Toward more robust projections of forest landscape dynamics under novel environmental conditions: Embedding PnET within LANDIS-II

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 287, Issue , 2014, Pages 44-57

  De Bruijn, Arjan ^a,b   Gustafson, Eric J ^b   Sturtevant, Brian R ^b   Foster, Jane R ^c   Miranda, Brian R ^b   Lichti, Nathanael I ^a   Jacobs, Douglass F ^a  

^a Department of Forestry and Natural Resources Purdue University ^*  (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon sequestration; Climate change; Forest landscape model; LANDIS II; PnET II; Tree competition model

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; PHYSIOLOGY; SUN;

CARBON SEQUESTRATION; FOREST LANDSCAPE MODELING; LANDIS-II; PNET-II; TREE COMPETITION;

FORESTRY;

BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; GLOBAL CHANGE; GROWTH RATE; LANDSCAPE; SUCCESSION;

CARBON; CHELATION; CLIMATES; ECOLOGY; FORESTRY; MODELS; PHYSIOLOGY;

MARYLAND; NORTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84901787499     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Aber J.D., Federer A.C. A generalized, lumped-parameter model of photosynthesis, evapotranspiration and net primary production in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems. Oecologia 1992, 92:463-474.
2. Aber J.D., Ollinger S.V., Federer A., Reich P.B., Goulden M.L., Kicklighter D.W., Melillo J.M., Lathrop R.G. Predicting the effects of climate change on water yield and forest production in the northeastern United States. Clim. Res. 1995, 5:207-222.
3. 2 exchange to the canopy: a generalized model of forest photosynthesis validated by eddy correlation. Oecologia 1996, 106:257-265.
4. Abrams M.D. The red maple paradox. Bioscience 1998, 48:355-364.
5. Allen M.F. The Ecology of Mycorrhizae (Cambridge Studies in Ecology) 1991, Cambridge University Press.
6. Asner G.P., Scurlock J.M.O., Hicke J.A. Global synthesis of leaf area index observations: implications for ecological and remote sensing studies. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2003, 12:191-205.
7. Aukema J.E., McCullough D.G., Von Holle B., Liebhold A.M., Britton K., Frankel S. Historical accumulation of nonindigenous forest pests in the continental United States. Bioscience 2010, 60:886-897.
8. Benzarti J. Temperature and water-use efficiency by lucerne (Medicago sativa) sheltered by a tree windbreak in Tunisia. Agrofor. Syst. 1999, 43:95-108.
9. Botkin D.B., Janak J.F., Wallis J.R. Rationale, limitations, and assumptions of a northeastern forest growth simulator. IBM J. Res. Dev. 1972, 16:101-116.
10. Brown M.L., Brown R.G. Herbaceous Plants of Maryland 1984, Port City Press, Baltimore, MD.
11. Cuddington K., Fortin M.-J., Gerber L.R., Hastings A., Liebhold A., O'Connor M., Ray C. Process based models are required to manage ecological systems in a changing world. Ecosphere 2013, 4:20.
12. Drake J.E., Davis S.C., Raetz L.M., DeLucia E.H. Mechanisms of age-related changes in forest production: the influence of physiological and successional changes. Glob. Change Biol. 2011, 17:1522-1535.
13. Driscoll C.T., Lawrence G.B., Bulger A.J., Butler T.J., Cronan C.S., Eagar C., Lambert K.F., Likens G.E., Stoddard J.L., Weathers K.C. Acidic deposition in the northeastern United States: sources and inputs, ecosystem effects, and management strategies. Bioscience 2001, 51:180-198.
14. Dybzinski R., Farrior C., Wolf A., Reich P.B., Pacala S.W. Evolutionarily stable strategy carbon allocation to foliage, wood, and fine roots in trees competing for light and nitrogen: an analytically tractable, individual-based model and quantitative comparisons to data. Am. Nat. 2011, 177:153-166.
15. Fei S., Kong N., Steiner K.C., Moser W.K., Steiner E.B. Change in oak abundance in the eastern United States from 1980 to 2008. For. Ecol. Manag. 2011, 262:1370-1377.
16. Foster J.R. Forest insect defoliation patterns and carbon dynamics: linking remote sensing with simulation models 2011, (PhD Dissertation), University of Wisconsin.
17. Foster J.R., Scheller R.M., Sturtevant B.R., Townsend P.A., Mladenoff D.J. Forest insect defoliation and carbon dynamics: simulating multiple defoliators in temperate landscapes with LANDIS-II. Ecol. Appl. 2014, (submitted for publication).
18. Gower S.T., McMurtrieb R.E., Murty D. Aboveground net primary production decline with stand age: potential causes. Trees 1996, 11:378-382.
19. Gray A.N., Spies T.A., Easter M.J. Microclimatic and soil moisture responses to gap formation in coastal Douglas-fir forests. Can. J. For. Res. 2002, 32:332-343.
20. Greene D.F., Zasada John C., Sirois L., Kneeshaw D., Morin H., Charron I., Simard M.J. A review of the regeneration dynamics of North American boreal forest tree species. Can. J. For. Res. 1999, 29(6):824-839.
21. Gustafson E.J. When the past can't be used to predict the future: using mechanistic models to predict landscape ecological dynamics in a changing world. Landsc. Ecol. 2013, 28:1429-1437.
22. Gustafson E.J., Shifley S.R., Mladenoff D.J., Nimerfro K.K., He H.S. Spatial simulation of forest succession and timber harvesting using LANDIS. Can. J. For. Res. 2000, 30:32-43.
23. Gustafson E.J., Shvidenko A.Z., Sturtevant B.R., Scheller R.M. Predicting global change effects on forest biomass and composition in south-central Siberia. Ecol. Appl. 2010, 20:700-715.
24. Gustafson E.J., Kubiske M.E., Sturtevant B.R., Miranda B.R. Scaling Aspen-FACE experimental results to century and landscape scales. Landsc. Ecol. 2013, 28:1785-1800.
25. He H.S. Forest landscape models: definitions, characterization, and classification. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 254:484-498.
26. He H.S., Mladenoff D.J. Spatially explicit and stochastic simulation of forest landscape fire disturbance and succession. Ecology 1999, 80:81-99.
27. Hoch G., Richter A., Körner C. Non-structural carbon compounds in temperate forest trees. Plant Cell Environ. 2003, 26:1067-1081.
28. 2 production and transport in Duke Forest using a process-based modeling approach. Glob. Biochem. Cycles 2004, 18:GB4029. 10.1029/2004GB002297.
29. IPCC Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 976 pp. M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden, C.E. Hanson (Eds.).
30. CERES-Maize: A Simulation Model of Maize Growth and Development 1986, Texas A&M University Press, College Station, 194 pp. C.A. Jones, J.R. Kiniry (Eds.).
31. Keane R.E., Loehman R.A., Holsinger L.M. The FireBGCv2 landscape fire and succession model: a research simulation platform for exploring fire and vegetation dynamics. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-255 2011, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO, 137 pp.
32. Keane R.E., Miller C., Smithwick E., McKenzie D., Falk D., Kellogg L. Representing climate, disturbance, and vegetation interactions in landscape simulation models. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, (submitted for publication).
33. Keeling H.C., Phillips O.L. The global relationship between forest productivity and biomass. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2007, 16:618-631.
34. Latif A., Blackburn G.A. Forest microclimate modelling using gap and canopy properties. SilviLaser 2008, 151-158.
35. Laughlin D.C., Bakker J.D., Stoddard M.T., Daniels M.L., Springer J.D., Gildar C.N., Greena A.M., Covington W. Toward reference conditions: wildfire effects on flora in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 2004, 199:137-152.
36. Lindroth A., Ciencials E. Water use efficiency of short-rotation Salix viminalis at leaf, tree and stand scales. Tree Physiol. 1996, 16:257-262.
37. Lischke H., Zimmermann N.E., Bolliger J., Rickebusch S., Loffler T.J. TreeMig: a forest-landscape model for simulating spatio-temporal patterns from stand to landscape scale. Ecol. Model. 2006, 199:409-420.
38. Messier C., Doucet R., Ruel J.C., Claveau Y., Kelly C., Lechowicz M.J. Functional ecology of advance regeneration in relation to light in boreal forests. Can. J. For. Res. 1999, 29:812-823.
39. Morrissey R.C., Jacobs D.F., Seifert J.R., Fischer B.C., Kershaw J.A. Competitive success of natural oak regeneration in clearcuts during the stem exclusion stage. Can. J. For. Res. 2008, 38:1419-1430.
40. Moser W.K., Barnard E.L., Billings R.F., Crocker S.J., Dix M.E., Gray A.N., Ice G.G., Kim M.S., Reid R., Rodman S.U., McWilliams W.H. Impacts of nonnative invasive species on US forests and recommendations for policy and management. J. For. 2009, 107:320-327.
41. Norby R.J., Jackson R.B. Root dynamics and global change: seeking an ecosystem perspective. New Phytol. 2000, 147:3-12.
42. Oliver C.D. Forest development in North America following major disturbances. For. Ecol. Manag. 1981, 3:153-168.
43. Oliver C.D., Larson B.C. Forest Stand Dynamics 1996, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 521 pp. Update edition.
44. Ollinger S.V., Aber J.D., Federer C.A., Lovett G.M., Ellis J.M. Modelling physical and chemical climate of the northeastern U.S. for geographic information system. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-191.l 1995.
45. Parton W.J., Ojima D.S., Cole C.V., Schimel D.S. A general model for soil organic matter dynamics: sensitivity to litter chemistry, texture and management. Quantitative Modeling of Soil Forming Processes 1994, 147-167. Soil Sci. Soc. Am, Madison, WI. R.B. Bryant, R.W. Arnoldm (Eds.).
46. Pastor J., Post W.M. Development of a linked forest productivity-soil process model 1985, ORNL/TM-9519, Oak Ridge, TN.
47. Pitelka L.F., Gardner R.H., Ash J., Berry S., Gitay H., Noble I.R., Saunders A., Bradshaw R.H.W., Brubaker L., Clark J.S., Davis M.B., Sugita S., Dyer J.S., Hengeveld R., Hope G., Huntley B., King G.A., Lavorel S., Mack R.N., Malanson G.P., McGlone M., Prentice I.C., Rejmanek M. Plant migration and climate change. Am. Scientist 1997, 85:464-473.
48. Reich P.B., Abrams M.D., Ellsworth D.S., Kruger E.L., Tabone T.J. Fire affects ecophysiology and community dynamics of central Wisconsin oak forest regeneration. Ecology 1990, 71:2179-2190.
49. Scheller R.M. LANDIS-II Biomass Succession v.3.1: Extension user's guide. Published online by Portland State University 2012, http://www.landis-ii.org/exts/biomass-succession.
50. Scheller R.M., Domingo J.B. LANDIS-II core model description. Published online by the University of Wisconsin 2006, http://www.landis-ii.org/documentation/ModelDescription5.1.pdf.
51. Scheller R.M., Mladenoff D.J. A forest growth and biomass module for a landscape simulation model, LANDIS: design, validation, and application. Ecol. Model. 2004, 180:211-229.
52. Scheller R.M., Mladenoff D.J. An ecological classification of forest landscape simulation models: tools and strategies for understanding broad-scale forested ecosystems. Landsc. Ecol. 2007, 22:491-505.
53. Scheller R.M., Domingo J.B., Miranda B.R. LANDIS-II Base Wind v.1.3: Extension user's guide. Published online by the University of Wisconsin 2007, http://www.landis-ii.org/exts/wind.
54. Scheller R.M., Domingo J.B., Sturtevant B.R., Williams J.S., Rudy A., Gustafson E.J., Mladenoff D.J. Design, development, and application of LANDIS-II, a spatial landscape simulation model with flexible temporal and spatial resolution. Ecol. Model. 2007, 201:409-419.
55. Scheller R.M., Hua D., Bolstad P.V., Birdsey R., Mladenoff D.J. The effects of forest harvest intensity in combination with wind disturbance on carbon dynamics in a Lake States mesic landscape. Ecol. Model. 2011, 222:144-153.
56. Smith J.E., Heath L.S., Skog K.E., Birdsey R.A. Methods for calculating forest ecosystem and harvested carbon with standard estimates for forest types of the United States. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-343 2006, Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, USA, 216 pp.
57. Springer C.J., DeLucia E.H., Thomas R.B. Relationships between net photosynthesis and foliar nitrogen concentrations in a loblolly pine forest ecosystem grown in elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Tree Physiol. 2005, 25:385-394.
58. Sturtevant B.R., Seagle S.W. Comparing estimates of forest site quality in old second-growth oak forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2004, 191:311-328.
59. Sturtevant B.R., Gustafson E.J., Li W., He H.S. Modeling biological disturbances in LANDIS: a module description and demonstration using spruce budworm. Ecol. Model. 2004, 180:153-174.
60. Sturtevant B.R., Scheller R.M., Miranda B.R., Shinneman D., Syphard A. Simulating dynamic and mixed-severity fire regimes: a process-based fire extension for LANDIS-II. Ecol. Model. 2009, 220:3380-3393.
61. Thuiller W., et al. Predicting global change impacts on plant species' distributions: future challenges. Persp. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2008, 9:137-152.
62. Townsend P.A., Foster J.R., Chastain R.A., Currie W.S. Application of imaging spectroscopy to mapping canopy nitrogen in the forests of the central Appalachian Mountains using Hyperion and AVIRIS. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2003, 41:1347-1354.
63. Townsend P.A., Eshleman K.N., Welcker C. Remote sensing of Gypsy moth defoliation to assess variations in stream nitrogen concentrations. Ecol. Appl. 2004, 14:504-516.
64. Valladares F., Niinemets U. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2008, 39:237-257.
65. Vose J.M., Dougherty P.M., Long J.N., Smith F.W., Gholz H.L., Curran P.J. Factors influencing the amount and distribution of leaf area of pine stands. Ecol. Bull. 1994, 43:102-114.
66. Wang W.J., He H.S., Spetich M.A., Shifley S.R., Thompson F.R., Larsen D.R., Fraser J.S., Yang J. A large-scale forest landscape model incorporating multi-scale processes and utilizing forest inventory data. Ecosphere 2013, 4:106.
67. Wang W.J., He H.S., Fraser J.S., Thompson F.R., Shifley S.R., Spetich M.A. LANDIS PRO: a landscape model that predicts forest composition and structure changes at regional scales. Ecography 2014, 37:1-5.
68. Webb W., Szarek S., Lauenroth W., Kinerson R., Smith M. Primary productivity and water use in native forest, grassland and desert ecosystems. Ecology 1978, 6:1239-1247.
69. Whittaker R.H., Marks P.L. Methods of assessing terrestrial productivity. Primary Productivity of the Biosphere 1975, 55-117. Springer-Verlag, New York. H. Lieth, R.H. Whittaker (Eds.).
70. Williams J.W., Jackson S.T. Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2007, 5:475-482.
71. Xu C., Gertner G.Z., Scheller R.M. Uncertainty in the response of a forest landscape to global climatic change. Glob. Change Biol. 2009, 15:116-213.