Scaling Aspen-FACE experimental results to century and landscape scales

Landscape Ecology

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1785-1800

  Gustafson, Eric J ^a   Kubiske, Mark E ^a   Sturtevant, Brian R ^a   Miranda, Brian R ^a  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Aspen FACE; Carbon dynamics; Forest composition; Forest landscape modeling; Global change; LANDIS II; Ozone pollution; Scaling

Indexed keywords

CARBON SEQUESTRATION; DATA ASSIMILATION; DISTURBANCE; DOMINANCE; GLOBAL CHANGE; LANDSCAPE; LONGEVITY; NUTRIENT ENRICHMENT; OZONE; SEED DISPERSAL; SHADE TOLERANCE; SUCCESSION;

UNITED STATES; WISCONSIN;

ACER; POPULUS;

EID: 84888004955     PISSN: 09212973     EISSN: 15729761     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-013-9921-x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. 3 modify understory biomass production and nitrogen acquisition. Plant Soil 282: 251-259.
2. 2-controlled mechanism of woody plant invasion in grasslands and savannas. Glob Chang Biol 6: 865-870.
3. Burns RM, Honkala BH (1990) Silvics of North America, vol. 2, Hardwoods. USDA Forest Service Agriculture Handbook 654. Washington.
4. 2 have increased growth of natural stands of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides). Global Change Biol 16: 2186-2197.
5. Darbah JNT, Kubiske ME, Nelson ND, Oksanen E, Väpäävuori E, Karnosky DF (2008) Effects of decadal exposure to interacting elevated CO2 and/or O3 on paper birch (Betula papyrifera) reproduction. Environ Pollut 155: 446-452.
6. 3 enrichment (FACE) project: an overview. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-214. North Central Research Station, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
7. Dragoni D, Schmid HP, Wayson CA, Potter H, Grimmond SCB, Randolph JC (2011) Evidence of increased net ecosystem productivity associated with a longer vegetated season in a deciduous forest in south-central Indiana, USA. Glob Chang Biol 17: 886-897.
8. 2. Ecol Lett 14: 349-357.
9. Felzer B, Kicklighter D, Melillo J, Wang C, Zhuang Q (2004) Effects of ozone on net primary production and carbon sequestration in the conterminous United States using a biogeochemistry model. Tellus 56B: 230-248.
10. 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 14014-14019.
11. Frelich LE, Reich PB (2010) Will environmental changes reinforce the impact of global warming on the prairie-forest border of central North America? Front Ecol Environ 8: 371-378.
12. Gardner RH (2011) Neutral models and the analysis of landscape structure. In: Jopp F, Reuter H, Breckling B (eds) Modelling complex ecological dynamics. Springer, New York, pp 215-229.
13. Gardner RH, Milne BT, Turner MG, O'Neill RV (1987) Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol 1: 19-28.
14. Gustafson EJ, Shifley SR, Mladenoff DJ, He HS, Nimerfro KK (2000) Spatial simulation of forest succession and timber harvesting using LANDIS. Can J For Res 30: 32-43.
15. He HS, DeZonia BE, Mladenoff DJ (2000) An aggregation index (AI) to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes. Landscape Ecol 15: 591-601.
16. 2 enrichment on the photosynthetic light response of sun and shade leaves of canopy sweetgum trees (Liquidambar styraciflua) in a forest ecosystem. Tree Physiol 19: 779-786.
17. Hogg EH, Brandt JP, Michaelian M (2008) Impacts of a regional drought on the productivity, dieback, and biomass of western Canadian aspen forests. Can J For Res 38: 1373-1384.
18. 2 enrichment. Funct Ecol 15: 344-350.
19. Karnosky DF, Pregitzer KS, Zak DR, Kubiske ME, Hendrey GR, Weinstein D, Nosal M, Percy KE (2005) Scaling ozone responses of forest trees to the ecosystem level in a changing climate. Plant Cell Environ 28: 965-981.
20. 2] as a driver of past and current changes in savanna tree cover. Austr Ecol 35: 451-463.
21. 2 and light availability on the photosynthetic light response of trees of contrasting shade tolerance. Tree Physiol 16: 351-358.
22. Kubiske ME, Zak DR, Pregitzer KS, Takeuchi Y (2002) Photosynthetic acclimation of overstory Populus tremuloides and understory Acer saccharum to elevated atmospheric CO2: interactions with shade and soil N. Tree Physiol 22: 321-329.
23. 3 on intra- and interspecific competitive ability of aspen. Plant Biol 9: 342-355.
24. Luo Y, Su B, Currie WS, Dukes JS, Finzi A, Hartwig U, Hungate B, McMurtrie RE, Oren R, Parton WJ, Pataki DE, Shaw MR, Zak DR, Field CB (2004) Progressive nitrogen limitation of ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. Biosci 54: 731-739.
25. Miranda, B. R (2012) LANDIS-II-Site v2. 3 User guide. http://www. landis-ii. org/users. Accessed 5 June 2013.
26. 2 and ozone shift the genetic composition of aspen (Populus tremuloides) stands? New Phytol 198(2): 466-475.
27. 2 enhancement of forest productivity constrained by limited nitrogen availability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 19368-19373.
28. Ollinger SV, Aber JD, Peich PB (1997) Simulating ozone effects on forest productivity: interactions among leaf, canopy and stand-level processes. Ecol Appl 7: 1237-1251.
29. 3 plants. Plant Physiol 94: 1728-1734.
30. SAS Institute Inc. (2011) SAS/STAT® 9. 3 User's Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
31. Scheller RM (2012) LANDIS-II Biomass Succession v3. 1 Extension User Guide. http://www. landis-ii. org/exts/biomass-succession/LANDIS-II%20Biomass%20Succession%20v3. 1%20User%20Guide. pdf. Accessed 5 June 2013.
32. Scheller RM, Mladenoff DJ (2004) A forest growth and biomass module for a landscape simulation model, LANDIS: design, validation, and application. Ecol Modelling 180: 211-229.
33. Scheller RM, Mladenoff DJ (2005) A spatially interactive simulation of climate change, harvesting, wind, and tree species migration and projected changes to forest composition and biomass in northern Wisconsin, USA. Glob Chang 11: 307-321.
34. Scheller RM, Domingo JB, Sturtevant BR, Williams JS, Rudy A, Gustafson EJ, Mladenoff DJ (2007) Design, development, and application of LANDIS-II, a spatial landscape simulation model with flexible temporal and spatial resolution. Ecol Model 201: 409-419.
35. Siegenthaler U, Stocker TF, Monnin E, Lüthi D, Schwander J, Stauffer B, Raynaud D, Barnola JM, Fischer H, Masson-Delmotte V, Jouzel J (2005) Stable carbon cycle-climate relationship during the late Pleistocene. Science 310: 1313-1317.
36. Smith JE, Heath LS, Skog KE, Birdsey RA (2006) Methods for calculating forest ecosystem and harvested carbon with standard estimates for forest types of the United States. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-343. Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, USA.
37. Wu Z, Dijstra P, Koch GW, Peñuelas J, Hungate BA (2011) Responses of terrestrial ecosystems to temperature and precipitation change: a meta-analysis of experimental manipulation. Glob Chang Biol 17: 927-942.
38. 2. J Ecol 98: 197-208.
39. Xu C, Gertner GZ, Scheller RM (2012) Importance of colonization and competition in forest landscape response to global climatic change. Clim Change 110: 53-83.
40. 2. Ecol Lett 14: 1220-1226.