Co-authorship and bibliographic coupling network effects on citations

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  Biscaro, Claudio ^a,b,c   Giupponi, Carlo ^a  

^a CA' FOSCARI UNIVERSITY OF VENICE   (Italy)

^b CA' FOSCARI UNIVERSITY OF VENICE   (Italy)

^c JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC COUPLING NETWORK; CITATION ANALYSIS; CO AUTHORSHIP; CONTENT ANALYSIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SOCIAL NETWORK; HUMAN; SOCIAL SUPPORT; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; HUMANS; PUBLICATIONS; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 84902668882     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099502     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ioannidis JP (2006) Concentration of the most-cited papers in the scientific literature: analysis of journal ecosystems. Plos One 1: e5.
2. Uddin S, Hossain L, Rasmussen K (2013) Network Effects on Scientific Collaborations. Plos One 8.
3. Wallace ML, Larivière V, Gingras Y (2012) A small world of citations? The influence of collaboration networks on citation practices. Plos One 7: e33339.
4. Moretti E (2012) The new geography of jobs: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
5. Bettencourt LM, Lobo J, Helbing D, Kühnert C, West GB (2007) Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 104: 7301-7306. (Pubitemid 47186049)
6. Heinze T, Bauer G (2007) Characterizing creative scientists in nano-S&T: Productivity, multidisciplinarity, and network brokerage in a longitudinal perspective. Scientometrics 70: 811-830.
7. Yan EJ, Ding Y (2009) Applying Centrality Measures to Impact Analysis: A Coauthorship Network Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60: 2107-2118.
8. Newman MEJ (2009) The first-mover advantage in scientific publication. Epl 86.
9. Mazloumian A, Eom YH, Helbing D, Lozano S, Fortunato S (2011) How Citation Boosts Promote Scientific Paradigm Shifts and Nobel Prizes. Plos One 6.
10. Catmull E (2008) How Pixar fosters collective creativity: Harvard Business School Publishing.
11. Dekas KH, Bauer TN, Welle B, Kurkoski J, Sullivan S (2013) Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, version 2.0: A Review and Qualitative Investigation of OCBs for Knowledge Workers at Google and Beyond. Academy of Management Perspectives 27: 219-237.
12. Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly: 716-749.
13. Perry-Smith JE (2006) Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal 49: 85-101.
14. Simonton DK (1995) Foresight in insight? A Darwinian answer. In: Sternberg RJ, Davidson JE, editors. The nature of insight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 465-494.
15. Yin L-c, Kretschmer H, Hanneman RA, Liu Z-y (2006) Connection and stratification in research collaboration: An analysis of the COLLNET network. Information Processing & Management 42: 1599-1613. (Pubitemid 43825593)
16. Kessler MM (1963) Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American documentation 14: 10-25.
17. Polanyi M (2000) The republic of science: its political and economic theory. Minerva 38: 1-21.
18. Sun XL, Kaur J, Milojevic S, Flammini A, Menczer F (2013) Social Dynamics of Science. Scientific Reports 3.
19. Newman MEJ (2001) The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98: 404-409.
20. Chen CM (2004) Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 5303-5310.
21. Janssen MA, Schoon ML, Ke WM, Borner K (2006) Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 16: 240-252. (Pubitemid 44093218)
22. Janssen MA (2007) An update on the scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability, and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Ecology and Society 12.
23. Dorta-Gonzalez P, Dorta-Gonzalez MI (2013) Impact maturity times and citation time windows: The 2-year maximum journal impact factor. Journal of Informetrics 7: 593-602.
24. Redner S (1998) How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. European Physical Journal B 4: 131-134.
25. Blei DM (2012) Probabilistic Topic Models. Communications of the Acm 55: 77-84.
26. Blei DM, Lafferty JD (2007) A correlated topic model of science. Annals of Applied Statistics 1: 17-35.
27. Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3: 993-1022.
28. Newman M (2010) Networks: An Introduction: OUP Oxford.
29. Chang J, Blei DM (2010) Hierarchical relational models for document networks. The Annals of Applied Statistics 4: 124-150.
30. Csardi G, Nepusz T (2006) The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems 1695.
31. Uddin S, Hossain L, Abbasi A, Rasmussen K (2012) Trend and efficiency analysis of co-authorship network. Scientometrics 90: 687-699.
32. Strzepek KM, Yates D, El Quosy D (1996) Vulnerability assessment of water resources in Egypt to climatic change in the Nile Basin. Climate Research 6: 89-95.
33. Jose A, Sosa L, Cruz N (1996) Vulnerability assessment of Angat Water Reservoir to climate change. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 92: 191-201.
34. Kaplan S, Vakili K (2012) Identifying Breakthroughs: Cognitive vs. Economic.
35. Redner S (2005) Citation Statistics from 110 Years of Physical Review. Physics Today 58: 49-54.
36. Frigotto ML, Riccaboni M (2011) A few special cases: scientific creativity and network dynamics in the field of rare diseases. Scientometrics 89: 397-420.
37. Larsen PO, von Ins M (2010) The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics 84: 575-603.
38. Maske KL, Durden GC, Gaynor PE (2003) Determinants of scholarly productivity among male and female economists. Economic Inquiry 41: 555-564. (Pubitemid 37347074)
39. Goh KI, Oh E, Kahng B, Kim D (2003) Betweenness centrality correlation in social networks. Physical Review E 67: 017101.
40. Simon HA, Chase WG (1973) Skill in chess: Experiments with chess-playing tasks and computer simulation of skilled performance throw light on some human perceptual and memory processes. American scientist 61: 394-403.
41. Simonton DK (1999) Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian? Psychological Inquiry 10: 309-328.
42. Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, et al. (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 100: 8074-8079. (Pubitemid 36842500)
43. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Global environmental change 16: 268-281.
44. Schilling MA (2005) A" small-world" network model of cognitive insight. Creativity Research Journal 17: 131-154. (Pubitemid 41180187)
45. Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110: 349-399.