Schematic Structure and Lexico-Grammatical Realization in Corpus-based Genre Analysis: The Case of Research in the PhD Literature Review

Academic Writing: at the Interface of Corpus and Discourse

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 15-36

  Flowerdew, John ^a   Forest, Richard W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901944839     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Ahmad, U.K. (1997). Research article introductions in Malay: Rhetoric in an emerging research community. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp. 273–303). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2. Bhatia, V.K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Harlow: Longman.
3. Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
4. Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T.A. (2007). Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
5. Bunton, D. (2002). Generic moves in Ph.D. thesis introductions. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 57–75). London: Longman.
6. Burgess, S. (2002). Packed houses and intimate gatherings: Audience and rhetorical structure. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 196–215). London: Longman.
7. Connor, U., Precht, K., & Upton, T. (2002). Business English: Learner data from Belgium, Finland and the U.S. In S. Granger, J. Hung, & S. Petch-Tyson (Eds), Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 175–194). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
8. Dunning, T. (1993). Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19, 61–74.
9. Flowerdew, J. (1993a). Concordancing as a tool in course design. System, 21, 231–244.
10. Flowerdew, J. (1993b). A process, or educational, approach to the teaching of professional genres. ELT Journal, 47, 305–316.
11. Flowerdew, J. (2004). Corpus of Applied Linguistics PhD literature reviews. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
12. Flowerdew, L. (1998). Corpus linguistic techniques applied to text linguistics. System, 26, 541–552.
13. Flowerdew, L. (2008). Determining discourse-based moves in professional reports. In A. Ädel & R. Reppen (Eds), Corpora and discourse: The challenges of different settings (pp. 117–131). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
14. Ghadessy, M., Henry, A., & Roseberry, R.L. (Eds). (2001). Small corpus studies and ELT: Theory and practice. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
15. Hasan, R. (1977). Text in the systemic functional model. In W.U. Dressler (Ed.), Current trends in text linguistics (pp. 228–246). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
16. Hasan, R. (1979). On the notion of text. In J.S. Petöfi (Ed.), Text versus sentence: Basic questions in text linguistics (pp. 369–390). Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
17. Hasan, R. (1989). The structure of a text. In M.A.K. Halliday & R. Hasan, Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (pp. 52–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Hoey, M. (1983). On the surface of discourse. London: Allen and Unwin.
19. Johns, T. (1991). Should you be persuaded: Two examples of data-driven learning materials. In T. Johns & P. King (Eds), Classroom concordancing (pp. 1–16). Birmingham: ELR.
20. Johns, T. (1994). From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of data-driven learning. In T. Odlin (Ed.), Perspectives on pedagogical grammar (pp. 27–45). New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Johns, T. (2002). Data-driven learning: The perpetual challenge. In B. Kettermann & G. Marko (Eds), Teaching and learning by doing corpus analysis: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on teaching and language corpora (pp. 107–117). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
22. Kwan, B.S.C. (2006). The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 30–55.
23. Lee, D.Y.W. (2001). Genres, registers, text types, domains, and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning and Technology, 5, 37–72.
24. Lee, D., & Swales, J. (2006). A corpus-based EAP course for NNS doctoral students: Moving from available specialized corpora to self-compiled corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 56–75.
25. Lewin, B.A., Fine, J., & Young, L. (2001). Expository discourse: A genre-based approach to social science research texts. New York: Continuum.
26. Martin, J.R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
27. Melander, B. (1998). Culture or genres? Issues in the interpretation of cross-cultural differences in scientific articles. In I. Fortanet, S. Posteguillo, J.C. Palmer, & J.F. Coll (Eds), Genre studies in English for academic purposes (pp. 211–226). Castello de la Plana: Universitat Jaume I.
28. Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2007). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A handbook for supervisors. London: Routledge.
29. Scott, M. (2004). WordSmith Tools 4.0 [Computer software]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Scott, M. (2007). Oxford WordSmith Tools 4.0 [Computer software]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved 16 July 2008 from www.lexically.net/downloads/version4/WordSmith.pdf.
31. Scott, M., & Tribble, C. (2006). Textual patterns: Key words and corpus analysis in language education. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
32. Sinclair, J. McH. & Coulthard, R.M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Swales, J.M., & Feak, C.B. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students: A course for nonnative speakers of English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
35. Swales, J.M., & Feak, C.B. (2000). English in today’s research world: A writing guide. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
36. Upton, T.A. (2002). Understanding direct mail letters as a genre. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 7, 65–85.
37. Upton, T.A., & Connor, U. (2001). Using computerized corpus analysis to investigate the textlinguistic discourse moves of a genre. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 313–329.
38. Ventola, E. (1987). The structure of social interaction: A systemic approach to the semiotics of service encounters. London: Frances Pinter.