The embedded developer: Using project ecologies to analyse local property development networks

Town Planning Review

Volumn 84, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 227-249

  Henneberry, John ^a   Parris, Simon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

personal networks; planners' influence; project ecologies; property development; urban milieus

Indexed keywords

COMPLEXITY; HETEROGENEITY; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; PROPERTY MARKET; THEORETICAL STUDY; URBAN RENEWAL;

EID: 84878045245     PISSN: 00410020     EISSN: 1478341X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3828/tpr.2013.13     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. ADAMS, D. (1994), Urban Planning and the Development Process, London, UCL Press.
2. ADAMS, D. AND TIESDELL, S. (2010), 'Planners as market actors: rethinking state-market relationsin land and property', Planning Theory and Practice, 11, 187-207.
3. ADAMS, D., DISBERRY, A., HUTCHISON, N. AND MUNJOMA, T. (2001), 'Ownership constraints tobrownfield redevelopment', Environment and Planning A, 33, 453-77.
4. ADAMS, D., ALLMENDINGER, P., DUNSE, N., HOUSTON, D., TIESDELL, S., TOWNEND, J., TUROK, I. ANDWHITE, M. (2003), Assessing the Impact of Planning, Housing, Transport and Regeneration Policieson Land Pricing (report to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister by the Universities ofAberdeen and Glasgow), New Horizons Research Project.
5. ADAMS, D., DUNSE, N. AND WHITE, M. (2005), 'Conceptualising state-market relations in landand property: the growth of institutionalism-extension or challenge to mainstreameconomics', in D. Adams, C. Watkins and M. White (eds), Planning, Public Policy & PropertyMarkets, Oxford, Blackwell, 37-55.
6. ADAMS, D., LEISHMAN, C. AND WATKINS, C. (2011), 'Housebuilder networks and residential landmarkets', Urban Studies, 49, 705-20 (published online 23 May 2011).
7. AMIN, A. AND THRIFT, N. (1994), 'Living in the global', in A. Amin and N. Thrift (eds), Globalization,Institutions and Regional Development in Europe, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1-21.
8. BALL, M. (1983), Housing Policy and Economic Power, London, Methuen.
9. BALL, M. (1998), 'Institutions in British property research: a review', Urban Studies, 35, 1501-17. (Pubitemid 28441451)
10. BALL, R. (1999), 'Developers, regeneration and sustainability issues in the re-use of vacantindustrial buildings', Building Research & Information, 27, 140-48. (Pubitemid 129652362)
11. BALL, R. (2002a), 'Developers in local property markets: assessing the re-use of vacant industrialbuildings in an old industrial area', in S. Guy and J. Henneberry (eds), Development andDevelopers: Perspectives on Property, Oxford, Blackwell, 158-80.
12. BALL, R. (2002b), 'Re-use potential and vacant industrial premises: revisiting the regenerationissue in Stoke-on-Trent', Journal of Property Research, 19, 93-110. (Pubitemid 34749944)
13. CAMPBELL, C. (2006), 'Just planning: the art of situated ethical judgement', Journal of PlanningEducation and Research, 26, 92-106.
14. CHARNEY, I. (2003), 'Spatial fix and spatial substitutability practices among Canada's largestoffice development firms', Urban Geography, 24, 386-409.
15. CHARNEY, I (2007), 'Intra-metropolitan preferences of property developers in greater Toronto'soffice market', Geoforum, 38, 1179-89. (Pubitemid 47500685)
16. CLAYDON, J. AND SMITH, B. (1997), 'Negotiating planning gains through the British developmentcontrol system', Urban Studies, 34, 2003-22.
17. COIACETTO, E. (2000), 'Places shape place shapers? Real estate developers' outlooks concerningcommunity, planning and development differ between places', Planning Practice & Research,15, 347-53.
18. COULSON, A. AND FERRARIO, C. (2007), 'Institutional thickness: local governance and economicdevelopment in Birmingham, England', International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,31, 591-615. (Pubitemid 47604471)
19. DETR (department of environment, transport and the regions) (2000), Our Towns and Cities:The Future-Delivering an Urban Renaissance (Cmnd. 4911), London, The Stationary Office.
20. EGGERTSSON, T. (1990), Economic Behavior and Institutions, Cambridge, Cambridge UniversityPress.
21. ENGWALL, M. (2001), Multiproject Management: Effects, Issues and Propositions for Future Research, Stockholm,The Fenix Research Program/IMIT Stockholm School of Economics, http://www.fenix.chalmers.se/publications/2001. htm (accessed 4 May 2008).
22. ENGWALL, M. (2003), 'No project is an island: linking projects to history and context', ResearchPolicy, 32, 789-808.
23. ENNIS, F. (ed.) (2003), Infrastructure Provision and the Negotiating Process, Aldershot Ashgate.
24. EVANS, A. (2003), 'The development of urban economics in the twentieth century', RegionalStudies, 37, 521-29. (Pubitemid 36915035)
25. FAINSTEIN, S. (2000), 'New directions in planning theory', Urban Affairs Review, 35, 451-78. (Pubitemid 30144738)
26. FALUDI, A. (2000), 'The performance of spatial planning', Planning Practice and Research, 15,299-318. (Pubitemid 32148989)
27. FISCHER, F. AND FORESTER, J. (1993), 'Editors' Introduction', in F. Fischer and J. Forester (eds),The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, London, UCL Press, 1-27.
28. FORESTER, J. (1987), 'Anticipating implementation: normative practices in planning policy andanalysis', in F. Fischer and J. Forester (eds), Confronting Values in Policy Analysis: The Politics ofCriteria, Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 153-73.
29. FORESTER, J.(1989), Planning in the Face of Power, Los Angeles, University of California Press.
30. FRANCES, J., LEVACIC?, R., MITCHELL, J. AND THOMPSON, G. (1991), 'Introduction', in G. Thompson,J. Frances, R. Levacíc and J. Mitchell (eds), Markets, Hierarchies and Networks, London, Sage,1-23.
31. GALLIMORE, P., HANSZ, A. AND GRAY, A. (2000), 'Decision-making in small property companies',Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 18, 602-12.
32. GORE, T. AND NICHOLSON, D. (1991), 'Models of the land-development process: a critical review',Environment and Planning A, 23, 705-30.
33. GRABHER, G. (2001), 'Locating economic action: projects, networks, localities, institutions',Environment and Planning A, 33, 1329-34.
34. GRABHER, G. (2002a), 'Cool projects, boring institutions: temporary collaboration in socialcontext', Regional Studies, 36, 205-14. (Pubitemid 34523455)
35. GRABHER, G. (2002b), 'The project ecology of advertising: tasks, talents and teams', RegionalStudies, 36, 245-62. (Pubitemid 34523458)
36. GRABHER, G. (2004a), 'Temporary architectures of learning: knowledge governance in projectecologies', Organisation Studies, 25, 1491-514. (Pubitemid 39620535)
37. GRABHER, G. (2004b), 'Learning in projects, remembering in networks? Communality, sociality,and connectivity in project ecologies', European Urban and Regional Studies, 11, 103-23. (Pubitemid 38464280)
38. GRAHAM, R. AND ENGLUND, R. (1997), Creating an Environment for Successful Projects, San Francisco,Jossey-Bass.
39. GUY, S. AND HENNEBERRY, J. (2000), 'Understanding urban development process: integrating theeconomic and the social in property research', Urban Studies, 37, 2300-416.
40. GUY, S. AND HENNEBERRY, J. (2002), 'Bridging the divide? Complementary perspectives onproperty', Urban Studies, 39, 1471-78. (Pubitemid 34781245)
41. GUY, S., HENNEBERRY, J. AND ROWLEY, S. (2002), 'Development cultures and urban regeneration',Urban Studies, 39, 1181-96. (Pubitemid 34657800)
42. HEALEY, P. (1991), 'Models of the development process: a review', Journal of Property Research, 8,219-38.
43. HEALEY, P. (1992a), 'An institutional model of the development process', Journal of PropertyResearch, 9, 33-44.
44. HEALEY, P. (1992b), 'A planner's day: knowledge and action in communicative practice', Journalof the American Planning Association, 58, 9-20.
45. HEALEY, P. (1993), 'Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory', in F. FISCHER AND J. FORESTER (eds), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, London,UCL Press, 233-53.
46. HEALEY, P. (1998), 'Regulating property development and the capacity of the developmentindustry', Journal of Property Research, 15, 211-27. (Pubitemid 28478739)
47. HEALEY, P. (2006), Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (2nd edn), Basingstoke,Palgrave Macmillan.
48. HEALEY, P. AND BARRETT, S. M. (1990), 'Structure and agency in land and property developmentprocesses: some ideas for research', Urban Studies, 27, 89-104. (Pubitemid 20392901)
49. HODGSON, G. M. (1988), Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for Modern Institutional Economics,Cambridge, Polity Press.
50. HODGSON, G. M. (1994), 'Institutionalism old and new', in G. Hodgson, W. Samuels andM. Tool (eds), The Elgar Companion to Institutional and Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 1, Aldershot,Edward Elgar, 397-402.
51. HODGSON, G. M. (1998), 'The Approach of Institutional Economics', Journal of Economic Literature,36, 166-92. (Pubitemid 128462049)
52. HODGSON, G. M. (2006), 'What are institutions?', Journal of Economic Issues, 40, 1-25. (Pubitemid 43555618)
53. LOWNDES, V. (2002), 'Institutionalism', in D. Marsh and G. Stoker (eds), Theory and Methods inPolitical Science (2nd edn), Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 90-108.
54. MCCARTHY, J. (2007), Partnership, Collaborative Planning and Urban Regeneration, Aldershot, Ashgate.
55. MCGREAL, S., ADAIR, A., BERRY, J., DEDDIS, B. AND HIRST, S. (2000), 'Accessing private sector financein urban regeneration: investor and non-investor perspectives', Journal of Property Research,17, 109-31. (Pubitemid 30369185)
56. MCGUIRK, P. (2001), 'Situating communicative planning theory: context, power, and knowledge',Environment and Planning A, 33, 195-217. (Pubitemid 32333932)
57. MCNAMARA, P. (1983), 'Towards a classification of land developers', Urban Law and Policy, 6,87-94.
58. MCNAMARA, P. (1984), 'The role of local real estate agents in the residential developmentprocess', Land Development Studies, 1, 101-12.
59. MCNAMARA, P. (1988), 'Interests in land planning in action', in P. Healey, P. McNamara, M. ELSON AND J. DOAK (eds), Land Use Planning and the Mediation of Urban Change, Cambridge,Cambridge University Press, 152-73.
60. MORLEY, S. (2002), 'The financial appraisal of development projects', in S. Guy and J. Henneberry(eds), Development and Developers-Perspectives on Property, Oxford, Blackwell, 73-95.
61. NOORDERHAVEN. G. (1996), 'Opportunism and trust in transaction costs economics', in J. Groenewegen (ed.), Transaction Costs Economics and Beyond, Boston/Dordrecht/London,Kluwer Academic Publishers.
62. PALM, R. (1979), 'Financial and real estate institutions in the housing market: a study of recenthouse price changes in the San Francisco Bay area', in D. T. Herbert and R. J. Johnston(eds), Geography and the Urban Environment: Progress in Research and Applications, Chichester,Wiley, 83-123.
63. RICHARDSON, T. (1996), 'Foucauldian discourse: power and truth in urban and regional policymaking', European Planning Studies, 4, 279-92.
64. ROTHSTEIN, B. (1996), 'Political institutions: an overview', in R. Goodin and H. Klingemann(eds), A New Handbook of Political Science, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 133-66.
65. RUTHERFORD, M. (1994), Institutions in Economics: The Old and the New Institutionalism, Cambridge,Cambridge University Press.
66. SÖDERLUND, J. (2004), 'On the broadening scope of the research on projects: a review and amodel for analysis', International Journal of Project Management, 22, 655-67. (Pubitemid 39364214)
67. STAKE, R. (1999), The Art of Case Study Research, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.
68. SYDOW, J., LINDKVIST, L AND DEFILLIPI, R. (2004), 'Project-based organizations, embeddednessand repositories of knowledge' (editorial), Organisation Studies, 25, 1475-89.
69. YIFTACHEL, O. AND HUXLEY, M. (2000), 'Situating communicative planning theory: context,power, and knowledge', International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24, 907-13.
70. YIN, R. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.