The Signal-Cognition interface: Interactions between degraded auditory signals and cognitive processes

Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 385-393

  Stenfelt, Stefan ^a   RÖnnberg, Jerker ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cochlear model; Ease of Language Understanding (ELU); Hearning loss; Implicit and explicit processing; Peripheral hearing; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COCHLEA; COGNITION; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COCHLEA; COGNITION; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 70349307493     PISSN: 00365564     EISSN: 14679450     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00748.x     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Andersson, U. (2002). Deterioration of phonological processing skills in adults with an acquired severe hearing loss. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 335 352.
2. Akeroyd, M. (2008). Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impair. International Journal of Audiology 2008 47 (Suppl. 2 S125 S143.
3. Auer, E. T., Jr. (2009). Spoken word recognition by eye. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 419 425.
4. Auer, E. T., Jr. Bernstein, L. E. (2007). Enhanced visual speech perception in individuals with early-onset hearing impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 50, 1157 1165.
5. Baddeley, A.-D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4 (11 417 423.
6. Baer, T., Moore, B. C. Kluk, K. (2002). Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112 (3 1133 1144.
7. Bruce, I. C., Sachs, M. B. Young, E. D. (2003). An auditory-periphery model of the effects of acoustic trauma on auditory nerve responses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 369 388.
8. Buchsbaum, B. R. D'Esposito, M. (2008). Repetition suppression and reactivation in auditory - verbal short-term recognition memory. Cerebral Cortex, doi :.
9. Byrne, D., Dillon, H., Ching, T., Katsch, R. Keidser, G. (2001). NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 12, 37 51.
10. Campbell, R. (2008). The processing of audio-visual speech: Empirical and neural bases. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, 363, 1001 1010.
11. Carney, L. H. (1993). A model for the responses of low-frequency auditory-nerve fibres in cats. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 401 417.
12. Craik, F. I. M. (2007). The role of cognition in age-related hearing loss. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 18, 539 547.
13. Daneman, M. Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 450 466.
14. de Boer, E. (1997). Classical and non-classical models of the cochlea. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 2148 2150.
15. Edwards, B. (2007). The future of hearing aid technology. Trends in Amplification, 11 (1 31 45.
16. Elhilali, M. Shamma, S. A. (2008). A cocktail party with a cortical twist: How cortical mechanisms contribute to sound segregation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124 (6 3751 3771.
17. Evans, B. N. Dallos, P. (1993). Stereocilia displacement induced somatic motility of cochlear outer hair cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 90, 8247 8351.
18. Foo, C., Rudner, M., Rönnberg, J. Lunner, T. (2007). Recognition of speech in noise with new hearing instrument compression release settings requires explicit cognitive storage and processing capacity. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 18, 553 566.
19. Gates, G. A. Mills, J. H. (2005). Presbycusis. Lancet, 366 (9491 1111 1120.
20. Glasberg, B. R. Moore, B. C. (1989). Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech. Scandinavian Journal of Audiology, (Suppl. 32 1 25.
21. Glasberg, B. R. Moore, B. C. (1990). Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hearing Research, 47, 103 138.
22. Glasberg, B. R., Moore, B. C. Bacon, S. P. (1987). Gap detection and masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects. Journal of the Acoustical Society America, 81 (5 1546 1556.
23. Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 267 228.
24. Hannon, B. Daneman, M. (2001). A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 (1 103 128.
25. Hato, N., Stenfelt, S. Goode, R. L. (2003). Three-dimensional stapes footplate motion in human temporal bones. Audiology and Neurotology, 8, 140 152.
26. Kewley-Port, D., Zachary Burkle, T. Hee Lee, J. (2007). Contribution of consonant versus vowel information to sentence intelligibility for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, 2365 2375.
27. Kochkin, S. (2005). MarkeTrak VII: Hearing loss population tops 31 million people. Hearing Review, 12 (7 16 29.
28. Kollmeier, B. (1999). Signal Processing in the impaired auditory system and its implications for hearing instruments. In A. N. Rasmussen, P. A. Osterhammel, T. Andersson T. Poulsen (Eds Auditory models and non-linear hearing instruments: 18th Danavox Symposium (pp. 251 273). Denmark : Holmens Trykkeri.
29. Kramer, S. E., Kapteyn, T. S. Houtgast, T. (2006). Occupational performance: Comparing normally-hearing and hearing-impaired employees using the Amsterdam Checklist for Hearing and Work. International Journal of Audiology, 45 (9 503 512.
30. Lakshminarayanan, K. Tallal, P. (2007). Generalization of non-linguistic auditory perceptual training to syllable discrimination. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 25, 263 272.
31. Lidestam, B. (2009). Visual discrimination of vowel duration. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 427 435.
32. Luce, P. A. Pisoni, D. A. (1998). Recognising spoken words: The neighbourhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1 36.
33. Lunner, T. (2003). Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use. International Journal of Audiology, 42 (Suppl. 1 S49 S58.
34. Lunner, T. Sundewall-Thorén, E. (2007). Interactions between cognition, compression, and listening conditions: Effects on speech-in-noise performance in a two-channel hearing aid. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 18, 539 552.
35. Lunner, T., Rudner, M. Rönnberg, J. (2009). Cognition and hearing aids. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 395 403.
36. Lyon, R. F. (1982). A computational model of filtering, detection, and compression in the cochlea. IEEE ICASSP, 82, 1282 1285.
37. Lyxell, B. Rönnberg, J. (1991). Visual speech processing: Word decoding and word discrimination related to sentence-based speechreading and hearing-impairment. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 32, 9 17.
38. Marslen-Wilson, W. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71 103.
39. McClelland, J. L. Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 695 698.
40. Meddis, R. (1988). Simulation of auditory-neural transduction: Further studies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 1056 1063.
41. Meddis, R. (2006). Auditory-nerve first-spike latency and auditory absolute threshold: A computer model. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 406 417.
42. Mesgarani, N., David, S., Fritz, J. Shamma, S. (2008). honeme representation and classification in primary auditory cortex. Journal of the Acoustical Society America, 123, 899 909.
43. Miller, L. M., Escabí, M. A., Read, H. L. Schreiner, C. E. (2002). Spectrotemporal receptive fields in the lemniscal auditory thalamus and cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87 (1 516 527.
44. Mills, D. M. Schmiedt, R. A. (2004). Metabolic presbycusis: Differential changes in auditory brainstem and otoacoustic emission responses with chronic furosemide application in the gerbil. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 5, 1 10.
45. Moore, B. C. (2001). Dead regions in the Cochlea: Diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids. Trends in Amplification, 5, 1 34.
46. Moore, B. C., Glasberg, B. R. Stone, M. A. (2004). New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL. Ear and Hearing, 25 (5 478 487.
47. Moore, B. C., Vickers, D. A., Plack, C. J. Oxenham, A. J. (1999). Inter-relationship between different psychoacoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106 (5 2761 2778.
48. Näätänen, R. (2008). Mismatch negativity (MMN) as an index of central auditory system plasticity. International Journal of Audiology, 47 (Suppl. 2 S88 S92.
49. Obleser, J. Eisner, F. (2009). Pre-lexical abstraction of speech in the auditory cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences., 13 (1 14 19.
50. Obleser, J., Wise, R. J. S., Dresner, M. A. Scott, S. K. (2007). Functional integration across brain regions improves speech perception under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 2283 2289.
51. Oxenham, A. J., Bernstein, J. G. Penagos, H. (2004). Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 101 (5 1421 1425.
52. Patterson, R. D. Johnsrude, I. S. (2008). Functional imaging of the auditory processing applied to speech sounds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 1023 1035.
53. Patterson, R. D., Robinson, K., Holdsworth, J., McKeown, D., Zhang, C. Allerhand, M. M. (1992). Complex sounds and auditory images. In Y. Cazals, L. Demay K. Horner (Eds Auditory physiology and perception (pp. 429 446). Oxford : Pergamon Press.
54. Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2003). Processing speed and timing in aging adults: psychoacoustics, speech perception, and comprehension. International Journal of Audiology, 32, S59 S67.
55. Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2008). Use of supportive context by younger and older listeners: Balancing bottom-up and top-down information processing. International Journal of Audiology, 47, S72 S82.
56. Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., Macdonald, E., Pass, H. E. Brown, S. (2007). Temporal jitter disrupts speech intelligibility: A simulation of auditory aging. Hearing Research., 223, 114 121.
57. Poeppel, D., Idsardi, W. D. Wassenhove, V. van (2008). Speech perception at the interface of neurobiology and linguistics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 1071 1086.
58. Robles, L. Ruggero, M. A. (2001). Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiological Reviews, 81, 1305 1352.
59. Rosenhall, U., Pedersen, K. Svanborg, A. (1990). Presbycusis and noise-induced hearing loss. Ear and Hearing, 11 (4 257 263.
60. Rönnberg, J. (1990). Cognitive and communicative function: The effects of chronological age and "handicap age". European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2 (3 253 273.
61. Rönnberg, J. (2003). Cognition in the hearing impaired and deaf as a bridge between signal and dialogue: a framework and a model. International Journal of Audiology, 42 (Suppl. 1 S68 S76.
62. Rönnberg, J., Rudner, M. Ingvar, M. (2004). Neural correlates of working memory for sign language. Cognitive Brain Research, 20 (2 165 182.
63. Rönnberg, J., Rudner, M., Foo, C. Lunner, T. (2008). Cognition counts: A working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU). International Journal of Audiology, 47 (Suppl. 2 S171 S177.
64. Rönnberg, J., Söderfeldt, B. Risberg, J. (2000). The cognitive neuroscience of signed language. Acta Psychologica, 105, 237 254.
65. Rudner, M., Foo, C., Rönnberg, J. Lunner, T. (2009a). Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: Specific role for cognitive factors following nine-week experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 405 418.
66. Rudner, M., Foo, C., Sundewall-Thorén, E., Lunner, T. Rönnberg, J. (2008). Phonological mismatch and explicit cognitive processing in a sample of 102 hearing-aid users. International Journal of Audiology, 47 (Suppl. 2 S91 S98.
67. Rudner, M., Fransson, P., Ingvar, M., Nyberg, L. Rönnberg, J. (2007). Neural representation of binding lexical signs and words in the episodic buffer of working memory. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2258 2276.
68. Rudner, M., Lunner, T., Behrens, T., Sundewall-Thorén, E. Rönnberg, J. (2009b). Good cognitive resources make listening under challenging conditions seem less effortful. 9th European Federation of Audiology Societies (EFAS) Congress, Tenerife, Spain.
69. Rudner, M. Rönnberg, J. (2008). The role of the spisodic buffer in working memory for language processing. Cognitive Processes, 9, 19 28.
70. Schmiedt, R. A., Lang, H., Okamura, H. O. Schulte, B. A. (2002). Effects of furosemide applied chronically to the round window: a model of metabolic presbyacusis. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 9643 9650.
71. Schneider, B. A., Pichora-Fuller, M. K. Daneman, M. (in press). The effects of senescent changes in audition and cognition on spoken language comprehension. In S. Gordon-Salant, R. D. Frisina, A. Popper D. Fay (Eds The aging auditory system: Perceptual characterization and neural bases of presbycusis, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research. Berlin : Springer.
72. Schuknecht, H. F. Gacek, M. R. (1993). Cochlear pathology in presbycusis. Annals Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 102 (1 Pt 2 1 16.
73. Scollie, S., Seewald, R., Cornelisse, L., Moodie, S., Bagatto, M., Laurnagaray, D., Beaulac, S. Pumford, J. (2005). The Desired Sensation Level multistage input/output algorithm. Trends in Amplification, 9, 159 197.
74. Scott, S. K. Johnsrude, I. S. (2003). The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception. Trends in Neuroscience, 26, 100 107.
75. Shaw, E. A. G. (1974). Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 56, 1848 1861.
76. Söderfeldt, B., Ingvar, M., Rönnberg, J., Eriksson, L., Serrander, M. Stone-Elander, S. (1997). Signed and spoken language perception studied by positron emission tomography. Neurology, 49, 82 87.
77. Stenfelt, S. (2008). Towards understanding the specifics of cochlear hearing loss: A modeling approach. International Journal of Audiology, 47 (Suppl. 2 10 15.
78. Summerfield, A. Q. (1987). Some preliminaries to a theory of audiovisual speech processing. In B. Dodd R. Campbell (Eds Hearing by eye (pp. 58 82). Hove, UK : Lawrence Erlbaum.
79. Tallal, P. (2004). Opinion - improving language and literacy is a matter of time. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5 (9 721 728.
80. Van Tasell, D. (1993). Hearing loss, speech, and hearing aids. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 36, 228 244.
81. Viemeister, N. F. (1979). Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66 (5 1364 1380.
82. Wingfield, A. Grossman, M. (2006). Language and the aging brain: Patterns of neural compensation revealed by functional brain imaging. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 2830 2839.
83. Zekveld, A. A., George, E. L. J., Kramer, S. E., Goverts, S. T. Houtgast, T. (2007). The development of the text reception threshold test: A visual analogue of the speech reception threshold test. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 50, 576 584.