On the Emancipation of PLS-SEM: A Commentary on Rigdon (2012)

Long Range Planning

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 154-160

  Sarstedt, Marko ^a   Ringle, Christian M ^b   Henseler, Jörg ^c   Hair, Joseph F ^d  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b HAMBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^d KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING; FINANCE;

CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENTS; FACTOR MODEL; PREDICTIVE CAPABILITIES; SET CORRELATION; TESTING THEORIES; THEORY TESTING;

SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

CORRELATION; LEAST SQUARES METHOD; MODEL TEST; MODELING; PREDICTION; TESTING METHOD; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 84901686691     PISSN: 00246301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2014.02.007     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Anderson James C., Gerbing David W. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 1988, 103(3):411-423.
2. Apel Heino, Wold Herman Soft modeling with latent variables in two or more dimensions: PLS estimation and testing for predictive relevance. Systems Under Indirect Observations: Part II 1982, 209-247. Amsterdam: North-Holland. K.G. Jöreskog, H. Wold (Eds.).
3. Bacharach Samuel B. Organizational theories: some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review 1989, 14(4):496-515.
4. Bagozzi R.P., Richard P., Yi Youjae Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2012, 40(1):8-34.
5. Becker Jan-Michael, Rai Arun, Ringle Christian M., Völckner Franziska Discovering unobserved heterogeneity in structural equation models to avert validity threats. MIS Quarterly 2013, 37(3):665-694.
6. Bentler Peter M., Huang Wenjing On components, latent variables, PLS and simple methods: reactions to Ridgon's rethinking of PLS. Long Range Planning 2014, 47(3):138-145.
7. Chin Wynne W. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research 1998, 295-358. Erlbaum, Mahwah. G.A. Marcoulides (Ed.).
8. Chin Wynne W. How to write up and report PLS analyses. Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications (Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics Series, vol. II) 2010, 655-690. Springer, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York. V. Esposito Vinzi, W.W. Chin, J. Henseler, H. Wang (Eds.).
9. Chou Chih-Ping, Bentler Peter M. Model modification in covariance structure modeling: a comparison among likelihood ratio, Lagrange multiplier, and Wald tests. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1990, 25(1):115-136.
10. Cliff Norman Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1983, 18(1):115-126.
11. Cohen Jacob Set correlation as a general multivariate data-analytic method. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1982, 17(3):301-341.
12. Colquitt Jason A., Zapata-Phelan Cindy P. Trends in theory building and theory testing: a five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal 2007, 50(6):1281-1303.
13. Diamantopoulos Adamantios Modelling with LISREL: a guide for the uninitiated. Journal of Marketing Management 1994, 10(1-3):105-136.
14. Diamantopoulos Adamantios, Sarstedt Marko, Fuchs Christoph, Kaiser Sebastian, Wilczynski Petra Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2012, 40(3):434-449.
15. Dijkstra Theo K. Latent variables and indices: Herman Wold's basic design and partial least squares. Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications (Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics Series, vol. II) 2010, 23-46. Springer, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York. V. Esposito Vinzi, W.W. Chin, J. Henseler, H. Wang (Eds.).
16. Dijkstra Theo K. PLS' Janus Face. Long Range Planning 2014, 47(3):146-153.
17. Fornell Claes G. A second generation of multivariate analysis: an overview. A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis 1982, 1-21. Praeger, New York. C. Fornell (Ed.).
18. Geisser Seymour A predictive approach to the random effects model. Biometrika 1974, 61(1):101-107.
19. Goodhue Dale L., Lewis William, Thompson Ron Comparing PLS to regression and LISREL: a response to Marcolides, Chin, and Saunders. MIS Quarterly 2012, 36(3):703-716.
20. Green Samuel B., Thompson Marilyn S., Babyak Michael A. A Monte Carlo investigation of methods for controlling type I errors with specification searches in structural equation modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1998, 33(3):365-383.
21. Greenwald Anthony G., Pratkanis Anthony R., Leippe Michael R., Baumgardner Michael H. Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress?. Psychological Review 1986, 93(2):216-229.
22. Hahn Carsten, Johnson Michael D., Herrmann Andreas, Huber Frank Capturing customer heterogeneity using a finite mixture PLS approach. Schmalenbach Business Review 2002, 54(3):243-269.
23. Hair Joseph F., Sarstedt Marko, Ringle Christian M., Mena Jeannette A. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2012, 40(3):414-433.
24. Hair Joseph F., Hult G., Tomas M., Ringle Christian M., Sarstedt Marko A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) 2014, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
25. Hair Joseph F., Ringle Christian M., Sarstedt Marko PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 2011, 19(2):139-151.
26. Hair Joseph F., Ringle Christian M., Sarstedt Marko Partial least squares: the better approach to structural equation modeling?. Long Range Planning 2012, 45(5-6):312-319.
27. Hair Joseph F., Ringle Christian M., Sarstedt Marko Partial least squares structural equation modeling: rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning 2013, 46(1-2):1-12.
28. Hair Joseph F., Sarstedt Marko, Pieper Torsten M., Ringle Christian M. The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: a review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning 2012, 45(5-6):320-340.
29. Hanafi Mohamed PLS path modelling: computation of latent variables with the estimation mode B. Computational Statistics 2007, 22(2):275-292.
30. Henseler Jörg, Fassott Georg, Dijkstra Theo K., Wilson Bradley Analysing quadratic effects of formative constructs by means of variance-based structural equation modelling. European Journal of Information Systems 2011, 21(1):99-112.
31. Henseler Jörg Why generalized structured component analysis is not universally preferable to structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2012, 40(3):402-413.
32. Henseler J., Dijkstra T.K., Sarstedt M., Ringle C.M., Diamantopoulos A., Straub D.W., Ketchen D.J., Hair J.F., Hult G.T.M., Calantone R.J. Common beliefs and reality about partial least squares: Comments on Rönkkö & Evermann (2014). Organizational Research Methods 2014, (in press).
33. Henseler Jörg, Ringle Christian M., Sarstedt Marko Using partial least squares path modeling in international advertising research: basic concepts and recent issues. Handbook of Research in International Advertising 2012, 252-276. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham. S. Okazaki (Ed.).
34. Henseler Jörg, Ringle Christian M., Sinkovics Rudolf R. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing 2009, 277-320. Emerald, Bingley. R.R. Sinkovics, P.N. Ghauri (Eds.).
35. Henseler Jörg, Sarstedt Marko Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics 2013, 28(2):565-580.
36. Homburg Christian, Dobratz Andreas Covariance structure analysis via specification searches. Statistical Papers 1992, 33(1):119-142.
37. Hu Li-tze, Bentler Peter M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods 1998, 3(4):424-453.
38. Hwang Heungsun, Malhotra Naresh K., Kim Youngchan, Tomiuk Marc A., Hong Sungjin A comparative study on parameter recovery of three approaches to structural equation modeling. Journal of Marketing Research 2010, 47(4):699-712.
39. Jöreskog Karl G. Testing structural equation models. Testing Structural Equation Models 1993, 294-316. Sage, Newbury Park. K.A. Bollen, J.S. Long (Eds.).
40. Jöreskog Karl G., Sörbom Dag LISREL V: Analyses of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood 1981, National Educational Resources, Chicago.
41. Jöreskog Karl G., Wold Herman The ML and PLS techniques for modeling with latent variables: historical and comparative aspects. Systems Under Indirect Observation, Part I 1982, 263-270. North-Holland, Amsterdam. H. Wold, K.G. Jöreskog (Eds.).
42. Kuppelwieser Volker, Sarstedt Marko Applying the future time perspective scale to advertising research. International Journal of Advertising 2014, 33(1):113-136.
43. Lohmöller Jan-Bernd Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares 1989, Physica, Heidelberg.
44. MacCallum Robert C., Browne Michael W. The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: some practical issues. Psychological Bulletin 1993, 114(3):533-541.
45. Marcoulides George A., Chin Wynne W., Saunders Carol When imprecise statistical statements become problematic: a response to Goodhue, Lewis, and Thompson. MIS Quarterly 2012, 36(3):717-728.
46. McDonald Roderick P. Path analysis with composite variables. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1996, 31(2):239-270.
47. Reinartz Werner J., Haenlein Michael, Henseler Jörg An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2009, 26(4):332-344.
48. Rigdon Edward E. Rethinking partial least squares path modeling: in praise of simple methods. Long Range Planning 2012, 45(5-6):341-358.
49. Ringle Christian M., Sarstedt Marko, Schlittgen Rainer Genetic algorithm segmentation in partial least squares structural equation modeling. OR Spectrum 2014, 36(1):251-276.
50. Ringle Christian M., Sarstedt Marko, Schlittgen Rainer, Taylor Charles R. PLS path modeling and evolutionary segmentation. Journal of Business Research 2013, 66(9):1318-1324.
51. Ringle Christian M., Sarstedt Marko, Straub Detmar W. A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS Quarterly. MIS Quarterly 2012, 36(1):iii-xiv.
52. Roberts Seth, Pashler Harold How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychological Review 2000, 107(2):358-367.
53. Robins James A. Partial-least squares. Long Range Planning 2012, 45(5-6):309-311.
54. Robins James A. Partial least squares revisited. Long Range Planning 2014, 47(3):131.
55. Sarstedt Marko Market segmentation with mixture regression models. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing 2008, 16(3):228-246.
56. Sarstedt Marko A review of recent approaches for capturing heterogeneity in partial least squares path modelling. Journal of Modelling in Management 2008, 3(2):140-161.
57. Sarstedt Marko, Becker Jan-Michael, Ringle Christian M., Schwaiger Manfred Uncovering and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: which model selection criterion provides an appropriate number of segments?. Schmalenbach Business Review 2011, 63(1):34-62.
58. Sarstedt Marko, Ringle Christian M. Treating unobserved heterogeneity in PLS path modelling: a comparison of FIMIX-PLS with different data analysis strategies. Journal of Applied Statistics 2010, 37(8):1299-1318.
59. Sarstedt Marko, Ringle Christian M., Hair Joseph F. PLS-SEM: Looking back and moving forward. Long Range Planning 2014, 47(3):132-137.
60. Sarstedt Marko, Wilczynski Petra, Melewar T.C. Measuring reputation in global markets - a comparison of reputation measures' convergent and criterion validities. Journal of World Business 2013, 48(3):329-339.
61. Shmueli Galit To explain or to predict?. Statistical Science 2010, 25(3):289-310.
62. Shmueli Galit, Koppius Otto R. Predictive analytics in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 2010, 35(3):553-572.
63. Stone Mervyn Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1974, 36(2):111-147.
64. Tenenhaus Arthur, Tenenhaus Michel Regularized generalized canonical correlation analysis. Psychometrika 2011, 76(2):257-284.
65. Tenenhaus Michel, Esposito Vinzi Vincenzo, Chatelin Yves-Marie, Lauro Carlo PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2005, 48(1):159-205.
66. Tomarken Andrew J., Waller Niels G. Potential problems with "well fitting" models. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2003, 112(4):578-598.
67. Vilares Manuel J., Coelho Pedro S. Likelihood and PLS estimators for structural equation modeling: an assessment of sample size, Skewness and model misspecification effects. Advances in Regression, Survival Analysis, Extreme Values, Markov Processes and Other Statistical Applications 2013, 11-33. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. J. Lita da Silva, F. Caeiro, I. Natário, C.A. Braumann (Eds.).
68. Wold Herman Soft modeling: the basic design and some extensions. Systems Under Indirect Observations: Part II 1982, 1-54. North-Holland, Amsterdam. K.G. Jöreskog, H. Wold (Eds.).
69. Wold Herman Partial least squares. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences 1985, 581-591. Wiley, New York. S. Kotz, N.L. Johnson (Eds.).
70. Wooldridge Jeffrey M. Introductory Econometrics. A Modern Approach 2003, Thomson South-Western, Mason, OH.