Business English Learner data from Belgium, Finland and the U. S.

Language Learning and Language Teaching

Volumn 6, Issue , 2002, Pages 175-194

  Connor, Ulla ^a   Precht, Kristen ^b   Upton, Thomas ^c  

^a Center for Forensic Science Research and Education   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85127247990     PISSN: 15699471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Atkinson, D. (1999). Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context: The philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Bhatia, V. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. New York: Longman.
3. Bhatia, V. (1995). Applied genre analysis and ESP. The Journal of TESOL-France, 2(2), 161–179.
4. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Connor, U. (1996). Cross-cultural aspects of second-language writing. New-York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Connor, U., Davis, K., & De Rycker, T. (1995). Correctness and clarity in applying for overseas jobs: A cross-cultural analysis of U.S. and Flemish applications. Text, 15(4), 457–476.
7. Connor, U., Davis, K., De Rycker, T., Phillips, E. M., & Verckens, J. P. (1997). An international course in international business writing: Belgium, Finland, the United States. Business Communication Quarterly, 60(4), 63–74.
8. Crystal, D. (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Dudley-Evans, T. (1995). Genre models for the teaching of academic writing to second language speakers: Advantages and disadvantages. The Journal of TESOL-France, 1, 181–192.
10. Flowerdew, L. (1998). Corpus linguistic techniques applied to textlinguistics. System, 26, 541–552.
11. Goby, P. (1999). All business students need to know the same things! The non-culture-specific nature of communication needs. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 13(2), 179–189.
12. Granger, S. (1998). The computer learner corpus: A versatile new source of data for SLA research. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on Computer (pp. 3–18). New York: Longman.
13. Hyland, K., & Milton, J. (1997). Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 183–205.
14. Kinneavy, J. (1971). A theory of discourse. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. Leech, G. (1991). The state of the art in corpus linguistics. In K. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik (pp. 8–29). London: Longman.
16. Martin, J. R. (1993). Genre and literacy-modeling context in educational linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 141–172.
17. Scollon, R. (2000). Genre variablility in news stories in Chinese and English: A contrastive study of five days’ newspapers. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 761–791.
18. Swales, J. (1981). Aspects of article introductions. The University of Aston, Birmingham: Language Studies Unit.
19. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.