Effects of nucleus accumbens core and shell lesions on autoshaped lever-pressing

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 256, Issue , 2013, Pages 36-42

  Chang, Stephen E ^a   Holland, Peter C ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Autoshaping; Incentive salience; Nucleus accumbens core; Nucleus accumbens shell

Indexed keywords

SUCROSE;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONDITIONED REFLEX; CONNECTOME; MALE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SIGN TRACKING; ANIMAL; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FORELIMB; LONG EVANS RAT; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NERVE TRACT; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIDEORECORDING;

ANIMALS; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FORELIMB; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NEURAL PATHWAYS; NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS; RATS, LONG-EVANS; SUCROSE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84882763971     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.07.046     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Berridge K.C. Reward learning: reinforcement, incentives, and expectations. Psychol Learn Motiv Adv Res Theory 2001, 40:223-278.
2. Berridge K.C. Motivation concepts in behavioral neuroscience. Physiol Behav 2004, 81:179-209.
3. Berridge K.C., Robinson T.E., Aldridge J.W. Dissecting components of reward: 'Liking', 'wanting', and learning. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2009, 9:65-73.
4. Boakes R. Performance on learning to associate a stimulus with positive reinforcement. Operant-Pavlovian interactions 1977, 67-97. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. H. Davis, H. Hurwitz (Eds.).
5. Brown P.L., Jenkins H.M. Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck. J Exp Anal Behav 1968, 11:1-8.
6. Chang S.E., Wheeler D.S., Holland P.C. Effects of lesions of the amygdala central nucleus on autoshaped lever pressing. Brain Res 2012, 1450:49-56.
7. Chang S.E., Wheeler D.S., Holland P.C. Roles of nucleus accumbens and basolateral amygdala in autoshaped lever pressing. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2012, 97:441-451.
8. Davey G.C., Cleland G.G. Topography of signal-centered behavior in the rat - effects of deprivation state and reinforcer type. J Exp Anal Behav 1982, 38:291-304.
9. Davey G.C., Phillips S., Cleland G.G. The topography of signal-centered behaviour in the rats: the effects of solid and liquid food reinforcers. Behav Anal Lett 1981, 1:331-337.
10. Di Chiara G. Nucleus accumbens shell and core dopamine: differential role in behavior and addiction. Behav Brain Res 2002, 137:75-114.
11. Flagel S.B., Akil H., Robinson T.E. Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: implications for addiction. Neuropharmacology 2009, 56:139-148.
12. Flagel S.B., Cameron C.M., Pickup K.N., Watson S.J., Akil H., Robinson T.E. A food predictive cue must be attributed with incentive salience for it to induce c-fos mRNA expression in cortico-striatal-thalamic brain regions. Neuroscience 2011, 196:80-96.
13. Flagel S.B., Robinson T.E., Clark J.J., Clinton S.M., Watson S.J., Seeman P., Akil H., et al. An animal model of genetic vulnerability to behavioral disinhibition and responsiveness to reward-related cues: implications for addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010, 35:388-400.
14. Ikemoto S. Dopamine reward circuitry: two projection systems from the ventral midbrain to the nucleus accumbens-olfactory tubercle complex. Brain Res Rev 2007, 56:27-78.
15. Ikemoto S., Panksepp J. The role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in motivated behavior: a unifying interpretation with special reference to reward-seeking. Brain Res Rev 1999, 31:6-41.
16. Jenkins H.M., Moore B.R. Form of auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav 1973, 20:163-181.
17. Mahler S.V., Berridge K.C. Which cue to want? Central amygdala opioid activation enhances and focuses incentive salience on a prepotent reward cue. J Neurosci 2009, 29:6500-6513.
18. Mahler S.V., Smith K.S., Berridge K.C. Endocannabinoid hedonic hotspot for sensory pleasure: anandamide in nucleus accumbens shell enhances 'liking' of a sweet reward. Neuropsychopharmacology 2007, 32:2267-2278.
19. Parkinson J.A., Robbins T.W., Everitt B.J. Dissociable roles of the central and basolateral amygdala in appetitive emotional learning. Eur J Neurosci 2000, 12:405-413.
20. Parkinson J.A., Willoughby P.J., Robbins T.W., Everitt B.J. Disconnection of the anterior cingulate cortex and nucleus accumbens core impairs Pavlovian approach behavior: further evidence for limbic cortical-ventral striatopallidal systems. Behav. Neurosci 2000, 114:42-63.
21. Paxinos G., Watson C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates 1998, Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 4th ed.
22. Pecina S., Berridge K.C. Hedonic hot spot in nucleus accumbens shell: where do mu-opioids cause increased hedonic impact of sweetness. J Neurosci 2005, 25:11777-11786.
23. Pecina S., Smith K.S. Hedonic and motivational roles of opioids in food reward: implications for overeating disorders. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2010, 97:34-46.
24. Robinson T.E., Berridge K.C. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev 1993, 18:247-291.
25. Robinson T.E., Berridge K.C. Addiction. Annu Rev Psychol 2003, 54:25-53.
26. Robinson T.E., Flagel S.B. Dissociating the predictive and incentive motivational properties of reward-related cues through the study of individual differences. Biol Psychiatry 2009, 65:869-873.
27. Saunders B.T., Robinson T.E. The role of dopamine in the accumbens core in the expression of Pavlovian-conditioned responses. Eur J Neurosci 2012, 36:2521-2532.
28. Saunders B.T., Yager L.M., Robinson T.E. Preclinical studies shed light on individual variation in addiction vulnerability. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013, 38:249-250.
29. Shiflett M.W., Balleine B.W. At the limbic-motor interface: disconnection of basolateral amygdala from nucleus accumbens core and shell reveals dissociable components of incentive motivation. Eur J Neurosci 2010, 32:1735-1743.
30. Timberlake W., Grant D.L. Auto-shaping in rats to the presentation of another rat predicting food. Science 1975, 190:690-692.
31. Tomie A. Locating reward cue at response manipulandum (CAM) induces symptoms of drug abuse. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1996, 20:505-535.
32. Tomie A., Grimes K.L., Pohorecky L.A. Behavioral characteristics and neurobiological substrates shared by Pavlovian sign-tracking and drug abuse. Brain Res Rev 2008, 58:121-135.
33. van Dongen Y.C., Deniau J.M., Pennartz C.M., Galis-de Graaf Y., Voorn P., Thierry A.M., et al. Anatomical evidence for direction connections between the shell and core subregions of the rat nucleus accumbens. Neuroscience 2005, 136:1049-1071.