Projecting land use transitions at forest fringes in the Philippines at two spatial scales

Landscape Ecology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 77-98

  Verburg, Peter H ^a   Veldkamp, A ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Deforestation; Land use change; Land use planning; Modeling; Philippines; Protected areas; Spatial indices

Indexed keywords

LAND USE CHANGE; LAND USE PLANNING; MODELING; SPATIAL RESOLUTION;

ASIA; EURASIA; PHILIPPINES; ROMBLON [(PRV) SOUTHERN TAGALOG]; SIBUYAN; SOUTHEAST ASIA; SOUTHERN TAGALOG; VISAYAS;

EID: 2142678074     PISSN: 09212973     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:LAND.0000018370.57457.58     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Angelsen A. and Kaimowitz D. 1999. Rethinking the causes of deforestation: Lessons from economic models. World Bank Research Observer 14: 73-98.
2. Baker W.L. and Cai Y. 1992. The r.le programs for multiscale analysis of landscape structure using the GRASS geographical information system. Landscape Ecology 57: 291-302.
3. Chomitz K.M. and Gray D.A. 1996. Roads, Land Use, and Deforestation: A spatial model applied to Belize. The World Bank Economic Review 10: 487-512.
4. Costanza R. and Ruth M. 1998. Using Dynamic Modeling to Scope Environmental Problems and Build Consensus. Environmental Management 22: 183-195.
5. Coxhead I. 2000. Consequences of a Food Security Strategy for Economic Welfare, Income Distribution and Land Degradation: The Philippine Case. World Development 28: 111-128.
6. Coxhead I., Rola A. and Kim K. 2001. How Do National Markets and Price Policies Affect Land Use at the Forest Margin? Evidence from the Philippines. Land Economics 77: 250-267.
7. Coxhead I., Shively G. and Shuai X. 2002. Development policies, resource constraints, and agricultural expansion on the Philippine land frontier. Environment and Development Economics 7: 341-363.
8. De Fries R.S., Hansen M.C. and Townshend J.R.G. 2000. Global continuous fileds of vegetation characteristics: a linear mixture model applied to multi-year 8km AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21: 1389-1414.
9. Dobson J.E., Bright E.A., Coleman P.R., Durfee R.C. and Worley B.A. 2000. Landscan: A Global Population Database for Estimating Population at Risk. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 66(7): 849-857.
10. Gardner R.H. 1998. Pattern, process, and the analysis of spatial scales. In: Peterson D.L. and Parker V.T. (eds), Ecological Scale: Theory and Applications. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA, pp. 17-34.
11. Garrity D.P., Kummer D.M. and Guiang E.S. 1993. The Philippines. In: National Research Council Committee on sustainable agriculture and the invironment in the humid tropics (ed.), Sustainable Agriculture and the environment in the Humid Tropics. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 549-624.
12. Geist H.J. and Lambin E.F. 2002. Proximate Causes and Underlying Driving Forces of Tropical Deforestation. Bioscience 52: 143-150.
13. Geoghegan J., Villar S.C., Klepeis P., Mendoza P.M., Ogneva-Himmelberger Y., Chowdhury R.R., Turner II B.L. and Vance C. 2001. Modeling Tropical Deforestation in the Southern Yucatan Peninsular Region: Comparing Survey and Satellite Data. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 85: 25-46.
14. Gustafson E.J. 1998. Quantifying Landscape Spatial Pattern: What Is the State of the Art? Ecosystems 1: 143-156.
15. Hargrove W.W., Gardner R.H., Turner M.G., Romme W.H. and Despain D.G. 2000. Simulating fire patterns in heterogeneous landscapes. Ecological Modelling 135: 243-263.
16. He H.S., DeZonia B.E. and Mladenoff D.J. 2000. An aggregation index (AI) to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes. Landscape Ecology 15: 591-601.
17. He H.S., Ventura S.J. and Mladenoff D.J. 2002. Effects of spatial aggregation approaches on classified satellite imagery. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 16: 93-109.
18. Kelly P.F. 1998. The politics of urban-rural relations: land use conversion in the Philipines. Environment and Urbanization 10: 35-54.
19. Lambin E.F. 1997. Modelling and monitoring land-cover change processes in tropical regions. Progress in Physical Geography 21: 375-393.
20. Lambin E.F., Turner II B.L., Geist H.J., Agbola S.B., Angelsen A., Bruce J.W., Coomes O., Dirzo R., Fischer G., Folke C., George P.S., Homewood K., Imbernon J., Leemans R., Li X.B., Moran E.F., Mortimore M., Ramakrishnan P.S., Richards J.F., Skanes H., Stone G.D., Svedin U., Veldkamp A., Vogel C. and Xu J.C. 2001. The Causes of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: Moving Beyond the Myths. Global Environmental Change 11: 261-269.
21. Liu D.S., Iverson L.R. and Brown S. 1993. Rates and patterns of deforestation in the Philippines: application of geographic information system analysis. Forest Ecology and Management 57: 1-16.
22. McMorrow J. and Talip M.A. 2001. Decline of forest area in Sabah, Malaysia: Relationship to state policies, land code and land capability. Global Environmental Change 11: 217-230.
23. Menon S., Pontius R.G., Rose J., Khan M.L. and Bawa K.S. 2000. Identifying Convservation-Priority Areas in the Tropics: a Land-Use Change Modeling Approach. Conservation Biology 15: 501-512.
24. Mladenoff D.J. and Baker W.L. 1999. Spatial modeling of forest landscape change: approaches and application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
25. Mladenoff D.J. and DeZonia B.E. 2002. APACK 2.22 users's guide. Madison, WI, USA, Department of Forest Ecology and Management, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
26. Nelson G.C., Harris V. and Stone S.W. 2001. Deforestation, Land Use, and Property Rights: Empirical Evidence from Darien, Panama. Land Economics 77: 187-205.
27. Nelson G.C. and Hellerstein D. 1997. Do Roads Cause Deforestation? Using Satellite Images in Econometric Analysis of Land Use. Agricultural Economics 79: 80-88.
28. Ojima D.S., Galvin K.A. and Turner II B.L. 1994. The global impact of land-use change. Bioscience 44: 300-304.
29. O'Neill R.V., Turner S.J., Cullinan V.I., Coffin D.P, Cook T., Conley W., Brunt J., Thomas J.M., Conley M.R. and Gosz J. 1991. Multiple landscape scales: an intersite comparison. Landscape Ecology 5: 137-144.
30. Peterson G.D. 2002. Contagious Disturbance, Ecological Memory, and the Emergence of Landscape Pattern. Ecosystems 5: 329-338.
31. Portela R. and Rademacher I. 2001. A dynamic model of patterns of deforestation and their effect on the ability of the Brazilian Amazonia to provide ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling 143: 115-146.
32. Rambaldi G. and Callosa-Tarr J. 2000. National Integrated Protected Areas Programme. European Commission, DENR. Essentials of Protected Area Management. 7. Manual on Participatory 3-D Modeling for Natural Resource Management. Quezon City, Philippines.
33. Rambaldi G., Mendoza M. and Ramirez F. 2000. Adding the fourth dimension to Participatory 3-D Modelling. PLA Notes 39: 19-24.
34. Riiters K., Wickham J., O'Neill R.V., Jones B. and Smith E., 2000. Global-Scale Patterns of Forest Fragmentation. Conservation Ecology, 4: 3. URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss2/art3.
35. Ripple W.J., Bradshaw G.A. and Spies T.A. 1991. Measuring landscape pattern in the Cascade Range of Oregon, USA. Biological Conservation 57: 73-88.
36. Schoorl J.M. and Veldkamp A. 2001. Linking land use and landscape process modelling: a case study for the Alora region (South Spain). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 85: 281-292.
37. Shively G. 2001. Agriculutral Change, Rural Labor Markets, and Forest Clearing: An illustrative Cae form the Philippines. Land Economics 77: 268-284.
38. Swets J.A. 1986. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, June: 1285-1293.
39. Tischendorf L. 2001. Can landscape indices predict ecological processis consistently? Landscape Ecology 16: 235-254.
40. Tucker C.J. and Townshend J.R.G. 2000. Strategies for monitoring tropical deforestation using satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21: 1461-1471.
41. Turner M.G. 1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 171-198.
42. USGS 1996. GTOPO30: global digital elevation model (DEM) at 30 arc seconds. United States Geological Survey, Washington, DC, USA.
43. Van den Top G.M. 1998. The social dynamics of deforestation in the Sierra Madre. NIAS press, Copenhagen, Denmark.
44. Van Rompaey A.J.J., Govers G. and Puttemans C. 2002. Modelling land use changes and their impact on soil erosion and sediment supply to rivers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 27: 481-484.
45. Velasco E., Miclat A., Garana J., Lucas-Fernan M.L., Ladra W.F., Blastique T., Velarde A., Torres M.J.A., Sespene P., Casilin A.C., Ronion D. and Rambaldi G. 2000. Socio-economic and Cultural Profile of the Island of Sibuyan, Romblon. Findings and Recommendations for PA Planning resulting from a Rapid Rural Appraisal conducted within the communities of Barangays Taclobo, Tampayan and Lumang Weste. National Integrated Protected Area Programme (NIPAP), Manilla, Philippines.
46. Veldkamp A. and Fresco L.O. 1996. CLUE-CR: an integrated multi-scale model to simulate land use change scenarios in Costa Rica. Ecological Modelling 91: 231-248.
47. Veldkamp A. and Lambin E.F. 2001. Editorial: Predicting land-use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 85: 1-6.
48. Verburg P.H., de Koning G.H.J., Kok K., Veldkamp A. and Bouma J. 1999. A spatial explicit allocation procedure for modelling the pattern of land use change based upon actual land use. Ecological Modelling 116: 45-61.
49. Verburg P.H., Schot P., Dijst M. and Veldkamp A. 2003a. Land-Use Change Modelling: Current Practice and Research Priorities. Geojournal, in press.
50. Verburg P.H., Soepboer W., Limpiada R., Espaldon M.V.O. and Sharifa M. 2002b. Land use change modelling at the regional scale: the CLUE-s model. Environmental Management 30: 391-405.
51. Verburg P.H., Veldkamp A., Engelsman W., van Zalinge R., van Mensvoort M.E.F. and Overmars K. 2003. The use of models to assess the impact of land use change on ecological processes: case-studies of deforestation in SE Asia. In: Gerold G., Fremerey M. and Guhardja E. (eds), Land use, nature conservation, and the stability of rainforest margins in Southeast Asia. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
52. Walpole P. 1999. Decline of the Philippines Forest (map and book). Enviornmental Science for Social Change (ESSC), Quezon City, Philippines.
53. Wear D.N., Turner M.G. and Naiman R.J. 1998. Land cover along an urban-rural gradient: implications for water quality. Ecological Applications 8: 619-630.
54. White D., Minotti P.G., Barczak M.J., Sifneos J.C., Freemark K.E., Santelmann M.V., Steinitz C.F., Kiester A.R. and Preston E.M. 1997. Assessing Risks to Biodiversity from Future Landscape Change. Conservation Biology 11: 349-360.
55. Wollenberg E., Edmunds D. and Buck L. 2000. Using scenarios to make decisions about the future: anticipatory learning for the adaptive co-management of community forests. Landscape and Urban Planning 47: 65-77.
56. Wu J., Shen W., Sun W. and Tueller P.T. 2002. Emperical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landscape Ecology 17: 761-782.