Erratum: The form of a conditioned stimulus can influence the degree to which it acquires incentive motivational properties (PLoS ONE (2014) 9, 6, (e98163) DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0098163);The form of a conditioned stimulus can influence the degree to which it acquires incentive motivational properties

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  Meyer, Paul J ^a,b   Cogan, Elizabeth S ^a   Robinson, Terry E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE; ALPHA 2 ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; CENTRAL STIMULANT AGENT; YOHIMBINE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; HABITUATION; MALE; MOTIVATION; NONHUMAN; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; REWARD; STRESS; VISUAL STIMULATION; ANIMAL; CONDITIONED REFLEX; DRUG EFFECTS; HEARING; PHYSIOLOGY; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; VISION;

ADRENERGIC ALPHA-2 RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS; AMPHETAMINE; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; GOALS; MALE; MOTIVATION; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOHIMBINE;

EID: 84902603309     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107194     Document Type: Erratum

References (93)

1. Holland PC (1977) Conditioned stimulus as a determinant of the form of the Pavlovian conditioned response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 3: 77-104.
2. Flagel SB, Akil H, Robinson TE (2009) Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction. Neuropharmacology 56 Suppl 1: 139-148.
3. Meyer PJ, Lovic V, Saunders BT, Yager LM, Flagel SB, et al. (2012) Quantifying individual variation in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to reward cues. PLoS One 7: e38987.
4. Saunders BT, Robinson TE (2013) Individual variation in resisting temptation: Implications for addiction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37: 1955-1975.
5. Robinson TE, Yager LM, Cogan ES, Saunders BT (2014) On the motivational properties of reward cues: Individual differences. Neuropharmacology 76, Part B: 450-459.
6. Milton AL, Everitt BJ (2010) The psychological and neurochemical mechanisms of drug memory reconsolidation: implications for the treatment of addiction. Eur J Neurosci 31: 2308-2319.
7. Bindra D (1978) How adaptive behavior is produced: A perceptual- motivation alternative to response reinforcement. Behav Brain Res 1: 41-91.
8. Berridge KC (2001) Reward learning: Reinforcement, incentives, and expectations. In: Medin DL, editor. Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: Academic Press Inc. pp. 223-278.
9. Flagel SB, Watson SJ, Robinson TE, Akil H (2007) Individual differences in the propensity to approach signals vs goals promote different adaptations in the dopamine system of rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 191: 599-607. (Pubitemid 46355888)
10. Zener K (1937) The significance of behavior accompanying conditioned salivary secretion for theories of the conditioned response. American Journal of Psychology 50: 384-403.
11. Demos KE, Heatherton TF, Kelley WM (2012) Individual Differences in Nucleus Accumbens Activity to Food and Sexual Images Predict Weight Gain and Sexual Behavior. The Journal of Neuroscience 32: 5549-5552.
12. Boakes R (1977) Performance on learning to associate a stimulus with positive reinforcement. In: Davis H, Hurwitz H, editors. Operant-Pavlovian interactions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 67-97.
13. Mahler SV, Berridge KC (2009) Which cue to "want?" Central amygdala opioid activation enhances and focuses incentive salience on a prepotent reward cue. J Neurosci 29: 6500-6513.
14. Mahler SV, Berridge KC (2012) What and when to "want"? Amygdala-based focusing of incentive salience upon sugar and sex. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 221: 407-426.
15. Difeliceantonio AG, Berridge KC (2012) Which cue to 'want'? Opioid stimulation of central amygdala makes goal-trackers show stronger goal-tracking, just as sign-trackers show stronger sign-tracking. Behav Brain Res.
16. Yager LM, Robinson TE (2010) Cue-induced reinstatement of food seeking in rats that differ in their propensity to attribute incentive salience to food cues. Behav Brain Res 214: 30-34.
17. Lomanowska AM, Lovic V, Rankine MJ, Mooney SJ, Robinson TE, et al. (2011) Inadequate early social experience increases the incentive salience of reward-related cues in adulthood. Behav Brain Res 220: 91-99.
18. Robinson TE, Flagel SB (2009) Dissociating the predictive and incentive motivational properties of reward-related cues through the study of individual differences. Biol Psychiatry 65: 869-873.
19. Flagel SB, Clark JJ, Robinson TE, Mayo L, Czuj A, et al. (2011) A selective role for dopamine in stimulus-reward learning. Nature 469: 53-57.
20. Saunders BT, Robinson TE (2010) A cocaine cue acts as an incentive stimulus in some but not others: implications for addiction. Biol Psychiatry 67: 730-736.
21. Saunders BT, Robinson TE (2011) Individual Variation in the Motivational Properties of Cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology 36: 1668-1676.
22. Yager LM, Robinson TE (2013) A classically conditioned cocaine cue acquires greater control over motivated behavior in rats prone to attribute incentive salience to a food cue. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 226: 217-228.
23. Meyer PJ, Ma ST, Robinson TE (2012) A cocaine cue is more preferred and evokes more frequency-modulated 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations in rats prone to attribute incentive salience to a food cue. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 219: 999-1009.
24. Saunders BT, Yager LM, Robinson TE (2013) Cue-evoked cocaine "craving": role of dopamine in the accumbens core. J Neurosci 33: 13989-14000.
25. Costa DS, Boakes RA (2007) Maintenance of responding when reinforcement becomes delayed. Learn Behav 35: 95-105. (Pubitemid 47047875)
26. Hearst E, Jenkins HM (1974) Sign tracking: The stimulus-reinforcer relation and directed action. Proceedings of the Psychonomic Society. Austin, TX.
27. Cleland GG, Davey GC (1983) Autoshaping in the rat: The effects of localizable visual and auditory signals for food. J Exp Anal Behav 40: 47-56.
28. Holland PC (1980) CS-US interval as a determinant of the form of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 6: 155-174.
29. Silva FJ, Silva KM, Pear JJ (1992) Sign- versus goal-tracking: effects of conditioned-stimulus-to-unconditioned-stimulus distance. J Exp Anal Behav 57: 17-31.
30. Tomie A (1976) Retardation of autoshaping: control by contextual stimuli. Science 192: 1244-1246.
31. Weiss SJ, Panlilio LV, Schindler CW (1993) Selective Associations Produced Solely with Appetitive Contingencies - the Stimulus Reinforcer Interaction Revisited. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 59: 309-322.
32. Timberlake W, Wahl G, King D (1982) Stimulus and response contingencies in the misbehavior of rats. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 8: 62-85.
33. Akins CK, Domjan M, Gutierrez G (1994) Topography of sexually conditioned behavior in male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) depends on the CS-US interval. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 20: 199-209.
34. Hollis K (1982) Pavlovian conditioning of signal-centered action patterns and autonomic behavior: a biological analysis of function. Advances in the study of behavior: Academic Press, Inc. pp. 1-53.
35. Cabrera F, Sanabria F, Shelley D, Killeen PR (2009) The "lunching" effect: pigeons track motion towards food more than motion away from it. Behav Processes 82: 229-235.
36. Robinson MJ, Anselme P, Fischer AM, Berridge KC (2014) Initial uncertainty in Pavlovian reward prediction persistently elevates incentive salience and extends sign-tracking to normally unattractive cues. Behav Brain Res 266C: 119-130.
37. Chang SE, Holland PC (2013) Effects of nucleus accumbens core and shell lesions on autoshaped lever-pressing. Behav Brain Res 256: 36-42.
38. Robbins TW, Koob GF (1978) Pipradrol enhances reinforcing properties of stimuli paired with brain stimulation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 8: 219-222. (Pubitemid 8313394)
39. Beninger RJ, Hanson DR, Phillips AG (1981) The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of cocaine, (+)- amphetamine and pipradrol. Br J Pharmacol 74: 149-154. (Pubitemid 12196870)
40. Mazurski EJ, Beninger RJ (1986) The effects of (+)- amphetamine and apomorphine on responding for a conditioned reinforcer. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 90: 239-243. (Pubitemid 16011362)
41. Shaham Y, Erb S, Stewart J (2000) Stress-induced relapse to heroin and cocaine seeking in rats: a review. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 33: 13-33.
42. Guy EG, Fletcher PJ (2013) The effects of nicotine exposure during Pavlovian conditioning in rats on several measures of incentive motivation for a conditioned stimulus paired with water. Psychopharmacology (Berl).
43. Guy EG, Fletcher PJ (2013) Nicotine-induced enhancement of responding for conditioned reinforcement in rats: role of prior nicotine exposure and alpha4beta2 nicotinic receptors. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 225: 429-440.
44. Palmatier MI, Liu X, Matteson GL, Donny EC, Caggiula AR, et al. (2007) Conditioned reinforcement in rats established with self-administered nicotine and enhanced by noncontingent nicotine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 195: 235-243. (Pubitemid 350045848)
45. Uslaner JM, Acerbo MJ, Jones SA, Robinson TE (2006) The attribution of incentive salience to a stimulus that signals an intravenous injection of cocaine. Behav Brain Res 169: 320-324.
46. Uslaner JM, Dell'Orco JM, Pevzner A, Robinson TE (2008) The influence of subthalamic nucleus lesions on sign-tracking to stimuli paired with food and drug rewards: facilitation of incentive salience attribution? Neuropsychopharmacology 33: 2352-2361.
47. Yager LM, Robinson TE (2012) A classically conditioned cocaine cue acquires greater control over motivated behavior in rats prone to attribute incentive salience to a food cue. Psychopharmacology (Berl).
48. Flagel SB, Robinson TE, Clark JJ, Clinton SM, Watson SJ, et al. (2010) An animal model of genetic vulnerability to behavioral disinhibition and responsiveness to reward-related cues: implications for addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 35: 388-400.
49. Grimm JW, Hope BT, Wise RA, Shaham Y (2001) Neuroadaptation. Incubation of cocaine craving after withdrawal. Nature 412: 141-142. (Pubitemid 32674700)
50. Feltenstein MW, See RE (2006) Potentiation of cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine-seeking in rats by the anxiogenic drug yohimbine. Behav Brain Res 174: 1-8. (Pubitemid 44397173)
51. Brown ZJ, Kupferschmidt DA, Erb S (2012) Reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats by the pharmacological stressors, corticotropin-releasing factor and yohimbine: role for D1/5 dopamine receptors. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 224: 431-440.
52. Anselme P, Robinson MJ, Berridge KC (2013) Reward uncertainty enhances incentive salience attribution as sign-tracking. Behav Brain Res 238: 53-61.
53. Jenkins HM, Boakes RA (1973) Observing stimulus sources that signal food or no food. J Exp Anal Behav 20: 197-207.
54. Holland PC, Asem JS, Galvin CP, Keeney CH, Hsu M, et al. (2013) Blocking in autoshaped lever-pressing procedures with rats. Learn Behav.
55. Chow JJ, Beckmann JS (2013) Dissociating sign- and goal-tracking function using a 2-CS Pavlovian conditioned approach task. Soc Neurosci Absts. San Diego, CA. pp. Online.
56. Bevins RA, Palmatier MI (2004) Extending the role of associative learning processes in nicotine addiction. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 3: 143-158.
57. Kamin LJ (1969) Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In: Campbell BA, Church RM, editors. Punishment and aversive behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. pp. 279-296.
58. Tindell AJ, Berridge KC, Zhang J, Pecina S, Aldridge JW (2005) Ventral pallidal neurons code incentive motivation: amplification by mesolimbic sensitization and amphetamine. Eur J Neurosci 22: 2617-2634. (Pubitemid 41759004)
59. Corbit LH, Balleine BW (2003) Instrumental and Pavlovian incentive processes have dissociable effects on components of a heterogeneous instrumental chain. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 29: 99-106. (Pubitemid 37177376)
60. Danna CL, Elmer GI (2010) Disruption of conditioned reward association by typical and atypical antipsychotics. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 96: 40-47.
61. Saunders BT, Robinson TE (2012) The role of dopamine in the accumbens core in the expression of Pavlovian-conditioned responses. Eur J Neurosci 36: 2521-2532.
62. Danna CL, Shepard PD, Elmer GI (2013) The habenula governs the attribution of incentive salience to reward predictive cues. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.
63. Wassum KM, Ostlund SB, Balleine BW, Maidment NT (2011) Differential dependence of Pavlovian incentive motivation and instrumental incentive learning processes on dopamine signaling. Learn Mem 18: 475-483.
64. Blaiss CA, Janak PH (2007) Post-training, but not post-reactivation, administration of amphetamine and anisomycin modulates Pavlovian conditioned approach. Neurobiol Learn Mem 87: 644-658. (Pubitemid 46505110)
65. Eyny YS, Horvitz JC (2003) Opposing roles of D1 and D2 receptors in appetitive conditioning. J Neurosci 23: 1584-1587. (Pubitemid 36314712)
66. Mingote S, de Bruin JP, Feenstra MG (2004) Noradrenaline and dopamine efflux in the prefrontal cortex in relation to appetitive classical conditioning. J Neurosci 24: 2475-2480. (Pubitemid 38327961)
67. Cheng JJ, de Bruin JP, Feenstra MG (2003) Dopamine efflux in nucleus accumbens shell and core in response to appetitive classical conditioning. Eur J Neurosci 18: 1306-1314. (Pubitemid 37115049)
68. Caggiula AR, Donny EC, Palmatier MI, Liu X, Chaudhri N, et al. (2009) The role of nicotine in smoking: a dual-reinforcement model. Nebr Symp Motiv 55: 91-109.
69. Palmatier MI, Marks KR, Jones SA, Freeman KS, Wissman KM, et al. (2013) The effect of nicotine on sign-tracking and goal-tracking in a Pavlovian conditioned approach paradigm in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 226: 247-259.
70. Palmatier MI, Matteson GL, Black JJ, Liu X, Caggiula AR, et al. (2007) The reinforcement enhancing effects of nicotine depend on the incentive value of non-drug reinforcers and increase with repeated drug injections. Drug Alcohol Depend 89: 52-59. (Pubitemid 46604860)
71. Chaudhri N, Caggiula AR, Donny EC, Palmatier MI, Liu X, et al. (2006) Complex interactions between nicotine and nonpharmacological stimuli reveal multiple roles for nicotine in reinforcement. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 184: 353-366. (Pubitemid 43255852)
72. Phillips AG, Fibiger HC (1990) Role of reward and enhancement of conditioned reward in persistence of responding for cocaine. Behav Pharmacol 1: 269-282.
73. Taylor JR, Jentsch JD (2001) Repeated intermittent administration of psychomotor stimulant drugs alters the acquisition of Pavlovian approach behavior in rats: differential effects of cocaine, d-amphetamine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine ("Ecstasy"). Biol Psychiatry 50: 137-143. (Pubitemid 32728213)
74. Robbins TW (1978) The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and nomifensine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 58: 79-87.
75. Gerdjikov TV, Baker TW, Beninger RJ (2011) Amphetamine-induced enhancement of responding for conditioned reward in rats: interactions with repeated testing. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 214: 891-899.
76. Taylor JR, Robbins TW (1984) Enhanced behavioural control by conditioned reinforcers following microinjections of d-amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 84: 405-412. (Pubitemid 15205970)
77. Gancarz AM, Ashrafioun L, San George MA, Hausknecht KA, Hawk LW Jr, et al. (2012) Exploratory studies in sensory reinforcement in male rats: effects of methamphetamine. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 20: 16-27.
78. Phillips GD, Setzu E, Hitchcott PK (2003) Facilitation of appetitive pavlovian conditioning by d-amphetamine in the shell, but not the core, of the nucleus accumbens. Behav Neurosci 117: 675-684. (Pubitemid 36935379)
79. Horsley RR, Cassaday HJ (2008) Amphetamine effects in appetitive acquisition depend on the modality of the stimulus rather than its relative validity. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 32: 1057-1063. (Pubitemid 351609245)
80. Hill R (1970) Facilitation of conditioned reinforcement as a mechanism for psychostimulation. In: Costa E, Garattini S, editors. Amphetamines and related compounds: proceedings of the Mario Negri Institute of pharmacological research. New York: Raven Press.
81. Martin-Iverson MT, Fawcett SL (1996) Pavlovian conditioning of psychomotor stimulant-induced behaviours: has convenience led us astray? Behav Pharmacol 7: 24-41. (Pubitemid 26051783)
82. Palmatier MI, O'Brien LC, Hall MJ (2012) The role of conditioning history and reinforcer strength in the reinforcement enhancing effects of nicotine in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 219: 1119-1131.
83. Winterbauer NE, Balleine BW (2007) The influence of amphetamine on sensory and conditioned reinforcement: evidence for the re-selection hypothesis of dopamine function. Front Integr Neurosci 1: 9.
84. Lloyd DR, Kausch MA, Gancarz AM, Beyley LJ, Richards JB (2012) Effects of novelty and methamphetamine on conditioned and sensory reinforcement. Behav Brain Res 234: 312-322.
85. Arroyo M, Markou A, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (1998) Acquisition, maintenance and reinstatement of intravenous cocaine self-administration under a secondorder schedule of reinforcement in rats: effects of conditioned cues and continuous access to cocaine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 140: 331-344. (Pubitemid 28562453)
86. LeBlanc KH, Ostlund SB, Maidment NT (2012) Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer in cocaine seeking rats. Behav Neurosci 126: 681-689.
87. Nair SG, Navarre BM, Cifani C, Pickens CL, Bossert JM, et al. (2011) Role of dorsal medial prefrontal cortex dopamine D1-family receptors in relapse to highfat food seeking induced by the anxiogenic drug yohimbine. Neuropsychopharmacology 36: 497-510.
88. Schroeder JP, Alisha Epps S, Grice TW, Weinshenker D (2013) The selective dopamine beta-hydroxylase inhibitor nepicastat attenuates multiple aspects of cocaine-seeking behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology 38: 1032-1038.
89. Rescorla RA (1988) Pavlovian conditioning - its not what you think it is. American Psychologist 43: 151-160.
90. Rescorla RA, Wagner AR (1972) A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In: Black AH, Prokasy WF, editors. Classical Conditioning II: Appleton-Century-Crofts. pp. 64-99.
91. Pavlov IP (1927) Conditioned reflexes: an investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. Anrep GV, translator. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
92. Solomon RL, Corbit JD (1974) An opponent-process theory of motivation. I. Temporal dynamics of affect. Psychol Rev 81: 119-145.
93. Mackintosh NJ (1974) The psychology of animal learning. New York: Academic Press.