Understanding why contrast enhancement in dynamic MRI is not reproducible: Illustration with a simple phantom

Breast Journal

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 166-170

  Pabst, Thomas ^a   Kenn, Werner ^a   Kaiser, Werner A ^b   Hahn, Dietbert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Comparative studies; Contrast enhancement; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mammography; Phantom

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; REPRODUCIBILITY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALIBRATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0034930874     PISSN: 1075122X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2001.007003166.x     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Contrast enhanced MRI of the breast: Technical aspects and pitfalls
2. MR-imaging of the breast. Fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA
3. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast. Comparison of two different doses of gadopentetate dimeglumine
4. Benign and malignant breast lesions. Differentiation with Echo-planar MR imaging
5. MR-Mammographie bei 0,5 Tesla und 1,5 Tesla, Teil 2
6. Dynamische 3-D MR-Mammographie mit Hilfe einer schnellen Gradienten-Echo-Sequenz
7. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: Pulse sequence with fat suppression and magnetization transfer contrast
8. MR-Mammographie - Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme