Decision making and brownfield management

E a M: Ekonomie a Management

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 19-32

  Aguilar, Silvia Čiháková ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF LIBEREC   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Brownfields; Decision making process; Historical contamination; Stakeholder theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350141639     PISSN: 12123609     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. BARDOS, R. P., VIK, E. Towards a framework for selecting remediation technologies for contaminated sites. Land Contamination and Reclamation, 2001, Vol.9, No.1, pp. 119-127. ISSN 0967-0513.
2. BEINAT, E. Value functions for environmental management. Dodrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1997. 241 p. ISBN 0792346629.
3. CZECH INVEST Základnl statisticke výsledky vyhledávacl studie pro lokalizaci brownfieldu. [online]. 2007 [cit. 2008-08-08]. 9 p. Available from: 〈http://www.czechinvest.org/data/files/ stat-vsb-595.pdf〉.
4. CZECH MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT. Environmental Hot Spot Remediation: The Czech Experience. [online] United Nations Development Program. 2004, 24 p. [cit. 2008-01-09]. Available from: 〈http://europeandcis.undp.org/home/show/ 67D7631F-F203-1EE9-BD-C975C04709C847〉.
5. CZECH MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT. Zásady zpracovánl studie proveditelnosti opatře-nl pro nápravu závadného stavu kontaminovaných lokalit. Metodický pokyn. 2007. [online] 2007. 15 p. [cit 2008-04-08). Available from: 〈http://www.env.cz/- C1256D3D006B1934.nsf/$pid/MZPJGFKQF5W8/$FILE/Feas-study.pdf〉.
6. CZECH MINISTRY OF FINANCE. Národnl strategie regenerace brownfieldu. Pracovnl ver-ze. 2004. 90 p.
7. ELIJIDO-TEN, E. Applying Stakeholder Theory to Analyse Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence from Australia's Top 100 Companies. In Proceedings Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand (AFAANZ) Annual Conference, Melbourne, 4-5 June 2005. [online] 2005 [cit 2007-04-20]. Available from: 〈http://www.afaanz.org/web2005/papers/elijidc- teneo-ENV.pdf〉.
8. FREEMAN, R. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Marshfield: Pitman Publishing, 1984, 276 p. ISBN 0273019139.
9. GOSSEN, R., HARDISTY, P., BENOIT, J., DABBS, D., DABROWSKI, T. Site Remediation Technology Advances. In Proc. 15th World Petroleum Congress, Bejing, 1997. Ed. John Wiley & Sons. 1998. ISBN 0471975400.
10. HANSSON S. Decision Theory. A Brief Introduction: Course Material for the subject on risk analysis at Uppsala University, [online] Stockholm: Department of Philosophy and the History of Technology at the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), 1994. [cit. 2008-09-08] 94 p. Available from: 〈http://www.infra. kth.se/~soh/decisio.ntheory.pdf〉.
11. HARDISTY, P., OZDEMIROGLU, E. Costs and Benefits Associated with Remediation of Contaminated Groundwater. A review of the Issues: Technical Report. Bristol: Environment Agency Bristol, 1999. 85 p. ISBN 185705 1319.
12. JACKSON, J., GARB, Y. Hledánl nositele vedoucl úlohy pro řešenl problematiky brownfields ve středoevropských městech. Přehledná studie pro Českou republiku. Překlad vybraných kapitol ze studie. [online]. 2007. [cit. 2008-10-08]. Available from: 〈http://www.uur.cz/images/publikace/uur/2002/ 2002-04/04.pdf〉.
13. KIKER, G., BRIDGES, T., VARGHESE, A., SEAGER, T., LINKOV, I. Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision Making. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2005, 1(2), p. 95-108. ISSN 1551-3793.
14. KIRKWOOD, N. Why Is There So Little Residential Redevelopment of Brownfields? Framing Issues for Discussion. Harvard: Joint Center for Housing Studies, 2001. 23 p.
15. KRAFT, J. Uloha trhu při systematické revitalizaci brownfields. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 2005, Vol.8, No.4, pp. 28-33. ISSN 1212-3609.
16. MINTZBERG, H., RAISINGHANI, D., THEORET, A. The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1976, Vol.21, No.2, pp. 246-275. ISSN 0001-8392.
17. OKX, J. P. Sustainability: Integrated Assessments - Case Study 3. In Sustainable Management of Contaminated Land, CLARINET, Proceedings, Vienna, 21-22 June 2001. [online]. Ed. Federal Environment Agency - Austria, 2001, p. 110 - 115. [ cit. 2008 - 06-09]. Available from: 〈http://www. umweltbundesamt.at/fileadmin/site/umweltthemen/altlasten/clarinet/ proceedings-finalconf.pdf〉. ISBN 3-85457- 594-7.
18. ROUDNÝ, R. Nové metody veřejné správy. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 2007, Vol.10, No.2, pp. 22-28. ISSN 1212-3609.
19. RYDVALOVÁ, P. Možnosti regenerace vy-brané hospodářsky slabé oblasti. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 2006, Vol.9, No.2, pp. 49-57. ISSN 1212-3609.
20. RYDVALOVÁ, P., ŽIŽKA, M. Návrh systému hodnocenl projektu z hlediska dopadu výsledku jejich realizace na hospodářsky slabé oblasti. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 2007, Vol.10, No.1. pp. 33 - 46. ISSN 1212-3609.
21. SCHOLL, H. J. Applying stakeholder theory to e-government: Benefits and limits. In Proceedings of the 1st. IFIP Conference on E-Commerce, E-Business, and E-Government. Zurich, Vol.202, Ed. Schmid et al. Deventer: Kluwer, B.V., 2001, pp. 735-748. ISBN 0-7923-7529-7.
22. VAN ROOYEN, E. Integrated Development and the Brownfields Phenomena. Journal of Public Administration, 2001, Vol.36, No.1, pp. 61-80. ISSN 1053-1858.
23. WILLIAMS, K., DAIR, C. Five Barriers to Sustainable Brownfield Development. Town and Country Planning. 2003, Vol.72, No.11., pp. 344-345. ISSN 0040-9960.