A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 56, Issue 17, 2011, Pages 5753-5769

  Li, Xia ^a   Welch, E Brian ^a   Arlinghaus, Lori R ^a   Chakravarthy, A Bapsi ^a,b   Xu, Lei ^a   Farley, Jaime ^b   Loveless, Mary E ^a,c   Mayer, Ingrid A ^a,b   Kelley, Mark C ^a,b   Meszoely, Ingrid M ^a,b   Means Powell, Julie A ^a,b   Abramson, Vandana G ^a   Grau, Ana M ^a,b   Gore, John C ^a,b,c,d   Yankeelov, Thomas E ^a,b,c,d  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT INGRAM CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; AUTOMATIC TRACKING; BREAST CANCER; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DATA SETS; DCE-MRI; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN BREAST CANCER; MR SCANNERS; NOVEL METHODS; PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS; PHILIPS; PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; REGION OF INTEREST; SEMI-AUTOMATED; STANDARD MODEL; TRACKING METHOD;

CHEMOTHERAPY; DISEASES; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; POPULATION STATISTICS; RESONANCE;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AXILLARY ARTERY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCINTIGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VASCULARIZATION;

ALGORITHMS; AXILLARY ARTERY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PERFUSION IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 80052069215     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/17/018     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ah-See M L et al 2008 Early changes in functional dynamic magnetic resonance imaging predict for pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer Clin. Cancer Res. 14 6580-9
2. Cao Y, Li D, Shen Z and Normolle D 2010 Sensitivity of quantitative metrics derived from DCE MRI and a pharmacokinetic model to image quality and acquisition parameters Acad. Radiol. 17 468-78
3. Checkley D, Tessier J J, Wedge S R, Dukes M, Kendrew J, Curry B, Middleton B and Waterton J C 2003 Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of vascular changes induced by the VEGF-signalling inhibitor ZD4190 in human tumour xenografts Magn. Reson. Imaging 21 475-82 (Pubitemid 36899079)
4. Chen J, Yao J and Thomasson D 2008 Automatic determination of arterial input function for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in tumor assessment Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 11 594-601
5. Cheng H L 2008 Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 28 736-43
6. Choyke P L, Dwyer A J and Knopp M V 2003 Functional tumor imaging with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 17 509-20 (Pubitemid 36528666)
7. Dagia C and Ditchfield M 2008 3T MRI in paediatrics: challenges and clinical applications Eur. J. Radiol. 68 309-19
8. Delille J P, Slanetz P J, Yeh E D, Halpern E F, Kopans D B and Garrido L 2003 Invasive ductal breast carcinoma response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: noninvasive monitoring with functional MR imaging pilot study Radiology 228 63-9 (Pubitemid 36736070)
9. Guo Y, Sivaramakrishna R, Lu C C, Suri J S and Laxminarayan S 2006 Breast image registration techniques: a survey Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 44 15-26 (Pubitemid 43949723)
10. Hamstra D A et al 2005 Evaluation of the functional diffusion map as an early biomarker of time-to-progression and overall survival in high-grade glioma Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 16759-64 (Pubitemid 41688850)
11. Hayes C, Padhani A R and Leach M O 2002 Assessing changes in tumour vascular function using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging NMR Biomed. 15 154-63 (Pubitemid 34213405)
12. Henderson E, Rutt B K and Lee T Y 1998 Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease Magn. Reson. Imaging 16 1057-73 (Pubitemid 29196842)
13. Kuhl C K 2007 Breast MR imaging at 3T Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. North Am. 15 315-20 vi
14. Landis C S, Li X, Telang F W, Coderre J A, Micca P L, Rooney W D, Latour L L, Vetek G, Palyka I and Springer C S 2000 Determination of the MRI contrast agent concentration time course in vivo following bolus injection: effect of equilibrium transcytolemmal water exchange Magn. Reson. Med. 44 563-74
15. Lin L I 1989 A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility Biometrics 45 255-68
16. Martincich L et al 2004 Monitoring response to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 83 67-76 (Pubitemid 38141894)
17. McGrath D M, Bradley D P, Tessier J L, Lacey T, Taylor C J and Parker G J M 2009 Comparison of model-based arterial input functions for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in tumor bearing rats Magn. Reson. Med. 61 1173-84
18. Mouridsen K, Christensen S, Gyldensted L and Ostergaard L 2006 Automatic selection of arterial input function using cluster analysis Magn. Reson. Med. 55 524-31 (Pubitemid 43352550)
19. Nagashima T, Sakakibara M, Nakamura R, Arai M, Kadowaki M, Kazama T, Nakatani Y, Koda K and Miyazaki M 2006 Dynamic enhanced MRI predicts chemosensitivity in breast cancer patients Eur. J. Radiol. 60 270-4 (Pubitemid 44635046)
20. Parker G J, Jackson A, Waterton J C and Buckley D L 2003 Automated arterial input function extraction for T1-Weighted DCE-MRI Proc. Intl Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. (ISMRM) (Toronto, Canada) p 1264
21. Parker G J M, Roberts C, Macdonald A, Buonaccorsi G A, Cheung S, Buckley D L, Jackson A, Watson Y, Davies K and Jayson G C 2006 Experimentally-derived functional form for a population-averaged high-temporal-resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI Magn. Reson. Med. 56 993-1000 (Pubitemid 44691341)
22. Rijpkema M, Kaanders J H, Joosten F B, van der Kogel A J and Heerschap A 2001 Method for quantitative mapping of dynamic MRI contrast agent uptake in human tumors J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 14 457-63 (Pubitemid 32906564)
23. Rohde G K, Aldroubi A and Dawant B M 2003 The adaptive bases algorithm for intensity-based nonrigid image registration IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22 1470-9
24. Rueckert D, Sonoda L I, Hayes C, Hill D L, Leach M O and Hawkes D J 1999 Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18 712-21 (Pubitemid 32262025)
25. Schabel M C, Morrell G R, Oh K Y, Walczak C A, Barlow R B and Neumayer L A 2010 Pharmacokinetic mapping for lesion classification in dynamic breast MRI J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 31 1371-8
26. Wang Y, Huang W, Panicek D A, Schwartz L H and Koutcher J A 2008 Feasibility of using limited-population-based arterial input function for pharmacokinetic modeling of osteosarcoma dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data Magn. Reson. Med. 59 1183-9 (Pubitemid 351590533)
27. Yankeelov T E and Gore J C 2007 Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology: theory, data acquisition, analysis, and examples Curr. Med. Imaging Rev. 3 91-107 (Pubitemid 46773870)
28. Yankeelov T E et al 2007 Integration of quantitative DCE-MRI and ADC mapping to monitor treatment response in human breast cancer: initial results Magn. Reson. Imaging 25 1-13 (Pubitemid 46048940)
29. Yankeelov T E, Rooney W D, Huang W, Dyke J P, Li X, Tudorica A, Lee J H, Koutcher J A and Springer C S Jr 2005 Evidence for shutter-speed variation in CR bolus-tracking studies of human pathology NMR Biomed. 18 173-85 (Pubitemid 40716124)
30. Yankeelov T E, Rooney W D, Li X and Springer C S 2003 Variation of the relaxographic 'shutter-speed' for transcytolemmal water exchange affects the CR bolus-tracking curve shape Magn. Reson. Med. 50 1151-69 (Pubitemid 37494016)