Cognitive spare capacity and speech communication: A narrative overview

BioMed Research International

Volumn 2014, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Rudner, Mary ^a   Lunner, Thomas ^a,b,c  

^a Linköping University   (Sweden)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c OTICON A S   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGING; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; NOISE; REVIEW; SPEECH; WORKING MEMORY; PHYSIOLOGY; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

COGNITION; HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; SPEECH;

EID: 84902124382     PISSN: 23146133     EISSN: 23146141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2014/869726     Document Type: Review

References (123)

1. Kiessling J., Pichora-Fuller M. K., Gatehouse S., Stephens D., Arlinger S., Chisolm T., Davis A. C., Erber N. P., Hickson L., Holmes A., Rosenhall U., Von Wedel H., Candidature for and delivery of audiological services: special needs of older people. International Journal of Audiology 2003 42 supplement 2 S92 S2101 2-s2.0-0642312525
2. Pichora-Fuller M. K., Singh G., Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation. Trends in Amplification 2006 10 1 29 59 2-s2.0-33745010448 10.1177/ 108471380601000103 (Pubitemid 44257141)
3. Peelle J. E., The hemispheric lateralization of speech processing depends on what "speech" is: a hierarchical perspective. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2012 6, article 309 2-s2.0-84870960891 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00309
4. Scott S. K., Johnsrude I. S., The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception. Trends in Neurosciences 2003 26 2 100 107 2-s2.0-0037303502 10.1016/S0166-2236(02)00037-1 (Pubitemid 36110544)
5. Kaas J. H., Hackett T. A., Subdivisions of auditory cortex and processing streams in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2000 97 22 11793 11799 2-s2.0-0034710908 10.1073/pnas.97.22.11793
6. Rauschecker J. P., Scott S. K., Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nature Neuroscience 2009 12 6 718 724 2-s2.0-66749097136 10.1038/nn.2331
7. Hickok G., Poeppel D., The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2007 8 5 393 402 2-s2.0-34247487053 10.1038/nrn2113 (Pubitemid 46652465)
8. Friederici A. D., Gierhan S. M., The language network. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2013 23 2 250 254 2-s2.0-84875849011 10.1016/j.conb.2012.10.002
9. Davis A., Britain G., Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models. 2007 National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment, University of Southampton
10. Davis A., Davis K. A., Hickson L., Epidemiology of aging and hearing loss related to other chronic illnesses. Proceedings of the 2nd International Adult Conference Hearing Care for Adults-The Challenge of Aging 2009 Chicago, Ill, USA 23 32
11. Gordon-Salant S., Hearing loss and aging: new research findings and clinical implications. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 2005 42 4 9 24 2-s2.0-33244454974 10.1682/JRRD.2005.01.0006 (Pubitemid 43276898)
12. Nachtegaal J., Festen J. M., Kramer S. E., Hearing ability in working life and its relationship with sick leave and self-reported work productivity. Ear and Hearing 2012 33 1 94 103 2-s2.0-84855249064 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318228033e
13. Pierre P. V., Fridberger A., Wikman A., Alexanderson K., Self-reported hearing difficulties, main income sources, and socio-economic status; a cross-sectional population-based study in Sweden. BMC Public Health 2012 12 1, article 874 2-s2.0-84871802434 10.1186/1471-2458-12-874
14. Pronk M., Deeg D. J., Kramer S. E., Hearing status in older persons: a significant determinant of depression and loneliness? Results from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. American Journal of Audiology 2013 22 2 316 320
15. Ng E. H. N., Rudner M., Lunner T., Rönnberg J., Relationships between self-report and cognitive measures of hearing aid outcome. Speech, Language and Hearing 2013 16 4 197 207
16. Zekveld A. A., George E. L., Houtgast T., Kramer S. E., Cognitive abilities relate to self-reported hearing disability. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2013 56 5 1364 1372
17. Eckert M. A., Cute S. L., Vaden K. I. Jr., Kuchinsky S. E., Dubno J. R., Auditory cortex signs of age-related hearing loss. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2012 13 5 703 713 2-s2.0-84870454971 10.1007/s10162-012-0332-5
18. Peelle J. E., Troiani V., Grossman M., Wingfield A., Hearing loss in older adults affects neural systems supporting speech comprehension. The Journal of Neuroscience 2011 31 35 12638 12643 2-s2.0-80052350924 10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 2559-11.2011
19. Stenfelt S., Rönnberg J., The Signal-Cognition interface: interactions between degraded auditory signals and cognitive processes. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2009 50 5 385 393 2-s2.0-70349307493 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00748.x
20. Sörqvist P., Stenfelt S., Rönnberg J., Working memory capacity and visual-verbal cognitive load modulate auditory-sensory gating in the brainstem: toward a unified view of attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2012 24 11 2147 2154 2-s2.0-84874503828
21. Srinivasan S., Keil A., Stratis K., Woodruff Carr K. L., Smith D. W., Effects of cross-modal selective attention on the sensory periphery: cochlear sensitivity is altered by selective attention. Neuroscience 2012 223 325 332 2-s2.0-84866502724 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.07.062
22. Lunner T., Rudner M., Rönnberg J., Cognition and hearing aids. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2009 50 5 395 403 2-s2.0-70349331679 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00742.x
23. Plomp R., Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1978 63 2 533 549 2-s2.0-0017929575 (Pubitemid 8327751)
24. Edwards B., The future of hearing aid technology. Trends in Amplification 2007 11 1 31 45 2-s2.0-33846993413 10.1177/1084713806298004
25. Moore B. C. J., Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids. Ear and Hearing 1996 17 2 133 161 2-s2.0-0029923147 (Pubitemid 126441205)
26. Dillon H., Hearing Aids 2012 2nd Turramurra, Australia Boomerang Press
27. Wang D., Kjems U., Pedersen M. S., Boldt J. B., Lunner T., Speech perception of noise with binary gains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2008 124 4 2303 2307 2-s2.0-53949095896 10.1121/1.2967865
28. Jenstad L. M., Souza P. E., Quantifying the effect of compression hearing aid release time on speech acoustics and intelligibility. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2005 48 3 651 667 2-s2.0-24944474237 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/045) (Pubitemid 41330651)
29. Bor S., Souza P., Wright R., Multichannel compression: effects of reduced spectral contrast on vowel identification. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2008 51 5 1315 1327 2-s2.0-52949153530 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/ 07-0009)
30. Rudner M., Rönnberg J., Lunner T., Working memory supports listening in noise for persons with hearing impairment. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2011 22 3 156 167 2-s2.0-79955684084
31. Mattys S. L., Davis M. H., Bradlow A. R., Scott S. K., Speech recognition in adverse conditions: a review. Language and Cognitive Processes 2012 27 7-8 953 978 2-s2.0-84863812024 10.1080/01690965.2012.705006
32. Scott S. K., McGettigan C., The neural processing of masked speech. Hearing Research 2013 303 58 66 2-s2.0-84880598835 10.1016/j.heares.2013.05.001
33. Zion Golumbic E. M., Ding N., Bickel S., Lakatos P., Schevon C. A., McKhann G. M., Goodman R. R., Emerson R., Mehta A. D., Simon J. Z., Poeppel D., Schroeder C. E., Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a 'cocktail party'. Neuron 2013 77 5 980 991 2-s2.0-84876443182 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.037
34. Lee A. K. C., Rajaram S., Xia J., Bharadwaj H., Larson E., Hämäläinen M. S., Shinn-Cunningham B. G., Auditory selective attention reveals preparatory activity in different cortical regions for selection based on source location and source pitch. Frontiers in Neuroscience 2013 6, article 190 2-s2.0-84875288963 10.3389/fnins.2012.00190
35. Reuter-Lorenz P. A., Cappell K. A., Neurocognitive aging and the compensation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2008 17 3 177 182 2-s2.0-45349102064 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00570.x
36. Wong P. C. M., Jin J. X., Gunasekera G. M., Abel R., Lee E. R., Dhar S., Aging and cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise. Neuropsychologia 2009 47 3 693 703 2-s2.0-59749096586 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.032
37. Duquesnoy A. J., Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1983 74 3 739 743 2-s2.0-0020816074 (Pubitemid 13019046)
38. Festen J. M., Plomp R., Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1990 88 4 1725 1736 2-s2.0-0025259936 10.1121/1.400247
39. George E. L. J., Zekveld A. A., Kramer S. E., Goverts S. T., Festen J. M., Houtgast T., Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2007 121 4 2362 2375 2-s2.0-34147167112 10.1121/1.2642072 (Pubitemid 46553051)
40. Lorenzi C., Gilbert G., Carn H., Garnier S., Moore B. C. J., Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006 103 49 18866 18869 2-s2.0-33845495121 10.1073/pnas.0607364103 (Pubitemid 44913501)
41. Rönnberg J., Lunner T., Zekveld A., Sörqvist P., Danielsson H., Lyxell B., Dahlström Ö., Signoret C., Stenfelt S., Pichora-Fuller M. K., Rudner M., The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theory, data, and clinical implications. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 2013 7, article 31 2-s2.0-84879723009 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031
42. Sörqvist P., The role of working memory capacity in auditory distraction: a review. Noise and Health 2010 12 49 217 224 2-s2.0-77957576113 10.4103/1463-1741.70500
43. Baddeley A. D., Hitch G., Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation-Advances in Research and Theory 1974 8 47 89 2-s2.0-77956965422 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1
44. Cabeza R., Nyberg L., Imaging cognition II: an empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000 12 1 1 47 2-s2.0-0034054982 (Pubitemid 30142782)
45. Smith E. E., Jonides J., Working memory: a view from neuroimaging. Cognitive Psychology 1997 33 1 5 42 2-s2.0-0031156047 (Pubitemid 127384736)
46. Barch D. M., Braver T. S., Nystrom L. E., Forman S. D., Noll D. C., Cohen J. D., Dissociating working memory from task difficulty in human prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia 1997 35 10 1373 1380 2-s2.0-0030668529 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00072-9 (Pubitemid 27455564)
47. Braver T. S., Cohen J. D., Nystrom L. E., Jonides J., Smith E. E., Noll D. C., A parametric study of prefrontal cortex involvement in human working memory. NeuroImage 1997 5 1 49 62 2-s2.0-0030830595 10.1006/nimg.1996.0247 (Pubitemid 27481303)
48. Miyake A., Shah P., Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control 1999 Cambridge University Press
49. Baddeley A., The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000 4 11 417 423 2-s2.0-0034333066 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
50. Rönnberg J., Cognition in the hearing impaired and deaf as a bridge between signal and dialogue: a framework and a model. International Journal of Audiology 2003 42 supplement 1 S68 S76 2-s2.0-0642343308 (Pubitemid 41626012)
51. Prabhakaran V., Narayanan K., Zhao Z., Gabriel J. D. E., Integration of diverse information in working memory within the frontal lobe. Nature Neuroscience 2000 3 1 85 90 2-s2.0-0033993991 10.1038/71156 (Pubitemid 30126353)
52. Allen R. J., Baddeley A. D., Hitch G. J., Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006 135 2 298 313 2-s2.0-33745074666 10.1037/0096-3445.135. 2.298 (Pubitemid 43883047)
53. Rudner M., Fransson P., Ingvar M., Nyberg L., Rönnberg J., Neural representation of binding lexical signs and words in the episodic buffer of working memory. Neuropsychologia 2007 45 10 2258 2276 2-s2.0-34247850871 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.017 (Pubitemid 46695740)
54. Rudner M., Rönnberg J., The role of the episodic buffer in working memory for language processing. Cognitive Processing 2008 9 1 19 28 2-s2.0-39849083327 10.1007/s10339-007-0183-x (Pubitemid 351317118)
55. Just M. A., Carpenter P. A., A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 1992 99 1 122 149 2-s2.0-0026451760
56. Daneman M., Carpenter P. A., Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1983 9 4 561 584 2-s2.0-0002379360 10.1037/0278-7393.9.4.561
57. Daneman M., Carpenter P. A., Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1980 19 4 450 466 2-s2.0-0001515739
58. Miyake A., Friedman N. P., Emerson M. J., Witzki A. H., Howerter A., Wager T. D., The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology 2000 41 1 49 100 2-s2.0-0034242442 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
59. Rudner M., Ng H. N., Rönnberg N., Mishra S., Rönnberg J., Lunner T., Stenfelt: S., Cognitive spare capacity as a measure of listening effort. Journal of Hearing Science 2011 1 2 47 49
60. Fletcher P. C., Henson R. N. A., Frontal lobes and human memory insights from functional neuroimaging. Brain 2001 124 5 849 881 2-s2.0-0034998172 (Pubitemid 32458500)
61. Rudner M., Lunner T., Behrens T., Thorén E. S., Rönnberg J., Working memory capacity may influence perceived effort during aided speech recognition in noise. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2012 23 8 577 589 2-s2.0-84866453661 10.3766/jaaa.23.7.7
62. Zekveld A. A., Kramer S. E., Festen J. M., Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response. Ear and Hearing 2011 32 4 498 510 2-s2.0-79959845719 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820512bb
63. Wild C. J., Yusuf A., Wilson D. E., Peelle J. E., Davis M. H., Johnsrude I. S., Effortful listening: the processing of degraded speech depends critically on attention. The Journal of Neuroscience 2012 32 40 14010 14021 2-s2.0-84866981622 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1528-12.2012
64. Lunner T., Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use. International Journal of Audiology 2003 42 supplement 1 S49 S58 2-s2.0-0642282104 (Pubitemid 41626010)
65. Akeroyd M. A., Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults. International Journal of Audiology 2008 47 supplement 2 S53 S71 2-s2.0-56549098668 10.1080/ 14992020802301142
66. Besser J., Koelewijn T., Zekveld A. A., Kramer S. E., Festen J. M., How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise-a review. Trends in Amplification 2013 17 2 75 93
67. Pichora-Fuller M. K., How cognition might influence hearing aid design, fitting, and outcomes. Hearing Journal 2009 62 11 32 35 2-s2.0-73949127203
68. Gatehouse S., Naylor G., Elberling C., Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment. International Journal of Audiology 2003 42 supplement 1 S77 S85 2-s2.0-0642343306 (Pubitemid 41626013)
69. Rudner M., Lunner T., Cognitive spare capacity as a window on hearing aid benefit. Semin Hear 2013 34 4 298 307
70. Foo C., Rudner M., Rönnberg J., Lunner T., Recognition of speech in noise with new hearing instrument compression release settings requeres explicit cognitive storage and processing capacity. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2007 18 7 618 631 2-s2.0-38749118217 10.3766/jaaa.18.7.8 (Pubitemid 351175763)
71. Lunner T., Sundewall-Thorén E., Interactions between cognition, compression, and listening conditions: effects on speech-in-noise performance in a two-channel hearing aid. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2007 18 7 604 617 2-s2.0-35848951797 10.3766/jaaa.18.7.7 (Pubitemid 351175762)
72. Rudner M., Foo C., Sundewall-Thorén E., Lunner T., Rönnberg J., Phonological mismatch and explicit cognitive processing in a sample of 102 hearing-aid users. International Journal of Audiology 2008 47 supplement 2 S91 S98 2-s2.0-56549125409 10.1080/14992020802304393
73. Rudner M., Foo C., Rönnberg J., Lunner T., Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2009 50 5 405 418 2-s2.0-70349328529 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00745.x
74. Cox R. M., Xu J., Short and long compression release times: speech understanding, real-world preferences, and association with cognitive ability. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2010 21 2 121 138 2-s2.0-77749317549 10.3766/jaaa.21.2.6
75. Dahlin E., Neely A. S., Larsson A., Bäckman L., Nyberg L., Transfer of learning after updating training mediated by the striatum. Science 2008 320 5882 1510 1512 2-s2.0-45849106902 10.1126/science.1155466 (Pubitemid 351929433)
76. Klingberg T., Fernell E., Olesen P. J., Johnson M., Gustafsson P., Dahlström K., Gillberg C. G., Forssberg H., Westerberg H., Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD-a randomized, controlled trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2005 44 2 177 186 2-s2.0-13244282969 10.1097/00004583-200502000-00010 (Pubitemid 40189829)
77. Owen A. M., Hampshire A., Grahn J. A., Stenton R., Dajani S., Burns A. S., Howard R. J., Ballard C. G., Putting brain training to the test. Nature 2010 465 7299 775 778 2-s2.0-77953412425 10.1038/nature09042
78. Anguera J., Boccanfuso J., Rintoul J., Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature 2013 501 7465 97 101
79. Henshaw H., Ferguson M. A., Efficacy of individual computer-based auditory training for people with hearing loss: a systematic review of the evidence. PLoS ONE 2013 8 5 2-s2.0-84877614578 10.1371/journal.pone.0062836 e62836
80. Pichora-Fuller M. K., Palmer C., Seewald R., Audition and cognition: what audiologists need to know about listening. Hearing Care for Adults 2007 Switzerland Stäfa 71 85
81. Mishra S., Rudner M., Lunner T., Rönnberg R., Speech understanding and cognitive spare capacity. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research (ISAAR '10) 2010 Elsinore, Denmark 305 313
82. Mishra S., Lunner T., Stenfelt S., Rönnberg J., Rudner M., Seeing the talker's face supports executive processing of speech in steady state noise. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 2013 7, article 96
83. Ng E. H. N., Rudner M., Lunner T., Pedersen M. S., Rönnberg J., Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users. International Journal of Audiology 2013 52 7 433 441 2-s2.0-84879201895 10.3109/14992027.2013.776181
84. Mishra S., Lunner T., Stenfelt S., Rönnberg J., Rudner M., Visual information can hinder working memory processing of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2013 56 4 1120 1132 2-s2.0-84879735444 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0033)
85. Barulli D., Stern Y., Efficiency, capacity, compensation, maintenance, plasticity: emerging concepts in cognitive reserve. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2013 17 10 502 509 2-s2.0-84883460880 10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.012
86. Satz P., Cole M. A., Hardy D. J., Rassovsky Y., Brain and cognitive reserve: mediator(s) and construct validity, a critique. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2011 33 1 121 130 2-s2.0-78651331364 10.1080/13803395.2010.493151
87. Sarampalis A., Kalluri S., Edwards B., Hafter E., Objective measures of listening effort: effects of background noise and noise reduction. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2009 52 5 1230 1240 2-s2.0-70349354193 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0111)
88. Hällgren M., Larsby B., Arlinger S., A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition. International Journal of Audiology 2006 45 4 227 237 2-s2.0-33646817380 10.1080/14992020500429583
89. Nilsson M., Soli S. D., Sullivan J. A., Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1994 95 2 1085 1099 2-s2.0-0028012490 (Pubitemid 24056373)
90. McCoy S. L., Tun P. A., Cox L. C., Colangelo M., Stewart R. A., Wingfield A., Hearing loss and perceptual effort: downstream effects on older adults' memory for speech. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 2005 58 1 22 33 2-s2.0-12844272311 10.1080/ 02724980443000151 (Pubitemid 40166893)
91. Murphy D. R., Craik F. I. M., Li K. Z. H., Schneider B. A., Comparing the effects of aging and background noise on short-term memory performance. Psychology and Aging 2000 15 2 323 334 2-s2.0-0033771366 10.1037//0882-7974.15. 2.323
92. Sumby W. H., Pollack I., Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1954 26, article 212
93. Mishra S., Stenfelt S., Lunner T., Rönnberg J., Rudner M., Cognitive spare capacity in older adults with hearing loss. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 2014 6, article 96 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00096
94. Erber N. P., Interaction of audition and vision in the recognition of oral speech stimuli. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1969 12 2 423 425 2-s2.0-0014529713
95. Bernstein J. G. W., Grant K. W., Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2009 125 5 3358 3372 2-s2.0-65549120772 10.1121/1.3110132
96. Grant K. W., Walden B. E., Seitz P. F., Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1998 103 5 2677 2690 2-s2.0-0031839502 10.1121/1.422788 (Pubitemid 28261601)
97. Grant K. W., Seitz P.-F., The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2000 108 3 I 1197 1208 2-s2.0-0033822769 10.1121/1.1288668
98. Fraser S., Gagné J.-P., Alepins M., Dubois P., Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: the effects of providing visual speech cues. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2010 53 1 18 33 2-s2.0-77249160250 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08- 0140)
99. Gosselin P. A., Gagné J.-P., Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise. International Journal of Audiology 2011 50 11 786 792 2-s2.0-80054087242 10.3109/14992027. 2011.599870
100. Frtusova J. B., Winneke A. H., Phillips N. A., ERP Evidence that auditory-visual speech facilitates working memory in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging 2013 28 2 481 494 2-s2.0-84881219808 10.1037/a0031243
101. Pichora-Fuller M. K., Schneider B. A., Daneman M., How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1995 97 1 593 608 2-s2.0-0028820977 10.1121/1.412282
102. Luce P. A., Pisoni D. B., Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 1998 19 1 1 36 2-s2.0-0031914738 10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001 (Pubitemid 28092986)
103. Lazard D. S., Lee H. J., Gaebler M., Kell C. A., Truy E., Giraud A. L., Phonological processing in post-lingual deafness and cochlear implant outcome. NeuroImage 2010 49 4 3443 3451 2-s2.0-74149088219 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11. 013
104. Moradi S., Lidestam B., Rönnberg J., Gated audiovisual speech identification in silence vs. noise: effects on time and accuracy. Frontiers in Psychology 2013 4, article 359
105. Andersson U., Deterioration of the phonological processing skills in adults with an acquired severe hearing loss. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2002 14 3 335 352 2-s2.0-0036323109 10.1080/09541440143000096 (Pubitemid 34832136)
106. Classon E., Rudner M., Rönnberg J., Working memory compensates for hearing related phonological processing deficit. Journal of Communication Disorders 2013 46 1 17 29 2-s2.0-84872389930 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.10.001
107. Classon E., Rudner M., Johansson M., Rönnberg J., Early ERP signature of hearing impairment in visual rhyme judgment. Frontiers in Psychology 2013 4, article 241 2-s2.0-84878908791 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00241
108. Rodd J. M., Davis M. H., Johnsrude I. S., The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. Cerebral Cortex 2005 15 8 1261 1269 2-s2.0-25444465994 10.1093/cercor/bhi009 (Pubitemid 41373618)
109. Hagerman B., Kinnefors C., Efficient adaptive methods for measuring speech reception threshold in quiet and in noise. Scandinavian Audiology 1995 24 1 71 77 2-s2.0-0028919267
110. Hagerman B., Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scandinavian Audiology 1982 11 2 79 87 2-s2.0-0019976176 (Pubitemid 12071211)
111. Lunner T., Hietkamp R. K., Andersen M. R., Hopkins K., Moore B. C., Effect of speech material on the benefit of temporal fine structure information in speech for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired participants. Ear and Hearing 2012 33 3 377 388 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182387a8c
112. Zekveld A. A., Rudner M., Johnsrude I. S., Rönnberg J., The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2013 134 3 2225 2234 2-s2.0-84883345850 10.1121/1.4817926
113. Sohoglu E., Peelle J. E., Carlyon R. P., Davis M. H., Predictive top-down integration of prior knowledge during speech perception. The Journal of Neuroscience 2012 32 25 8443 8453 2-s2.0-84862849269 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5069-11. 2012
114. Zekveld A. A., Kramer S. E., Vlaming M. S. M. G., Houtgast T., Audiovisual perception of speech in noise and masked written text. Ear and Hearing 2008 29 1 99 111 2-s2.0-37649011154 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31815d6d8d
115. Zekveld A. A., Rudner M., Johnsrude I. S., Heslenfeld D. J., Rönnberg J., Behavioral and fMRI evidence that cognitive ability modulates the effect of semantic context on speech intelligibility. Brain and Language 2012 122 2 103 113
116. Zekveld A. A., Rudner M., Johnsrude I. S., Festen J. M., Van Beek J. H. M., Rönnberg J., The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise. Ear and Hearing 2011 32 6 e16 e25 2-s2.0-80255134509 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318228036a
117. Signoret C., Johnsrude I., Classon E., Rudner M., Lexical access speed determines the role of working memory in pop-out. Proceedings of the Cognitive Hearing Science for Communication June 2013 Linköping, Sweden
118. Nyberg L., Lövdén M., Riklund K., Lindenberger U., Bäckman L., Memory aging and brain maintenance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2012 16 5 292 305
119. Baltes P. B., Lindenberger U., Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: a new window to the study of cognitive aging? Psychology and Aging 1997 12 1 12 21 2-s2.0-0031005504 10.1037/0882-7974.12.1.12 (Pubitemid 27157908)
120. Schneider B. A., Daneman M., Pichora-Fuller M. K., Listening in aging adults: from discourse comprehension to psychoacoustics. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2002 56 3 139 152 2-s2.0-0036729076
121. Lin F. R., Yaffe K., Xia J., Xue Q.-L., Harris T. B., Purchase-Helzner E., Satterfield S., Ayonayon H. N., Ferrucci L., Simonsick E. M., Hearing loss and cognitive decline in older adults. JAMA Internal Medicine 2013 173 4 293 299 2-s2.0-84874903658 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1868
122. Nilsson L.-G., Bäckman L., Erngrund K., Nyberg L., Adolfsson R., Bucht G., Karlsson S., Widing M., Winblad B., The betula prospective cohort study: memory, health, and aging. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 1997 4 1 1 32 2-s2.0-0031010522 (Pubitemid 27245220)
123. Rönnberg J., Danielsson H., Rudner M., Arlinger S., Sternäng O., Wahlin Å., Nilssond L.-G., Hearing loss is negatively related to episodic and semantic long-term memory but not to short-term memory. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2011 54 2 705 726 2-s2.0-79955639523 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0088)