Influence of feedstock chemical composition on product formation and characteristics derived from the hydrothermal carbonization of mixed feedstocks

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 166, Issue , 2014, Pages 120-131

  Lu, Xiaowei ^a   Berge, Nicole D ^a  

^a University of South Carolina   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon content; Energy; Hydrothermal carbonization; Mixed feedstocks; Prediction

Indexed keywords

CARBON; CARBONIZATION; FORECASTING; FUNCTIONAL GROUPS; THERMOCHEMISTRY;

CARBON CONTENT; CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS; ENERGY; HYDROTHERMAL CARBONIZATION; LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS; PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS; STRUCTURAL COMPLEXITY; SURFACE FUNCTIONAL GROUPS;

FEEDSTOCKS;

CARBON; CELLULOSE; GLUCOSE; LIGNIN; STARCH; XYLOSE; BIOLOGICAL PRODUCT; WATER;

CARBON; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; FUNCTIONAL GROUP; HYDROTHERMAL ACTIVITY; PREDICTION;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS CONVERSION; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; HYDROTHERMAL CARBONIZATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WASTE MANAGEMENT; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMASS; CHEMISTRY; EVALUATION STUDY; HEAT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROCEDURES; WASTE DISPOSAL;

BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND ANALYSIS; BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS; BIOMASS; CARBON; CELLULOSE; HOT TEMPERATURE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REFUSE DISPOSAL; WATER;

EID: 84901940039     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.015     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. 13C NMR investigations. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113:9644-9654.
2. Berge N.D., Ro K.S., Mao J.D., Flora J.R.V., Chappell M.A., Bae S.Y. Hydrothermal carbonization of municipal waste streams. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:5696-5703.
3. Berggren R., Berthold F., Sjoholm E., Lindstrom M. Improved methods for evaluating the molar mass distributions of cellulose in kraft pulp. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 88:1170-1179.
4. Carrier M., Loppinet-Serani A., Absalon C., Aymonier C., Mench M. Degradation pathways of holocellulose, lignin and α-cellulose from Pteris vittata fronds in sub- and super critical conditions. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 43:65-71.
5. Dinjus E., Kruse A., Tröger N. Hydrothermal carbonization - 1. Influence of lignin in lignocelluloses. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2011, 34:2037-2043.
6. 13C NMR spectroscopy of proteins of wet cooked and popped sorghum and maize. J. Cereal Sci. 2001, 33:261-269.
7. Falco C., Baccile N., Titirici M.-M. Morphological and structural differences between glucose, cellulose and lignocellulosic biomass derived hydrothermal carbons. Green Chem. 2011, 13:3273-3281.
8. 13C solid state NMR. Langmuir 2011, 27:14460-14471.
9. Ferguson J.E., Dickinson D.B., Rhodes A.M. Analysis of endosperm sugars in a sweet corn inbred (Illinois 677a) which contains the sugary enhancer (se) gene and comparison of se with other corn genotypes. Plant Physiol. 1979, 63:416-420.
10. Funke A., Ziegler F. Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: a summary and discussion of chemical mechanisms for process engineering. Biofuel Bioprod. Bior. 2010, 4:160-177.
11. Hatfield R., Fukushima R.S. Can lignin be accurately measured?. Crop Sci. 2005, 45:832-839.
12. Hoekman S.K., Broch A., Robbins C. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of lignocellulosic biomass. Energy Fuel 2011, 25:1802-1810.
13. Hoover R. Composition, molecular structure, and physicochemical properties of tuber and root starches: a review. Carbohyd. Polym. 2001, 45:253-267.
14. Hosoya T., Kawamoto H., Saka S. Role of methoxyl group in char formation from lignin-related compounds. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 2009, 84:79-83.
15. Iiyama K., Lam T.B.T., Stone B.A. Covalent cross-links in the cell wall. Plant Physiol. 1994, 104:315-320.
16. Kammann C., Ratering S., Eckhard C., Muller C. Biochar and hydrochar effects on greenhouse gas (carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, and methane) fluxes from soil. J. Environ. Qual. 2012, 41:1052-1066.
17. Kang S., Li X., Fan J., Chang J. Characterization of hydrochars produced by hydrothermal carbonization of lignin, cellulose, d-xylose, and wood meal. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51:9023-9031.
18. Kang S., Li X., Fan J., Chang J. Hydrothermal conversion of lignin: a review. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2013, 27:546-558.
19. Kulkarni N., Shendye A., Rao M. Molecular and biotechnological aspects of xylanases. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 23:411-456.
20. Li L., Diederick R., Flora J.R.V., Berge N.D. Hydrothermal carbonization of food waste and associated packaging materials for energy source generation. Waste Manage. 2013, 33:2478-2492.
21. Libra J.A., Ro K.S., Kammann C., Funke A., Berge N.D., Neubauer Y., Titirici M.M., Fühner C., Bens O., Kern J., Emmerich K.-H. Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels 2011, 2:89-124.
22. Liu Z.G., Zhang F.S., Wu J.Z. Characterization and application of chars produced from pinewood pyrolysis and hydrothermal treatment. Fuel 2010, 89:510-514.
23. Lu X., Pellechia P., Flora J.R.V., Berge N.D. Influence of reaction time and temperature on product formation associated with the hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 138:180-190.
24. Oates C.G. Towards an understanding of starch granule structure and hydrolysis. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1997, 8:375-382.
25. 13CPMAS-NMR spectroscopy and chemical analysis of coarse woody debris in coastal forests of Vancouver Island. Forest Ecol. Manage. 1998, 111:51-68.
26. Saulnier L., Marot C., Chanliaud E., Thibault J.F. Cell wall polysaccharide interactions in maize bran. Carbohyd. Polym. 1995, 26:279-287.
27. Sevilla M., Fuertes A.B. The production of carbon materials by hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose. Carbon 2009, 47:2281-2289.
28. Sevilla M., Fuertes A.B. Sustainable porous carbons with a superior performance for CO2 capture. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4:1765-1771.
29. Stemann J., Putschew A., Ziegler F. Hydrothermal carbonization: process water characterization and effects of water recirculation. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 143:139-146.
30. Sweet M.S., Winandy J.E. Influence of degree of polymerization of cellulose and hemicellulose on strength loss in fire-retardant-treated southern pine. Holzforschung 1999, 53:311-317.
31. Waigh T.A., Donald A.M., Heidelbach F., Riekel C., Gidley M.J. Analysis of the native structure of starch granules with small angle X-ray microfocus scattering. Biopolymers 1999, 49:91-105.
32. Wang Z., McDonald A.G., Westerhof R.J.M., Kersten S.R.A., Cuba-Torres C.M., Ha S., Pecha B., Garcia-Perez M. Effect of cellulose crystallinity on the formation of a liquid intermediate and on product distribution during pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 2013, 100:56-66.
33. Williams P.T., Onwudili J. Subcritical and supercritical water gasification of cellulose, starch, glucose, and biomass waste. Energy Fuel 2006, 20:1259-1265.
34. Xie F., Yu L., Chen L., Li L. A new study of starch gelatinization under shear stress using dynamic mechanical analysis. Carbohyd. Polym. 2008, 72:229-234.
35. Yasuda S., Fukushima K., Kakehi A. Formation and chemical structures of acid-soluble lignin I: sulfuric acid treatment time and acid-soluble lignin content of hardwood. J. Wood Sci. 2001, 47:69-72.
36. Yu S.H., Cui X.J., Li L.L., Li K., Yu B., Antonietti M., Cölfen H. From starch to metal/carbon hybrid nanostructures: hydrothermal metal-catalyzed carbonization. Adv. Mater. 2004, 16:1636-1640.
37. Zobel H.F., Young S.N., Rocca L.A. Starch gelatinization: an X-ray diffraction study. Cereal Chem. 1988, 65:443-446.