Comprehensive population-averaged arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced vmagnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 658-665

  Onxley, Jennifer D ^a   Yoo, David S ^a   Muradyan, Naira ^b   Macfall, James R ^a   Brizel, David M ^a   Craciunescu, Oana I ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b ICAD INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; POPULATION STATISTICS;

ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; CHEMORADIATION THERAPIES; CONCURRENT CHEMORADIATION; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI; DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED; HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER; METHODS AND MATERIALS; PLASMA CONCENTRATION;

DISEASES;

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; ARTICLE; BLOOD LEVEL; CAROTID ARTERY; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; HEAD AND NECK CANCER; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT REPEATABILITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARAMETERS; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REGION OF INTEREST;

ALGORITHMS; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CAROTID ARTERIES; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; CONTRAST MEDIA; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84902104244     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: 1879355X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. A. Jemal, R. Siegel, and E. Ward et al. Cancer statistics, 2007 CA Cancer J Clin 57 2007 43 66
2. P.K. Ha, A. Hdeib, and D. Goldenberg et al. The role of positron emission tomography and computed tomography fusion in the management of early-stage and advanced-stage primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132 2006 12 16
3. P.J. Hoskin, M.I. Saunders, and K. Goodchild et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance scanning as a predictor of response to accelerated radiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer Br J Radiol 72 1999 1093 1098
4. R. Murakami, H. Uozumi, and T. Hirai et al. Impact of FDG-PET/CT imaging on nodal staging for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68 2007 377 382
5. N. Tomura, K. Omachi, and I. Sakuma et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapeutic efficacy in the head and neck tumors Am J Otolaryngol 26 2005 163 167
6. J. Wang, S. Takashima, and F. Takayama et al. Head and neck lesions: Characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar mr imaging Radiology 220 2001 621 630
7. O. Craciunescu, D. Brizel, and E. Cleland et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI in head and neck cancer patients: Variability of the precontrast longitudinal relaxation time (T10) Med Phys 37 2010 2683 2692
8. M.L. George, A.S. Dzik-Jurasz, and A.R. Padhani et al. Non-invasive methods of assessing angiogenesis and their value in predicting response to treatment in colorectal cancer Br J Surg 88 2001 1628 1636
9. N. Hylton Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as an imaging biomarker J Clin Oncol 24 2006 3293 3298
10. A.R. Padhani, C. Hayes, and L. Assersohn et al. Prediction of clinicopathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy at contrast-enhanced mr imaging: Initial clinical results Radiology 239 2006 361 374
11. A. Shukla-Dave, N. Lee, and H. Stambuk et al. Average arterial input function for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of neck nodal metastases BMC Med Phys 9 2009 4
12. J.S. Taylor, P.S. Tofts, and R. Port et al. MR imaging of tumor microcirculation: Promise for the new millennium J Magn Reson Imaging 10 1999 903 907
13. P.S. Tofts Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging J Magn Reson Imaging 7 1997 91 101
14. H.L. Cheng Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI J Magn Reson Imaging 28 2008 736 743
15. G.J. Parker, C. Roberts, and A. Macdonald et al. Experimentally-derived functional form for a population-averaged high-temporal-resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI Magn Reson Med 56 2006 993 1000
16. X. Li, E.B. Welch, and L.R. Arlinghaus et al. A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer Phys Med Biol 56 2011 5753 5769
17. R. Meng, S.D. Chang, and E.C. Jones et al. Comparison between population average and experimentally measured arterial input function in predicting biopsy results in prostate cancer Acad Radiol 17 2010 520 525
18. Y. Wang, W. Huang, and D.M. Panicek et al. Feasibility of using limited-population-based arterial input function for pharmacokinetic modeling of osteosarcoma dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data Magn Reson Med 59 2008 1183 1189
19. J.K. Hoang, S.K. Das, and K.R. Choudhury et al. Using FDG-PET to measure early treatment response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Quantifying intrinsic variability in order to understand treatment-induced change AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34 2013 1428 1433
20. M. Cutajar, I.A. Mendichovszky, and P.S. Tofts et al. The importance of aif roi selection in DCE-MRI renography: Reproducibility and variability of renal perfusion and filtration Eur J Radiol 74 2010 e154 e160
21. Y. Anzai, M.R. Prince, and T.L. Chenevert et al. MR angiography with an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide blood pool agent J Magn Reson Imaging 7 1997 209 214
22. P. Sharma, J. Socolow, and S. Patel et al. Effect of Gd-DTPA-BMA on blood and myocardial T1 at 1.5T and 3T in humans J Magn Reson Imaging 23 2006 323 330
23. D.M. McGrath, D.P. Bradley, and J.L. Tessier et al. Comparison of model-based arterial input functions for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in tumor bearing rats Magn Reson Med 61 2009 1173 1184
24. P. Schmitt, M. Kotas, and A. Tobermann et al. Quantitative tissue perfusion measurements in head and neck carcinoma patients before and during radiation therapy with a non-invasive MR imaging spin-labeling technique Radiother Oncol 67 2003 27 34
25. O.I. Craciunescu, D.S. Yoo, and E. Cleland et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in head-and-neck cancer: The impact of region of interest selection on the intra- and interpatient variability of pharmacokinetic parameters Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82 2012 e345 e350
26. J.M. Bland, and D.G. Altman Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 1986 307 310
27. MedCalc Softward. Wilcoxon test (paired samples). Available at: http://www.medcalc.org/manual/wilcoxon.php. Accessed December 18, 2013.
28. D.J. Collins, and A.R. Padhani Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of tumor perfusion. Approaches and biomedical challenges IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 23 2004 65 83
29. H. Konouchi, J. Asaumi, and Y. Yanagi et al. Evaluation of tumor proliferation using dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI of oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma Oral Oncol 39 2003 290 295
30. G.V. Shah, N.J. Fischbein, and D. Gandhi et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging Topics Magn Reson Imaging 15 2004 71 77
31. P. Di Giovanni, C.A. Azlan, and T.S. Ahearn et al. The accuracy of pharmacokinetic parameter measurement in DCE-MRI of the breast at 3 T Phys Med Biol 55 2010 121 132
32. R.E. Port, M.V. Knopp, and G. Brix Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using Gd-DTPA: Interindividual variability of the arterial input function and consequences for the assessment of kinetics in tumors Magn Reson Med 45 2001 1030 1038
33. T. Pabst, W. Kenn, and W.A. Kaiser et al. Understanding why contrast enhancement in dynamic MRI is not reproducible: Illustration with a simple phantom Breast J 7 2001 166 170
34. Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance. QIBA Wiki. Available at: http://qibawiki.rsna.org/index.php?title=Main-Page. Accessed December 16, 2013.
35. J. Onxley Toward Developing Pharmacokinetic Response Criteria to Chemoradiation in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI [master's thesis] 2012 Duke University Durham, NC