MRI hemodynamic markers of progressive bicuspid aortic valve-related aortic disease

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 140-145

  Hope, Michael D ^a   Sigovan, Monica ^a   Wrenn, S Jarrett ^a   Saloner, David ^a   Dyverfeldt, Petter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

aorta; BAV; eccentric jets; MRI; valves

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AORTA FLOW; ARTICLE; ASCENDING AORTA; BICUSPID AORTIC VALVE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIAC IMAGING; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; FLOW DISPLACEMENT; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PEAK VELOCITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SHEAR STRESS; TRICUSPID VALVE DISEASE; AORTA VALVE; DISEASE COURSE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE; YOUNG ADULT;

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ADULT; AORTIC VALVE; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84902374027     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24362     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Robicsek F, Thubrikar MJ, Cook JW, Fowler B,. The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: how does it function? Why does it fail? Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 177-185.
2. Hope MD, Meadows AK, Hope TA, et al. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Evaluation of bicuspid aortic valve and aortic coarctation with 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2008; 117: 2818-2819.
3. Hope MD, Hope TA, Meadows AK, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve: four-dimensional MR evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns. Radiology 2010; 255: 53-61.
4. den Reijer PM, Sallee D III, van der Velden P, et al. Hemodynamic predictors of aortic dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve by velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010; 12: 4.
5. Hope MD, Hope TA, Crook SE, et al. 4D flow CMR in assessment of valve-related ascending aortic disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 4: 781-787.
6. Barker AJ, Markl M, Burk J, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve is associated with altered wall shear stress in the ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 5: 457-466.
7. Bauer M, Gliech V, Siniawski H, Hetzer R,. Configuration of the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve disease undergoing aortic valve replacement with or without reduction aortoplasty. J Heart Valve Dis 2006; 15: 594-600.
8. Cotrufo M, Della Corte A,. The association of bicuspid aortic valve disease with asymmetric dilatation of the tubular ascending aorta: identification of a definite syndrome. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2009; 10: 291-297.
9. Lu MT, Thadani SR, Hope MD,. Quantitative assessment of asymmetric aortic dilation with valve-related aortic disease. Acad Radiol 2013; 20: 10-15.
10. Della Corte A, Bancone C, Conti CA, et al. Restricted cusp motion in right-left type of bicuspid aortic valves: a new risk marker for aortopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 144: 360-399, 369.e1.
11. Hope MD, Wrenn SJ, Sigovan M, Foster E, Tseng E, Saloner D,. Imaging biomarkers of aortic disease: increased growth rates with eccentric systolic flow. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 356-357.
12. Sigovan M, Hope MD, Dyverfeldt P, Saloner D,. Comparison of four-dimensional flow parameters for quantification of flow eccentricity in the ascending aorta. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 34: 1226-1230.
13. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S,. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 1999; 282: 2035-2042.
14. Slager CJ, Wentzel JJ, Gijsen FJ, et al. The role of shear stress in the destabilization of vulnerable plaques and related therapeutic implications. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2005; 2: 456-464.
15. Markl M, Chan FP, Alley MT, et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 17: 499-506.
16. Walker PG, Cranney GB, Scheidegger MB, Waseleski G, Pohost GM, Yoganathan AP,. Semiautomated method for noise reduction and background phase error correction in MR phase velocity data. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3: 521-530.
17. Bernstein MA, Zhou XJ, Polzin JA, et al. Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: analysis and correction. Magn Reson Med 1998; 39: 300-308.
18. Markl M, Bammer R, Alley MT, et al. Generalized reconstruction of phase contrast MRI: analysis and correction of the effect of gradient field distortions. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 791-801.
19. Lotz J, Meier C, Leppert A, Galanski M,. Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: basic facts and implementation. Radiographics 2002; 22: 651-671.
20. Stalder AF, Russe MF, Frydrychowicz A, Bock J, Hennig J, Markl M,. Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60: 1218-1231.
21. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2006; 114: e84-e231.
22. Markl M, Wallis W, Harloff A,. Reproducibility of flow and wall shear stress analysis using flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 33: 988-994.
23. Fry DL,. Certain histological and chemical responses of the vascular interface to acutely induced mechanical stress in the aorta of the dog. Circ Res 1969; 24: 93-108.
24. Dolan JM, Meng H, Singh S, Paluch R, Kolega J,. High fluid shear stress and spatial shear stress gradients affect endothelial proliferation, survival, and alignment. Ann Biomed Eng 2011; 39: 1620-1631.
25. Masaryk AM, Frayne R, Unal O, Krupinski E, Strother CM,. In vitro and in vivo comparison of three MR measurement methods for calculating vascular shear stress in the internal carotid artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 237-245.
26. Wentzel JJ, Corti R, Fayad ZA, et al. Does shear stress modulate both plaque progression and regression in the thoracic aorta? Human study using serial magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 846-854.
27. Petersson S, Dyverfeldt P, Ebbers T,. Assessment of the accuracy of MRI wall shear stress estimation using numerical simulations. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 36: 128-138.
28. Tadros TM, Klein MD, Shapira OM,. Ascending aortic dilatation associated with bicuspid aortic valve: pathophysiology, molecular biology, and clinical implications. Circulation 2009; 119: 880-890.
29. Nistri S, Sorbo MD, Marin M, Palisi M, Scognamiglio R, Thiene G,. Aortic root dilatation in young men with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valves. Heart 1999; 82: 19-22.
30. Thanassoulis G, Yip JW, Filion K, et al. Retrospective study to identify predictors of the presence and rapid progression of aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2008; 5: 821-828.
31. Bissell MM, Hess AT, Biasiolli L, et al. Aortic dilation in bicuspid aortic valve disease: flow pattern is a major contributor and differs with valve fusion type. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 6: 499-507.
32. Hope MD, Dyverfeldt P, Acevedo-Bolton G, et al. Post-stenotic dilation: evaluation of ascending aortic dilation with 4D flow MR imaging. Int J Cardiol 2012; 156: e40-e42.
33. Markl M, Mikati I, Carr J, McCarthy P, Malaisrie SC,. Three-dimensional blood flow alterations after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Circulation 2012; 125: e573-e575.
34. Clough RE, Waltham M, Giese D, Taylor PR, Schaeffter T,. A new imaging method for assessment of aortic dissection using four-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55: 914-923.