Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation: A choice experiment using ecosystem services indicators

Land Use Policy

Volumn 34, Issue , 2013, Pages 282-293

  Shoyama, Kikuko ^a   Managi, Shunsuke ^b   Yamagata, Yoshiki ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Japan)

^b TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Choice experiment; Ecosystem service trade off; Elicited choice probability; Indicator; Rural land use

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENDANGERED SPECIES; LAND MANAGEMENT; LAND USE; MITIGATION; PROBABILITY; RURAL AREA; WATERSHED;

HOKKAIDO; JAPAN; KUSHIRO;

EID: 84877333161     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Barkmann J., Glenk K., Keil A., Leemhuis C., Dietrich N., Gerold G., Marggraf R. Confronting unfamiliarity with ecosystem functions: the case for an ecosystem service approach to environmental valuation with stated preference methods. Ecological Economics 2008, 65:48-62.
2. Bateman I.J., Day B.H., Georgiou S., Lake I. The aggregation of environmental benefit values: welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP. Ecological Economics 2006, 60:450-460.
3. Bennett E.M., Balvanera P. The future of production systems in a globalized world. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2007, 5:191-198.
4. Bennett E.M., Peterson G.D., Gordon L.J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters 2009, 12:1394-1404.
5. Blass A.A., Lach S., Manski C.F. Using elicited choice probabilities to estimate random utility models: preferences for electricity reliability. International Economic Review 2010, 51:421-440.
6. Braimoh A.K., Agboola J.I., Subramanian S.M. The role of governance in managing ecosystem service trade-offs. IHDP Update Issue 2009, 3:22-25.
7. Butchart S.H.M., Walpole M., Collen B., van Strien A., Scharlemann J.P.W., Almond R.E.A., Baillie J.E.M., Bomhard B., Brown C., Bruno J., Carpenter K.E., Carr G.M., Chanson J., Chenery A.M., Csirke J., Davidson N.C., Dentener F., Foster M., Galli A., Galloway J.N., Genovesi P., Gregory R.D., Hockings M., Kapos V., Lamarque J.-F., Leverington F., Loh J., McGeoch M.A., McRae L., Minasyan A., Morcillo M.H., Oldfield T.E.E., Pauly D., Quader S., Revenga C., Sauer J.R., Skolnik B., Spear D., Stanwell-Smith D., Stuart S.N., Symes A., Tierney M., Tyrrell T.D., Vié J.-C., Watson R. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 2010, 328:1164-1168.
8. Christie M., Rayment M. An economic assessment of the ecosystem service benefits derived from the SSSI biodiversity conservation policy in England and Wales. Ecosystem Services 2012, 1:70-84.
9. Dachary-Bernard J., Rambonilaza T. Choice experiment, multiple programmes contingent valuation and landscape preferences: how can we support the land use decision making process?. Land Use Policy 2012, 29:846-854.
10. Glenk K. Using local knowledge to model asymmetric preference formation in willingness to pay for environmental services. Journal of Environmental Management 2011, 92:531-541.
11. Hanley N., Schläpfer F., Spurgeon J. Aggregating the benefits of environmental improvements: distance-decay functions for use and non-use values. Journal of Environmental Management 2003, 68:297-304.
12. Hauck J., Görg C., Varjopuro R., Ratamäki O., Jax K. Benefits and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making: some stakeholder perspectives. Environmental Science and Policy 2013, 25:13-21.
13. JSSA Satoyama and Satoumi: Socio-ecological Production Landscapes in Japan - Experiences and Lessons from Hokkaido Cluster 2010, Japan Satoyama Satoumi Assessment, United Nations University, Tokyo.
14. Kaffashi S., Shamsudin M.N., Radam A., Yacob M.R., Rahim K.A., Yazid M. Economic valuation and conservation: do people vote for better preservation of Shadegan International Wetland?. Biological Conservation 2012, 150:150-158.
15. Louviere J. Conjoint analysis. Advances in Marketing Research 1994, Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA. R. Bagozzi (Ed.).
16. Louviere J., Hensher D., Swait J. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application 2000, Cambridge University Press, London.
17. MacFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. Frontiers in Econometrics 1974, 105-142. Academic Press, New York. P. Zarembka (Ed.).
18. Manski C. Analysis of choice expectations in incomplete scenarios. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1999, 19:49-66.
19. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis 2005, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
20. Mitani Y., Shoji Y., Kuriyama K. Estimating economic values of vegetation restoration with choice experiments: a case study of an endangered species in Lake Kasumigaura, Japan. Landscape and Ecological Engineering 2008, 4:103-113.
21. Phelps J., Webb E.L., Adams W.M. Biodiversity co-benefits of policies to reduce forest-carbon emissions. Nature Climate Change 2012, 2:497-503.
22. Poppenborg P., Koellner T. Do attitudes toward ecosystem services determine agricultural land use practices? An analysis of farmers' decision-making in a South Korean watershed. Land Use Policy 2013, 31:422-429.
23. Prager K., Reed M., Scott A. Encouraging collaboration for the provision of ecosystem services at a landscape scale - rethinking agri-environmental payments. Land Use Policy 2012, 29:244-249.
24. Raudsepp-Hearne C., Peterson G.D., Bennett E.M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010, 107:5242-5247.
25. Rodríguez J.P., Beard T.D., Bennett E.M., Cumming G.S., Cork S., Agard J., Dobson A.P., Peterson G.D. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society 2006, 11:28.
26. SCBD, 2009. Connecting Biodiversity and Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation: Report of the Second Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Biodiversity and Climate Change. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Technical Series No. 41, p. 126.
27. Tallis H., Goldman R., Uhl M., Brosi B. Integrating conservation and development in the field: implementing ecosystem service projects. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2009, 7:12-20.
28. TEEB The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature. A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity 2010, Progress Press, Malta.
29. Train K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2003, Cambridge University Press, London.
30. Venter O., Laurance W.F., Iwamura T., Wilson K.A., Fuller R.A., Possingham H.P. Harnessing carbon payments to protect biodiversity. Science 2009, 326:1368.
31. Tsujii T., Umeda Y., Sakurada J., Shimizu M. Moorland Vegetation and Underground Water Level. Ecological Research Report in the Kushiro Wetland 1974, 36-105. Hokkaido University, (in Japanese).