Predicting land-use change for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation and its effect on ecosystem services in a watershed in Japan

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 8, Issue , 2014, Pages 25-34

  Shoyama, Kikuko ^a   Yamagata, Yoshiki ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Japan)

Author keywords

Ecosystem service trade offs; Land use and cover change; Rural landscape; Scenario analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902158811     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bennett E.M., Balvanera P. The future of production systems in a globalized world. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2007, 5:191-198.
2. Bennett E.M., Peterson G.D., Gordon L.J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:1394-1404.
3. Boyd J., Banzhaf S. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63:616-626.
4. Cardinale B.J., Duffy J.E., Gonzalez A., Hooper D.U., Perrings C., Venail P., Narwani A., Mace G.M., Tilman D., Wardle D.A., Kinzig A.P., Daily G.C., Loreau M., Grace J.B., Larigauderie A., Srivastava D.S., Naeem S. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 2012, 486:59-67.
5. Castella J.C., Verburg P.H. Combination of process-oriented and pattern-oriented models of land-use change in a mountain area of Vietnam. Ecol. Modell. 2007, 202:410-420.
6. Daily G.C., Matson P.A. Ecosystem services: from theory to implementation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:9455-9456.
7. Estoque R.C., Murayama Y. Examining the potential impact of land use/cover changes on the ecosystem services of Baguio city, the Philippines: a scenario-based analysis. Appl. Geogr. 2012, 35:316-326.
8. Fisher B., Turner R.K., Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68:643-653.
9. Geneletti D. Assessing the impact of alternative land-use zoning policies on future ecosystem services. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2013, 40:25-35.
10. Goldstein J.H., Caldarone G., Duarte T.K., Ennaanay D., Hannahs N., Mendoza G., Polasky S., Wolny S., Daily G.C. Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2012, 109:7565-7570.
11. Japan Satoyama Satoumi Assessment (JSSA) Satoyama and Satoumi: Socio-ecological Production Landscapes in Japan - Experiences and Lessons from Hokkaido Cluster 2010, United Nations University, Tokyo.
12. Koyanagi T.F., Furukawa T. Nation-wide agrarian depopulation threatens semi-natural grassland species in Japan: Sub-national application of the Red List Index. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 167:1-8.
13. Kuriyama K. Environmental valuation of the landscape in Kushiro wetland. J. For. Econ. 1996, 129:45-50. (in Japanese).
14. Kuriyama K. Measuring the ecological value of the forests around the Kushiro Marsh: an empirical study of choice experiments. J. For. Res. 2000, 5:7-11.
15. Kushiro City, 2010. Research Report - The Role of Tourism for the Sustainable Development in the Kushiro. Kushiro city (in Japanese).
16. Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 2004, 304(5677):1623-1627.
17. Leh M.D.K., Matlock M.D., Cummings E.C., Nalley L.L. Quantifying and mapping multiple ecosystem services change in West Africa. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2013, 165:6-18.
18. Maestre Andres S., Calvet Mir L., van den Bergh J.C.J.M., Ring I., Verburg P.H. Ineffective biodiversity policy due to five rebound effects. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 1:101-110.
19. Nagendra H., Reyers B., Lavorel S. Impacts of land change on biodiversity: making the link to ecosystem services. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain 2013, 5:503-508.
20. Nelson E., Sander H., Hawthorne P., Conte M., Ennaanay D., Wolny S., Manson S., Polasky S. Projecting global land-use change and its effect on ecosystem service provision and biodiversity with simple models. PLoS One 2010, 5:e14327.
21. Pontius R.G., Shusas E., McEachern M. Detecting important categorical land changes while accounting for persistence. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2004, 101:251-268.
22. Pontius R.G., Boersma W., Castella J.C., Clarke K., Nijs T., Dietzel C., Duan Z., Fotsing E., Goldstein N., Kok K., Koomen E., Lippitt C., McConnell W., Mohd Sood A., Pijanowski B., Pithadia S., Sweeney S., Trung T., Veldkamp A.T., Verburg P.H. Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change. Ann. Reg. Sci. 2008, 42:11-37.
23. River Bureau of Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, 2006. Policy Report - Basic Policy for Kushiro River Development. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (in Japanese).
24. Ruijs A., Wossink A., Kortelainen M., Alkemade R., Schulp C.J.E. Trade-off analysis of ecosystem services in Eastern Europe. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 4:82-94.
25. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2009. Connecting Biodiversity and Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation: Report of the Second Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Biodiversity and Climate Change. Montreal, SCBD, Technical Series No. 41, pp. 126.
26. Shoyama K., Managi S., Yamagata Y. Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and climate-changemitigation: a choice experiment using ecosystem services indicators. Land Use Policy 2013, 34:282-293.
27. Swets J.A. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988, 240:1285-1293.
28. Tallis H., Goldman R., Uhl M., Brosi B. Integrating conservation and development in the field: implementing ecosystem service projects. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7:12-20.
29. Tallis, H.T., Ricketts, T., Guerry, A.D., Wood, S.A., Sharp, R., Nelson, E., Ennaanay, D., Wolny, S., Olwero, N., Vigerstol, K., Pennington, D., Mendoza, G., Aukema, J., Foster, J., Forrest, J., Cameron, D., Arkema, K., Lonsdorf, E., Kennedy, C., Verutes, G., Kim, C.K., Guannel, G., Papenfus, M., Toft, J., Marsik, M., Bernhardt, J., 2011. InVEST 2.4.5 User's Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford.
30. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature - A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB 2010, Progress Press, Malta.
31. Toda H., Shimizu T., Shimada J., Motobayashi T. Ecosystems and biomass systems. Research Approaches to Sustainable Biomass Systems 2014, 19-50. Academic Press, Boston. S. Tojo, T. Hirasawa (Eds.).
32. Trisurat Y., Alkemade R., Verburg P. Projecting land-use change and its consequences for biodiversity in northern Thailand. Environ. Manag. 2010, 45:626-639.
33. Verburg P., Overmars K. Combining top-down and bottom-up dynamics in land use modeling: exploring the future of abandoned farmlands in Europe with the Dyna-CLUE model. Landsc. Ecol. 2009, 24:1167-1181.
34. Verburg P., Veldkamp A. Projecting land use transitions at forest fringes in the Philippines at two spatial scales. Landsc. Ecol. 2004, 19:77-98.
35. Wallace K.J. Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biol. Conserv. 2007, 139:235-246.
36. Yoshida K. Visualization of non-use values in protected area. The Economics of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services 2013, 170-182. Showado Inc., Kyoto, (in Japanese). Yoshida (Ed.).