Gcn4p and the Crabtree effect of yeast: Drawing the causal model of the Crabtree effect in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and explaining evolutionary trade-offs of adaptation to galactose through systems biology

FEMS Yeast Research

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 654-662

  Martínez, José L ^a   Bordel, Sergio ^a   Hong, Kufk Ki ^a   Nielsen, Jens ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bas1; Crabtree effect; Flux analysis; Gcn4; Random sampling

Indexed keywords

ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE; CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; ERGOSTEROL; GALACTOKINASE; GALACTOSE; GLUCOKINASE; GLUCOSE; ISOCITRATE DEHYDROGENASE; PROTON TRANSPORTING ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE SYNTHASE; RAS PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR BAS1P; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR GCN4P; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR PHO2P; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOK2P; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR STE12P; TRANSCRIPTOME; UBIQUINOL CYTOCHROME C REDUCTASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; URIDINE DIPHOSPHATE GLUCOSE 4 EPIMERASE; BAS1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; BASIC LEUCINE ZIPPER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; GCN4 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN; PHO2 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; TRANSACTIVATOR PROTEIN;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID METABOLISM; ARTICLE; BATCH FERMENTATION; CARBON SOURCE; CITRIC ACID CYCLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRAB TREE EFFECT; DOWN REGULATION; FUNGUS GROWTH; GENE EXPRESSION; GLUCOSE TRANSPORT; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; OXIDATIVE PHOSPHORYLATION; PHENOTYPE; POINT MUTATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; TRIPLICATE BATCH FERMENTATION; UPREGULATION; WILD TYPE; ADAPTATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; BASIC-LEUCINE ZIPPER TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; GALACTOSE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GLUCOSE; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; TRANS-ACTIVATORS;

EID: 84902073399     PISSN: 15671356     EISSN: 15671364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1567-1364.12153     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bhoite LT, Allen JM, Garcia E, Thomas LR, Gregory ID, Voth WP, Whelihan K, Rolfes RJ & Stillman DJ (2002) Mutations in the Pho2 (Bas1) transcription factor that differentially affect activation with its partner proteins Bas1, Pho4 and Swi5. J Biol Chem 227: 37612-37618.
2. Bordel S, Agren R & Nielsen J (2010) Sampling the solution space in genome-scale metabolic networks reveals transcriptional regulation in key enzymes. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000859.
3. Canelas AB, Harrison N, Fazio A et al. (2010) Integrated multilaboratory systems biology reveals differences in protein metabolism between two reference yeast strains. Nat Commun 1: 145.
4. Engelberg D, Klein C, Martinetto H, Struhl K & Karin M (1994) The UV response involving the Ras signaling pathway and AP-1 transcription factors is conserved between yeast and mammals. Cell 77: 381-390.
5. Fendt SM, Oliveira AP, Christen S, Picotti P, Dechant RC & Sauer U (2010) Unraveling condition-dependent networks of transcription factors that control metabolic pathway activity in yeast. Mol Syst Biol 6: 432.
6. Hinnebusch AG & Natarajan K (2002) Gcn4p, a master regulator of gene expression, is controlled at multiple levels by diverse signals of starvation and stress. Eukariot Cell 1: 22-32.
7. Hong K & Nielsen J (2012) Recovery of phenotypes obtained through adaptive evolution through inverse metabolic engineering. Appl Environ Microbiol 78: 7579-7586.
8. Hong K, Vongsangnak V, Vemuri G & Nielsen J (2011) Unravelling evolutionary strategies of yeast for improving galactose utilization through integrated systems level analysis. P Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 12179-12184.
9. Hong K-K, Hou J, Shoaie S, Nielsen J & Bordel S (2012) Dynamic 13C-labeling experiments prove important differences in protein turnover rate between two Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. FEMS Yeast Res 12: 741-747.
10. Huberts DHEW, Niebel B & Heinemann M (2012) A flux sensing mechanism could regulate the switch between respiration and fermentation. FEMS Yeast Res 12: 118-128.
11. Liu Z & Butow RA (2006) Mitochondrial retrograde signaling. Annu Rev Genet 40: 159-185.
12. Grr1. Mol Biol Cell 16: 4893-4904.
13. Moxley JF, Jewett MC, Antoniewicz MR et al. (2009) Linking high-resolution metabolic flux phenotypes and transcriptional regulation in yeast modulated by the global regulator Gcn4p. P Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 4193-4198.
14. Oliveira AP, Patil KR & Nielsen J (2008) Architecture of transcriptional regulatory circuits is knitted over the topology of bio-molecular interaction networks. BMC Syst Biol 2: 17.
15. Österlund T, Nookaew I, Bordel S & Nielsen J (2013) Mapping condition-dependent regulation of metabolism in yeast through genome-scale modelling. BMC Syst Biol 7: 36.
16. Santangelo GM (2006) Glucose signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 70: 253-282.
17. Vemuri GN, Eitemann MA, McEwen JE, Olsson L & Nielsen J (2007) Increasing NADH oxidation reduces overflow metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. P Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 2042-2047.
18. Ward MP, Gimeno CJ, Fink GR & Garrett S (1995) SOK may regulate cyclic AMP-Dependent protein kinase-stimulated growth and pseudohyphal development by repressing transcription. Mol Cell Biol 15: 6854-6863.
19. Westergaard SL, Oliveira AP, Bro C, Olsson L & Nielsen J (2007) A systems biology approach to study glucose repression in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 96: 134-145.
20. Zaman S, Lippman SI, Zhao X & Broach JR (2008) How Saccharomyces responds to nutrients. Annu Rev Genet 42: 27-81.
21. Zaman S, Lippman SI, Schneper L, Slonim N & Broach JR (2009) Glucose regulates transcription in yeast through a network of signaling pathways. Mol Syst Biol 5: 245.
22. Zhou H & Winston F (2001) NRG1 is required for glucose repression of the SUC2 and GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genet 2: 5.