Determining discourse-based moves in professional reports

Studies in Corpus Linguistics

Volumn 31, Issue , 2008, Pages 117-133

  Flowerdew, Lynne ^a  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85105785386     PISSN: 13880373     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/scl.31.08flo     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Baker, P. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
2. Bhatia, V. K., Langton,N. & Lung, J. 2004. Legal discourse: Opportunities and threats for corpus linguists. In U. Connor & T. Upton (eds), 203-231.
3. Biber, D., Connor, U. & Upton, T. 2007. Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Connor, U. & Upton, T. (eds). 2004. Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
5. Connor, U., Precht, K. & Upton, T. 2002. Business English: Learner data from Belgium, Finland and the U.S. In Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching, S. Granger, J. Hung & S. Petch-Tyson (eds), 175-194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6. Flowerdew, L. 1998. Corpus linguistic techniques applied to textlinguistics. System 26 (4): 541-552.
7. Flowerdew, L. 2003. A combined corpus and systemic-functional analysis of the Problem-Solution pattern in a student and professional corpus of technical writing. TESOL Quarterly 37(3): 489-511.
8. Flowerdew, L. 2004. The argument for using English specialised corpora to understand academic and professional language. InDiscourse in the Professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics, U. Connor & T. Upton (eds), 11-33 Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
9. Flowerdew, L. 2005. An integration of corpus-based and genre-based approaches to text analysis in EAP/ESP: Countering criticisms against corpus-basedmethodologies. English for Specific Purposes 24: 321-332.
10. Flowerdew, L. 2008. Corpus-based analyses of the problem-solution pattern: A phraseological approach. Amsterdam: JohnBenjamins.
11. Garside, R. 1996. The robust tagging of unrestricted text: The BNC experience. In Using Corpora for Language Research, J. Thomas & M. Short (eds), 167-180. London: Longman.
12. Gledhill, C. 2000. The discourse function of collocation in research article introductions. English for Specific Purposes 19(2): 115-135
13. Henry, A. & Roseberry, R. L. 2001. Using a small corpus to obtain data for teaching a genre. In Small Corpus Studies and ELT, M. Ghadessy, A. Henry & R. L. Roseberry (eds), 93-133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Hoey, M. P. 2001. Textual Interaction. London: Routledge.
15. Paltridge, B. 1994.Genre analysis and the identification of textual boundaries. Applied Linguistics 15(3): 288-299.
16. Scott, M. 1997.WordSmith Tools [Computer software]. Oxford: OUP.
17. Simpson-Vlach, R. & Leicher, S. 2006. The MICASE Handbook: A resource for users of the Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Ann Arbor MI: The University of Michigan Press.
18. Simpson R. C., Briggs, S. L, Ovens, J. & Swales, J. M. 2002. The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Ann Arbor MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan.
19. Swales, J.M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: CUP.
20. Swales, J. M. 2002. Integrated and fragmented worlds: EAP materials and corpus linguistics. In Academic Discourse, J. Flowerdew (ed.), 150-164. London: Longman.
21. Swales, J.M. 2004. Research Genres. Cambridge: CUP.
22. Upton, T. 2002. Understanding direct mail letters as a genre. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7(1): 65-85.
23. Upton, T. & Connor, U. 2001. Using computerized corpus analysis to investigate the textlinguistic discourse moves of a genre. English for Specific Purposes 20(4): 313-329