Dynamic 13C-labeling experiments prove important differences in protein turnover rate between two Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains

FEMS Yeast Research

Volumn 12, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 741-747

  Hong, Kuk Ki ^a,b   Hou, Jin ^a,c   Shoaie, Saeed ^a   Nielsen, Jens ^a   Bordel, Sergio ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b CJ Corporation   (South Korea)

^c SHANDONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

ATP costs; C13 labelling; Protein turnover

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; ALANINE; AMINO ACID; ASPARTIC ACID; CARBON 13; GLYCINE; ISOLEUCINE; LEUCINE; PROLINE; PROTEASOME; THREONINE; VALINE; CARBON; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CHEMOSTAT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNGAL STRAIN; ISOTOPE LABELING; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN METABOLISM; PROTEIN POLYMERIZATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TURNOVER TIME; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENERGY METABOLISM; METABOLISM;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; AMINO ACIDS; CARBON ISOTOPES; ENERGY METABOLISM; ISOTOPE LABELING; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84867641516     PISSN: 15671356     EISSN: 15671364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2012.00823.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Badawy AA, Morgan CJ & Turner JA (2008) Application of the Phenomenex EZ:faasttrade mark amino acid analysis kit for rapid gas-chromatographic determination of concentrations of plasma tryptophan and its brain uptake competitors. Amino Acids 34: 587-596.
2. Benaroudj N, Zwickl P, Seemuller E, Baumeister W & Goldberg AL (2003) ATP hydrolysis by the proteasome regulatory complex PAN serves multiple functions in protein degradation. Mol Cell 11: 69-78.
3. Canelas AB, Harrison N, Fazio A et al. (2010) Integrated multilaboratory systems biology reveals differences in protein metabolism between two reference yeast strains. Nat Commun 1: 145.
4. Gombert AK, Moreira dos Santos M, Christensen B & Nielsen J (2001) Network identification and flux quantification in the central metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under different conditions of glucose repression. J Bacteriol 183: 1441-1451.
5. Kaspar H, Dettmer K, Gronwald W & Oefner PJ (2008) Automated GC-MS analysis of free amino acids in biological fluids. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 870: 222-232.
6. Nookaew I, Jewett MC, Meechai A et al. (2008) The genome-scale metabolic model iIN800 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its validation: a scaffold to query lipid metabolism. BMC Syst Biol 2: 71.
7. Olivares-Hernández R, Bordel S & Nielsen J (2011) Codon usage variability determines the correlation between proteome and transcriptome fold changes. BMC Syst Biol 5: 33.
8. Price RG & Spiro RG (1977) Studies on the metabolism of the renal glomerular basement membrane. Turnover measurements in the rat with the use of radiolabeled amino acids. J Biol Chem 252: 8597-8602.
9. Princiotta MF, Finzi D, Qian SB et al. (2003) Quantitating protein synthesis, degradation, and endogenous antigen processing. Immunity 18: 343-354.
10. Schubert U, Anton LC, Gibbs J, Norbury CC, Yewdell JW & Bennink JR (2000) Rapid degradation of a large fraction of newly synthesized proteins by proteasomes. Nature 404: 770-774.
11. Schwanhausser B, Busse D, Li N et al. (2011) Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 473: 337-342.
12. Stephanopoulos G, Aristidou AA & Nielsen JH (1998) Metabolic Engineering: Principles and Methodologies. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.