Comparison of four-dimensional flow parameters for quantification of flow eccentricity in the ascending aorta

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1226-1230

  Sigovan, Monica ^a   Hope, Michael D ^a   Dyverfeldt, Petter ^a   Saloner, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

4D flow; aorta; eccentric flow; flow angle; flow displacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASCENDING AORTA; BLOOD FLOW; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; THORACIC AORTA; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AORTA; AORTA, THORACIC; CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SYSTOLE;

EID: 80054730003     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22800     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Hope MD, Hope TA, Meadows AK, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve: four-dimensional MR evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns. Radiology 2010; 255: 53-61.
2. Hope MD, Hope TA, Crook SES, et al. Asymmetric elevation of aortic wall shear stress with bicuspid aortic valve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 4: 781-787.
3. den Reijer PM, Sallee D III, van der Velden P, et al. Hemodynamic predictors of aortic dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve by velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010; 12: 4.
4. Richards KE, Deserranno D, Donal E, Greenberg NL, Thomas JD, Garcia MJ,. Influence of structural geometry on the severity of bicuspid aortic stenosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2004; 287: H1410-H1416. (Pubitemid 39096691)
5. Wigström L, Sjöqvist L, Wranne B,. Temporally resolved 3D phase-contrast imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 800-803. (Pubitemid 26376721)
6. Markl M, Chan FP, Alley MT, et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 17: 499-506. (Pubitemid 36396955)
7. Bammer R, Hope TA, Aksoy M, Alley MT,. Time-resolved 3D quantitative flow MRI of the major intracranial vessels: initial experience and comparative evaluation at 1.5T and 3.0T in combination with parallel imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57: 127-140. (Pubitemid 46075031)
8. Bernstein MA, Zhou XJ, Polzin JA, et al. Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: analysis and correction. Magn Reson Med 1998; 39: 300-308. (Pubitemid 28099149)
9. Markl M, Bammer R, Alley MT, et al. Generalized reconstruction of phase contrast MRI: analysis and correction of the effect of gradient field distortions. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 791-801. (Pubitemid 37187845)
10. Walker PG, Cranney GB, Scheidegger MB, Waseleski G, Pohost GM, Yoganathan AP,. Semiautomated method for noise reduction and background phase error correction in MR phase velocity data. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3: 521-530.
11. Napel S, Lee DH, Frayne R, Rutt BK,. Visualizing three-dimensional flow with simulated streamlines and three-dimensional phase-contrast MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1992; 2: 143-153.
12. Anderson JD,. Computational fluid dynamics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1995.
13. Markl M, Draney MT, Hope MD, et al. Time-resolved 3-dimensional velocity mapping in the thoracic aorta: visualization of 3-directional blood flow patterns in healthy volunteers and patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28: 459-468. (Pubitemid 38988812)
14. Hope TA, Markl M, Wigström L, Alley MT, Miller DC, Herfkens RJ,. A comparison of flow patterns in patients with ascending aortic aneurysms and volunteers using four-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 26: 1471-1479. (Pubitemid 350291274)
15. Hope MD, Meadows AK, Hope TA, et al. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Evaluation of bicuspid aortic valve and aortic coarctation with 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2008; 117: 2818-2819. (Pubitemid 351770462)
16. Viscardi F, Vergara C, Antiga L, et al. Comparative finite element model analysis of ascending aortic flow in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve. Artif Organs 2010; 34: 1114-1120.
17. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S,. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 1999; 282: 2035-2042.
18. Slager CJ, Wentzel JJ, Gijsen FJ, et al. The role of shear stress in the destabilization of vulnerable plaques and related therapeutic implications. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2005; 2: 456-464. (Pubitemid 41226437)
19. Della Corte A, Quarto C, Bancone C, et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of smooth muscle cell changes in ascending aortic dilatation with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve stenosis: focus on cell-matrix signaling. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 135: 8-18.
20. Barker AJ, Lanning C, Shandas R,. Quantification of hemodynamic wall shear stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valve using phase-contrast MRI. Ann Biomed Eng 2010; 38: 788-800.
21. Laas J, Kleine P, Hasenkam MJ, Nygaard H,. Orientation of tilting disc and bileaflet aortic valve substitutes for optimal hemodynamics. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 1096-1099. (Pubitemid 29526905)
22. Stalder AF, Russe MF, Frydrychowicz A, Bock J, Hennig J, Markl M,. Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60: 1218-1231.