Quantitative Assessment of Asymmetric Aortic Dilation with Valve-related Aortic Disease

Academic Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 10-15

  Lu, Michael T ^a   Thadani, Samir R ^a,b   Hope, Michael D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Aorta; Aortic morphology; Aortic stenosis; Dilation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA DISEASE; AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE DISEASE; ARTICLE; ASCENDING AORTA; ASSYMETRIC ASCENDING AORTA DILATION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MITRAL VALVE STENOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; TRICUSPID VALVE STENOSIS;

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AORTA; AORTIC DISEASES; AORTIC VALVE; CONTRAST MEDIA; DILATATION, PATHOLOGIC; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TRICUSPID VALVE;

EID: 84870907010     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ward C. Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valve. Heart 2000, 83:81-85.
2. Tzemos N., Therrien J., Yip J., et al. Outcomes in adults with bicuspid aortic valves. JAMA 2008, 300:1317-1325.
3. Siddiqi H., Isselbacher E., Suzuki T., et al. Is size a good predictor of dissection risk in patients with Marfan syndrome or bicuspid aortic valves? Insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). J Am Coll Cardiol 2012, 59(suppl):E1883.
4. Elefteriades J.A. Thoracic aortic aneurysm: reading the enemy's playbook. Curr Probl Cardiol 2008, 33:203-277.
5. Keane M.G., Wiegers S.E., Plappert T., et al. Bicuspid aortic valves are associated with aortic dilatation out of proportion to coexistent valvular lesions. Circulation 2000, 102:III35-III39.
6. Hahn R.T., Roman M.J., Mogtader A.H., et al. Association of aortic dilation with regurgitant, stenotic and functionally normal bicuspid aortic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992, 19:283-288.
7. Bonderman D., Gharehbaghi-Schnell E., Wollenek G., et al. Mechanisms underlying aortic dilatation in congenital aortic valve malformation. Circulation 1999, 99:2138-2143.
8. Fedak P.W., Verma S., David T.E., et al. Clinical and pathophysiological implications of a bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation 2002, 106:900-904.
9. Niwa K., Perloff J.K., Bhuta S.M., et al. Structural abnormalities of great arterial walls in congenital heart disease: light and electron microscopic analyses. Circulation 2001, 103:393-400.
10. Cecconi M., Manfrin M., Moraca A., et al. Aortic dimensions in patients with bicuspid aortic valve without significant valve dysfunction. Am J Cardiol 2005, 95:292-294.
11. Kutty S., Kaul S., Danford C.J., et al. Main pulmonary artery dilation in association with congenital bicuspid aortic valve in the absence of pulmonary valve abnormality. Heart 2010, 96:1756-1761.
12. Biner S., Rafique A.M., Ray I., et al. Aortopathy is prevalent in relatives of bicuspid aortic valve patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 53:2288-2295.
13. Jackson V., Petrini J., Caidahl K., et al. Bicuspid aortic valve leaflet morphology in relation to aortic root morphology: a study of 300 patients undergoing open-heart surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surgery 2011, 40:e118-e124.
14. Fernandes S.M., Sanders S.P., Khairy P., et al. Morphology of bicuspid aortic valve in children and adolescents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 44:1648-1651.
15. Schaefer B.M., Lewin M.B., Stout K.K., et al. Usefulness of bicuspid aortic valve phenotype to predict elastic properties of the ascending aorta. Am J Cardiol 2007, 99:686-690.
16. Bauer M., Gliech V., Siniawski H., et al. Configuration of the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve disease undergoing aortic valve replacement with or without reduction aortoplasty. J Heart Valve Dis 2006, 15:594-600.
17. Cotrufo M., Della Corte A. The association of bicuspid aortic valve disease with asymmetric dilatation of the tubular ascending aorta: identification of a definite syndrome. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2009, 10:291-297.
18. Viscardi F., Vergara C., Antiga L., et al. Comparative finite element model analysis of ascending aortic flow in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve. Artif Organs 2010, 34:1114-1120.
19. Wigstrom L., Sjoqvist L., Wranne B. Temporally resolved 3D phase-contrast imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996, 36:800-803.
20. Hope M.D., Hope T.A., Meadows A.K., et al. Bicuspid aortic valve: four-dimensional MR evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns. Radiology 2010, 255:53-61.
21. Markl M., Draney M.T., Hope M.D., et al. Time-resolved 3-dimensional velocity mapping in the thoracic aorta: visualization of 3-directional blood flow patterns in healthy volunteers and patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004, 28:459-468.
22. den Reijer P.M., Sallee D., van der Velden P., et al. Hemodynamic predictors of aortic dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve by velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010, 12:4.
23. Hope M.D., Hope T.A., Crook S.E., et al. 4D flow CMR in assessment of valve-related ascending aortic disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011, 4:781-787.
24. Hope M.D., Wrenn J., Sigovan M., et al. Imaging biomarkers of aortic disease: increased growth rates with eccentric systolic flow. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012, 60:356-357.
25. Webb R.W., Higgins C.B. Thoracic Imaging 2005, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
26. Roman M.J., Devereux R.B., Kramer-Fox R., et al. Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults. Am J Cardiol 1989, 64:507-512.
27. Baumgartner H., Hung J., Bermejo J., et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009, 22:1-23.
28. Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol;55:e27-e129.
29. Bauer M., Siniawski H., Pasic M., et al. Different hemodynamic stress of the ascending aorta wall in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve. J Card Surg 2006, 21:218-220.
30. Della Corte A., Quarto C., Bancone C., et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of smooth muscle cell changes in ascending aortic dilatation with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve stenosis: focus on cell-matrix signaling. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008, 135:8-18.
31. Fry D.L. Certain histological and chemical responses of the vascular interface to acutely induced mechanical stress in the aorta of the dog. Circ Res 1969, 24:93-108.
32. Slager C.J., Wentzel J.J., Gijsen F.J., et al. The role of shear stress in the destabilization of vulnerable plaques and related therapeutic implications. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2005, 2:456-464.
33. Nistri S., Sorbo M.D., Marin M., et al. Aortic root dilatation in young men with normally functioning bicuspid aortic valves. Heart 1999, 82:19-22.
34. Thanassoulis G., Yip J.W., Filion K., et al. Retrospective study to identify predictors of the presence and rapid progression of aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2008, 5:821-828.