Trade-off analysis of ecosystem services in Eastern Europe

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 4, Issue , 2013, Pages 82-94

  Ruijs, A ^a   Wossink, A ^b   Kortelainen, M ^c   Alkemade, R ^a   Schulp, C J E ^d  

^a PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c Valtion taloudellinen tutkimuskeskus Finland   (Finland)

^d INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Carbon sequestration; Non parametric estimation; Opportunity costs; Production possibility frontiers

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879464454     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Alkemade R., Oorschot M.V., Miles L., Nellemann C., Bakkenes M., Brink B.T. GLOBIO3: a framework to investigate options for reducing global terrestrial biodiversity loss. Ecosystems 2009, 12:374-390.
2. Antle J., Capalbo S., Mooney S., Elliott E., Paustian K. Spatial heterogeneity, contract design, and the efficiency of carbon sequestration policies for agriculture. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2003, 46(2):231-250.
3. Barraquand F., Martinet V. Biological conservation in dynamic agricultural landscapes: effectiveness of public policies and trade-offs with agricultural production. Ecological Economics 2011, 70(5):910-920.
4. Bateman I.J. Bringing the real world into economic analyses of land use value: incorporating spatial complexity. Land Use Policy 2009, 26(Suppl. 1(0)):S30-S42.
5. Bateman I.J., Mace G.M., Fezzi C., Atkinson G., Turner K. Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environmental & Resource Economics 2011, 10.1007/s10640-010-9418-x.
6. Bellenger M.J., Herlihy A.T. Performance-based environmental index weights: are all metrics created equal?". Ecological Economics 2010, 69(5):1043-1050.
7. Bostian, M.B., A.T. Herlihy (2012). Shadow Pricing Wetland Function. Paper Presented at the EAERE 2012 Conference. Prague, Czech Republic.
8. 2006, PBL-Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven, The Netherands. A.F. Bouwman, T. Kram, K. Goldewijk (Eds.).
9. Boyd J., Banzhaf S. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics 2007, 63(2-3):616-626.
10. Brander L.M., Koetse M.J. The value of urban open space: meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results. Journal of Environmental Management 2011, 92(10):2763-2773.
11. Brink B.T., Esch S.V.D., Kram T., Oorschot M.V., Alkemade R., Ahrens R., Bakkenes M., Bakkes J., Berg M.V.D., Christensen V., Janse J., Jeuken M., Lucas P., Manders T., Meijl H.V., Stehfest E., Tabeau A., Vuuren D.V., Wilting H. Rethinking Global Biodiversity Strategies: Exploring Structural Changes in Production and Consumption to Reduce Biodiversity Loss 2010, PBL-Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven.
12. Brouwer, R., L. Brander, A. Wagtendonk (2012). Economic valuation of regulating services provided by wetlands in agricultural landscapes: a meta-analysis. In: TEEB-Conference. Leipzig.
13. Brown G., Patterson T., Cain N. The devil in the details: non-convexities in ecosystem service provision. Resource and Energy Economics 2011, 33(2):355-365.
14. Bryan B.A. Development and application of a model for robust, cost-effective investment in natural capital and ecosystem services. Biological Conservation 2010, 143(7):1737-1750.
15. Bryan B.A., King D., Ward J.R. Modelling and mapping agricultural opportunity costs to guide landscape planning for natural resource management. Ecological Indicators 2011, 11(1):199-208.
16. Cazals C., Florens J.P., Simar L. Nonparametric frontier estimation: a robust aproach. Journal of Econometrics 2002, 106:1-25.
17. Chavas J.P. On the productive value of biodiversity. Environmental & Resource Economics 2009, 42(1):109-131.
18. Costanza R., d'Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O'Neill R.V., Paruelo J., Raskin R.G., Sutton P., van den Belt M. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387:253-260.
19. Costanza R., d'Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O'Neill R.V., Paruelo J., Raskin R.G., Sutton P., van den Belt M. The value of ecosystem services: putting the issues in perspective. Ecological Economics 1998, 25(1):67-72.
20. Crossman N.D., Bryan B.A. Identifying cost-effective hotspots for restoring natural capital and enhancing landscape multifunctionality. Ecological Economics 2009, 68(3):654-668.
21. Daily G.C., Matson P.A. Ecosystem services: from theory to implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105(28):9455-9456.
22. Daily G.C., Polasky S., Goldstein J., Kareiva P.M., Mooney H.A., Pejchar L., Ricketts T.H., Salzman J., Shallenberger R. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2009, 7(1):21-28.
23. Daraio C., Simar L. Introducing environmental variables in nonparametric frontier models: a probabilistic approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2005, 24:93-121.
24. Daraio C., Simar L. Advanced Robust and Nonparametric Methods in Efficiency Analysis: Methodology and Applications 2007, Springer, New York.
25. Daraio C., Simar L. Conditional nonparametric frontier models for convex and nonconvex technologies: a unifying approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2007, 28:13-32.
26. Dasgupta P., Maler K.G. The economics of non-convex ecosystems: introduction. Environmental & Resource Economics 2003, 26(4):499-525.
27. Deprins D., Simar L., Tulkens H. Measuring labor inefficiency in post offices. The Performance of Public Enterprises: Concepts and Measurements 1984, 243-267. Amsterdam, North-Holland.
28. de Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 2010, 7(3):260-272.
29. De Witte, K., M. Kortelainen (2009). Blaming the Exogenous Environment? Conditional Effciency Estimation with Continuous and Discrete Exogenous Variables. MPRA Paper. Munich.
30. De Witte K., Marques R.C. Influential observations in frontier models, a robust non-oriented approach to the water sector. Annals of Operations Research 2010, 181:377-392.
31. Diaz-Balteiro L., Romero C. valuation of environmental goods: a shadow value perspective. Ecological Economics 2008, 64:517-520.
32. EC-JRC (2003). Global Land Cover 2000 Database, European Commission, Joint Research Centre.
33. Färe R., Grosskopf S. Theory and application of directional distance functions. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2000, 13(2):93-103.
34. Fenger H.J.M. Welfare regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: incorporating post-communist countries in a welfare regime typology. Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences 2007, 3:2.
35. Fisher B., Turner R.K., Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics 2009, 68(3):643-653.
36. Florens J.P., Simar L. Parametric approximations of nonparametric frontiers. Journal of Econometrics 2005, 124(1):91-116.
37. Ghermandi A., van den Bergh J., Brander L.M., de Groot H.L.F., Nunes P. Values of natural and human-made wetlands: a meta-analysis. Water Resources Research 2010, 46.
38. Haines-Young R. Land use and biodiversity relationships. Land Use Policy 2009, 26(Suppl. 1(0)):S178-S186.
39. Haines-Young R., Potschin M. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis 2010, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. D.G. Rafaelli (Ed.).
40. Hauer G., Cumming S., Schmiegelow F., Adamowicz W., Weber M., Jagodzinski R. Tradeoffs between forestry resource and conservation values under alternate policy regimes: a spatial analysis of the western Canadian boreal plains. Ecological Modelling 2010, 221(21):2590-2603.
41. Hof J., Flather C., Baltic T., King R. Forest and rangeland ecosystem condition indicators: identifying national areas of opportunity using data envelopment analysis. Forest Science 2004, 50(4):473-494.
42. Hughes G., Hare P. The international competitiveness of industries in Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Hungary and Poland. Oxford Economic Papers 1994, 46:200-221.
43. Hussain, S.S., L. Brander, A. McVittie, O. Vardakoulias, A. Wagtendonk, P. Verburg, R. Tinch, A. Fofana, C. Baulcomb, L. Mathieu (2011). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Quantitative Assessment-Final Report. Geneva, UNEP.
44. Isbell F., Calcagno V., Hector A., Connolly J., Harpole W.S., Reich P.B., Scherer-Lorenzen M., Schmid B., Tilman D., van Ruijven J., Weigelt A., Wilsey B.J., Zavaleta E.S., Loreau M. High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature 2011, 477(7363). 199-U196.
45. Keeler B.L., Polasky S., Brauman K.A., Johnson K.A., Finlay J.C., O'Neill A., Kovacs K., Dalzell B. Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2012, 109(45):18619-18624.
46. MacLeod M., Moran D., Eory V., Rees R.M., Barnes A., Topp C.F.E., Ball B., Hoad S., Wall E., McVittie A., Pajot G., Matthews R., Smith P., Moxey A. Developing greenhouse gas marginal abatement cost curves for agricultural emissions from crops and soils in the UK. Agricultural Systems 2010, 103(4):198-209.
47. Macpherson A.J., Principe P.P., Smith E.R. A directional distance function approach to regional environmental-economic assessments. Ecological Economics 2010, 69(10):1918-1925.
48. Maes J., Paracchini M.L., Zulian G., Dunbar M.B., Alkemade R. Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biological Conservation 2012, 155(0):1-12.
49. Martínez-Harms M.J., Balvanera P. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 2012, 8(1-2):17-25.
50. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends 2005, Island Press, Washington D.C.
51. Naidoo R., Balmford A., Costanza R., Fisher B., Green R.E., Lehner B., Malcolm T.R., Ricketts T.H. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105(28):9495-9500.
52. National Research Council Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-Making 2005, Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.
53. Nelson E., Mendoza G., Regetz J., Polasky S., Tallis H., Cameron D.R., Chan K.M.A., Daily G.C., Goldstein J., Kareiva P.M., Lonsdorf E., Naidoo R., Ricketts T.H., Shaw M.R. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2009, 7(1):4-11.
54. O'Donnell C.J., Coelli T.J. A Bayesian approach to imposing curvature on distance functions. Journal of Econometrics 2005, 126(2):493-523.
55. OECD OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050 2012, OECD, Paris.
56. PBL Roads from RIO+20. Den Haag 2012, PBL-Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Netherlands.
57. Polasky S., Nelson E., Camm J., Csuti B., Fackler P., Lonsdorf E., Montgomery C., White D., Arthur J., Garber-Yonts B., Haight R., Kagan J., Starfield A., Tobalske C. Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. Biological Conservation 2008, 141(6):1505-1524.
58. Raudsepp-Hearne C., Peterson G.D., Bennett E.M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010, 107(11):5242-5247.
59. Romstad E. The informational role of prices. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2008, 35(3):263-280.
60. Ruijs, A., M. Kortelainen, A. Wossink, C.J.E. Schulp, and R. Alkemade (2012). Performance Differences and Trade-Offs in the Provision of Ecosystem Goods and Services. PBL Working Papers 5. The Hague, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
61. Sauer J., Wossink G.A.A. Marketed outputs and non-marketed ecosystem services: the evaluation of marginal costs. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2013, 10.1093/erae/jbs040.
62. Schulp C.J.E., Alkemade R., Klein Goldewijk K., Petz K. Mapping ecosystem functions and services in Eastern Europe using global-scale data sets. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 2012, 8:156-168.
63. Schulp C.J.E., Nabuurs G.J., Verburg P.H. Future carbon sequestration in Europe-effects of land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 2008, 127:251-264.
64. Smith F.P., Gorddard R., House A.P.N., McIntyre S., Prober S.M. Biodiversity and agriculture: production frontiers as a framework for exploring trade-offs and evaluating policy. Environmental Science & Policy 2012, 23:85-94.
65. TEEB The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations 2010, Eartscan Publishers, London.
66. UK National Ecosystem Assessment (2011). The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the Key Findings, UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
67. UNEP (2012). GEO5: Environment for the Future we Want. Nairobi, Kenya, United Nations Environment Program.
68. US Environmental Protection Agency (2009). Valuing the Protection of Ecological Systems and Services. Washington, DC, EPA Sci. Advis. Board Rep.
69. Growing within Limits. A Report to the Global Assembly 2009 of the Club of Rome 2009, PBL-Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven. D. Van Vuuren, A. Faber (Eds.).
70. Wallace K.J. Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biological Conservation 2007, 139(3-4):235-246.
71. White C., Halpern B.S., Kappel C.V. Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2012, 109(12):4696-4701.