Individual differences in the propensity to approach signals vs goals promote different adaptations in the dopamine system of rats

Psychopharmacology

Volumn 191, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 599-607

  Flagel, Shelly B ^a   Watson, Stanley J ^a   Robinson, Terry E ^b   Akil, Huda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Autoshaping; Conditioned stimuli; Dopamine; Goal tracking; Incentive salience; Motivation; Pavlovian conditioning; Sign tracking

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; DOPAMINE 1 RECEPTOR; DOPAMINE 2 RECEPTOR; DOPAMINE TRANSPORTER; MESSENGER RNA; TYROSINE 3 MONOOXYGENASE;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPAMINERGIC SYSTEM; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FOOD; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; MALE; MOTIVATION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RAT; REWARD; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TRAINING;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BRAIN; COMPULSIVE BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); CUES; DOPAMINE; DOPAMINE PLASMA MEMBRANE TRANSPORT PROTEINS; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; GOALS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; MALE; MOTIVATION; PHENOTYPE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; RECEPTORS, DOPAMINE D1; RECEPTORS, DOPAMINE D2; REWARD; RNA, MESSENGER; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS; TYROSINE 3-MONOOXYGENASE; UP-REGULATION;

EID: 33847671435     PISSN: 00333158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-006-0535-8     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Berridge KC, Robinson TE (2003) Parsing reward. Trends Neurosci 26:507-513
2. Boakes R (1977) Performance on learning to associate a stimulus with positive reinforcement. In: Davis H, HMB H (eds) Operantpavlovian interactions. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 67-97
3. Breland K, Breland M (1961) The misbehavior of organisms. Am Psychol 16:681-683
4. Brown B, Hemmes N, Vaca SCd, Pagano C (1993) Sign and goal tracking during delay and trace autoshaping in pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 21:360-368
5. Burns M, Domjan M (1996) Sign tracking versus goal tracking in the sexual conditioning of male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Processes 22:297-306
6. Dalley JW, Laane K, Theobald DE, Armstrong HC, Corlett PR, Chudasama Y, Robbins TW (2005) Time-limited modulation of appetitive Pavlovian memory by D1 and NMDA receptors in the nucleus accumbens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:6189-6194
7. Davey GC, Cleland GG, Oakley DA, Jacobs JL (1984) The effect of early feeding experience on signal-directed response topography in the rat. Physiol Behav 32:11-15
8. Falk J, Feingold D (1987) Environmental and cultural factors in the behavioral actions of drugs. In: HY M (ed) Psychopharmacology: the third generation of progress. Raven, New York, pp 1503-1510
9. Hearst E, Jenkins H (1974) Sign-tracking: the stimulus-reinforcer relation and directed action. Monograph of the Psychonomic Society, Austin
10. Heinz A, Siessmeier T, Wrase J, Hermann D, Klein S, Grusser SM, Flor H, Braus DF, Buchholz HG, Grunder G, Schreckenberger M, Smolka MN, Rosch F, Mann K, Bartenstein P (2004) Correlation between dopamine D(2) receptors in the ventral striatum and central processing of alcohol cues and craving. Am J Psychiatry 161:1783-1789
11. Holland PC (1980) CS-US interval as a determinant of the form of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responses. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Processes 6:155-174
12. Jenkins HM, Moore BR (1973) The form of the auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav 20:163-181
13. Kabbaj M, Devine DP, Savage VR, Akil H (2000) Neurobiological correlates of individual differences in novelty-seeking behavior in the rat: differential expression of stress-related molecules. J Neurosci 20:6983-6988
14. Kemenes G, Benjamin PR (1989) Goal-tracking behavior in the pond snail, Lymnaea stagnalis. Behav Neural Biol 52:260-270
15. Meneses A (2003) A pharmacological analysis of an associative learning task: 5-HT(1) to 5-HT(7) receptor subtypes function on a pavlovian/instrumental autoshaped memory. Learn Mem 10:363-372
16. Meneses A, Manuel-Apolinar L, Rocha L, Castillo E, Castillo C (2004) Expression of the 5-HT receptors in rat brain during memory consolidation. Behav Brain Res 152:425-436
17. National Research Council (2003) Guidelines for the care and use of mammals in neuroscience and behavioral research. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
18. Newlin DB (1992) A comparison of drug conditioning and craving for alcohol and cocaine. Recent Dev Alcohol 10:147-164
19. Newlin DB (1999) Evolutionary game theory and multiple chemical sensitivity. Toxicol Ind Health 15:313-322
20. Purdy JE, Roberts AC, Garcia CA (1999) Sign tracking in cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis). J Comp Psychol 113:443-449
21. Silva FJ, Silva KM, Pear JJ (1992) Sign- versus goal-tracking: effects of conditioned-stimulus-to-unconditioned-stimulus distance. J Exp Anal Behav 57:17-31
22. Tomie A (1996) Locating reward cue at response manipulandum (CAM) induces symptoms of drug abuse. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 20:505-535
23. Tomie A, Aguado AS, Pohorecky LA, Benjamin D (2000) Individual differences in pavlovian autoshaping of lever pressing in rats predict stress-induced corticosterone release and mesolimbic levels of monoamines. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 65:509-517
24. Uslaner JM, Acerbo MJ, Jones SA, Robinson TE (2006) The attribution of incentive salience to a stimulus that signals an intravenous injection of cocaine. Behav Brain Res 169:320-324
25. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G (2000) Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
26. Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Fowler JS, Thanos PP, Logan J, Gatley SJ, Gifford A, Ding YS, Wong C, Pappas N (2002) Brain DA D2 receptors predict reinforcing effects of stimulants in humans: replication study. Synapse 46:79-82
27. Williams D, Williams H (1969) Automaintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav 12:511-520