, Bazzi HS, Cuie Y, Fortin GRA, Winnik FM, Maysinger D. Differences in subcellular distribution and toxicity of green and red emitting CdTe quantum dots. J Mol Med (Berl) 2005, 83:377-385.
68. Azpiroz JM, Matxain JM, Infante I, Lopez X, Ugalde JM. A DFT/TDDFT study on the optoelectronic properties of the amine-capped magic (CdSe)13 nanocluster. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2013, 15:10996-11005.
69. 22 on WW domain: implication on signal transduction pathway. Sci Rep 2012, 2:957.
70. n nanoparticles: antineoplastic activity of high efficiency and low toxicity. Nano Lett Oct. 2005, 5:2050-2057.
71. 22 and its implication for de novo design of nanomedicine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012, 109:15431-15436.
72. Pogodin S, Baulin V. Can a carbon nanotube pierce through a phospholipid bilayer? ACS Nano 2010, 4:5293-5300.
73. Titov AV, Král P, Pearson R. Sandwiched graphene-membrane superstructures. ACS Nano 2010, 4:229-234.
74. Shi X, Kong Y, Gao H. Coarse grained molecular dynamics and theoretical studies of carbon nanotubes entering cell membrane. Acta Mech Sin 2008, 24:161-169.
75. Wallace EJ, Sansom MSP. Carbon nanotube/detergent interactions via coarse-grained molecular dynamics. Nano Lett 2007, 7:1923-1928.
76. Baoukina S, Monticelli L, Tieleman DP. Interaction of pristine and functionalized carbon nanotubes with lipid membranes. J Phys Chem B 2013, 117:12113-12123.
77. D'Rozario RSG, Wee CL, Wallace EJ, Sansom MSP. The interaction of C60 and its derivatives with a lipid bilayer via molecular dynamics simulations. Nanotechnology 2009, 20:115102.
78. Izvekov S, Violi A, Voth GA. Systematic coarse-graining of nanoparticle interactions in molecular dynamics simulation. J Phys Chem B 2005, 109:17019-17024.
79. Tu Y, Lv M, Xiu P, Huynh T, Zhang M, Castelli M, Liu Z, Huang Q, Fan C, Fang H, et al. Destructive extraction of phospholipids from Escherichia coli membranes by graphene nanosheets. Nat Nanotechnol 2013, 8:594-601.