A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 227-237

  Hällgren, Mathias ^a,b   Larsby, Birgitta ^a   Arlinger, Stig ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIO RECORDING; AUDIOLOGY; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; FEMALE; HEARING IN NOISE TEST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONEME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SWEDEN; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, SPEECH; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NOISE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST; SWEDEN;

EID: 33646817380     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020500429583     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bench, J., Kowal, A. & Bamford, J. 1979. The BKB (Bamford-Kowal- Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. Br J Audiol, 13, 108-112.
2. Bertenstam, J., Blomberg, M., Carlson, R., Elenius, K., Granström, B., et al. 1995. Spoken dialogue data collected in the Waxholm project. Speech, Music and Hearing Quarterly Progress and Status Report, STL-QPSR 1. KTH, Stockholm, Sweden.
3. Byrne, D., Dillon, H., Khanh, T, Arlinger, S., Wilbraham, K., et al. 1994. An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. J Acoust Soc Am, 96, 2108-2120.
4. Fant, G. 1967. Kompendium i talöverföring. Dept. of speech communication, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden. (In Swedish.)
5. Hagerman, B. 1982. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol, 11, 79-87.
6. Hagerman, B. & Kinnefors, C. 1995. Efficient adaptive methods for measuring speech reception threshold in quiet and in noise. Scand Audiol, 24, 71-77.
7. Hedelin, P., Huber, D. & Leijon, A. 1988. Probability distributions of allophones, diphones and triphones in phonetic transcription of Swedish newspaper text. In: Technical report no 8, Dept. of Information Theory, School of Electrical and Computing Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
8. Hällgren, M. 2002. Listening span and speech recognition. Internal report. Department of Technical Audiology, Linköping University.
9. Kollmeier, B. & Wesselkamp, M. 1997. Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. J Acoust Soc Am, 102, 2412-2421.
10. Magnusson, L. 1995. Reliable clinical determination of speech recognition scores using Swedish PB words in speech-weighted noise. Scand Audiol, 24, 217-223.
11. Nilsson, M., Soli, S.D. & Sullivan, J.A. 1994. Development of the Hearing In Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1085-1099.
12. Nilsson, M., Soli, S. D. & Sumida, A. 1995. A definition of normal binaural sentence recognition in quiet and noise. Unpublished data.
13. Plomp, R. & Mimpen, A.M. 1979. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology, 18, 43-52.
14. Vaillancourt, V., Laroche, C., Mayer, C., Basque, C., Nali, M., et al. 2005. Adaptation of the HINT (hearing in noise test) for adult Canadian Francophone populations. Int J Audiol, 44, 358-69.
15. Versfeld, N.J., Daalder, L., Festen, J.M. & Houtgast, T. 2000. Methods for the selection of sentences materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 1671-1684.